Bikini Armor Battle Damage - Hypocrites and Sexy Art

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Shaka Brah said:
They might think they're appropriation or something. Though it's funny that Atlantis the Lost Empire is pretty much just IP theft from Nadia and the Secret of Blue Water.
Click to expand...
I could also see the whines about "exotification" since both women aren't white.
 
Yaoi Huntress Earth said:
I could also see the whines about "exotification" since both women aren't white.
Click to expand...
This seems like a pretty common trap with these sorts of e-SJWs. No brown people in your cast? That's racist because it's exclusionary. A few brown people? That's racist because you're using them as token minorities. A whole lot of brown people? That's racist because it's fetishization. Just can't win these days.
 
Yaoi Huntress Earth said:
Want to see an armor they approve of? It's well-designed, but how does she move in it?
Click to expand...
LOL. It's FO76 "Responder" power armor.

Big fucking deal.

It's about as story telling and powerful as paying $20 to the cash shop and downloading it.

Not featured: The frame that all those armor pieces attach to that make room for her tits.

That it's slow and clunky.

That she's going to take a hit to the face.

That not wearing a helmet means she doesn't have full rad protection.

Oh, and it's probably available on the Nexus right next to an outfit that uses spray on latex on a nude body for all your latex fetish needs in the wasteland.
 
weirdMcGee said:
It's not the worst I've seen, way better than all the uninspired "muh realism" full plate armor I see these fuckers shill all the time. The only thing I change is giving her helmet and there ya go.
Click to expand...
Perhaps, but how is she supposed to move? Unless it’s one of those robotic suit with controls inside I don’t see anyone moving in that suit.
 
Grumpy Pickle Rick said:
Perhaps, but how is she supposed to move? Unless it’s one of those robotic suit with controls inside I don’t see anyone moving in that suit.
Click to expand...
Oh, she just looks like this inside the armor:

main-qimg-847df2c79b8120d67cd2510923cb5efd.png


(In all seriousness, bulky powered armor makes no sense. Human joints just don't work like that.)
 
Grumpy Pickle Rick said:
Perhaps, but how is she supposed to move? Unless it’s one of those robotic suit with controls inside I don’t see anyone moving in that suit.
Click to expand...
The power armor has a frame underneath.
39711-1561675904-1096889570.png

At the wrist are gloves that fit the hand so that the armored hand can replicate hand movements. Feet are on pedals.

39711-1561653901-1619506621.jpeg


Armor is then attached modularly.

3476-2-1448782697.jpg

Here's one where they're not quite put together.

The one BABD is drooling over is an artist's conception of their Fallout 76 character basically wearing this stuff.

No story beyond what FO76 offers. No "OH EM GEE!" how great the imagery is.

It just shows that BABD know jack and shit about the things they demand artwork redone for.

They'd probably gush and squee over these...
43049-1579195854-1413562210.png

They MIGHT bitch over no leg protectcion or lower armor protection, maybe bitch about the crotch plate.
But this is what they say doesn't exist.
38347-1554548239-1922905643.jpeg


It's just hilarious that they spent all their time acting like that power armor is such a big deal.

It's an artists representation of their character in Fallout 76 MMORPG, wearing a "Responder" set of power armor.

It just shows that BABD doesn't look at context at all, nor do they care, and they're pig fucking ignorant.
 
Jet Fuel Johnny said:
The power armor has a frame underneath.
View attachment 2365890
At the wrist are gloves that fit the hand so that the armored hand can replicate hand movements. Feet are on pedals.

View attachment 2365889

Armor is then attached modularly.

View attachment 2365888
Here's one where they're not quite put together.

The one BABD is drooling over is an artist's conception of their Fallout 76 character basically wearing this stuff.

No story beyond what FO76 offers. No "OH EM GEE!" how great the imagery is.

It just shows that BABD know jack and shit about the things they demand artwork redone for.

They'd probably gush and squee over these...
View attachment 2365904
They MIGHT bitch over no leg protectcion or lower armor protection, maybe bitch about the crotch plate.
But this is what they say doesn't exist.
View attachment 2365907

It's just hilarious that they spent all their time acting like that power armor is such a big deal.

It's an artists representation of their character in Fallout 76 MMORPG, wearing a "Responder" set of power armor.

It just shows that BABD doesn't look at context at all, nor do they care, and they're pig fucking ignorant.
Click to expand...
Combat Armor is some of the ugliest armor any game has ever designed, so I'm surprised they don't love it.
 
Corn Flakes said:
The difference is that in non-sexual contexts men don't usually care about fictional men the way the BABD ladies care about fictional women. Conan the Barbarian or Superman having muscles that wouldn't look out of place in a Tom of Finland artbook don't really bother most guys unless the poses, actions or situations they're depicted in are overtly sexual. Hell, that's how softcore gay porn snuck under the radar for many, many years here in America. They just advertised it as "fitness magazines" for men with plenty of shots of scantily-clad men "flexing". Action heroes in the 80s went shirtless all the time and while a lot of these shirtless scenes were for the female (and by extension gay male) crowd, straight guys really don't care whether Rambo has a shirt on or is going bare-chested while blowing up bad guys.
Click to expand...
UnsufficentBoobage said:
Er, to go with direct example, I posted a picture of 80s rock star, cropped out of shot where there was a woman looking at him adoringly, and got multiple complaints that it "reeks of homo" and not to post it.
Click to expand...
I think the culture has changed significantly. Stallone, Arnold and Van Damme were sex symbols/beefcake but also targeted towards men and they did not feel uncomfortable with that. He-Man ran around in fur briefs and almost every action figure was an impossibly swole muscleman(but I wonder if Mattel just said "eh, let's just use the barbie mold for she-ra and call it an action figure"). Jago from Killer Instinct had sliced up pants, exposed midriff and tight, torn top. He's pretty much an example of what babd would dream up as a "what if male characters were dressed like this, wouldn't that be ridiculous?".

Many lols were had over Manowar, but they weren't seen as gay either, they were just New York guidos obsessed with epic fantasy. Behold the magical cat-skin glove!
ohmanowar.jpg
That was mostly recognizable as a Conan/D&D/swords&sorcery style. The dungeon motif isn't even of the sexy kind, it's the dungeon crawler variety. People looking at it now is way more likely to go "gaaay!" than people did in the past, so something has changed.

My point is that I think it's become more important for some people, on a subconscious level, to identify what's gay and what's not now that everything is so hyperfocused on sexuality. It's like, if some people say they're gay the response from others will at some point be "I'm not gay", the 'I am' creates the 'I am not'.

Back in the day men sucking cock was gay, now that isn't necessarily true depending on who you ask. Saying that a man has beautiful eyes can be seen as a sign of attraction to men even though that wouldn't necessarily be true if said in the 40's about Cary Grant.
 
Smaug's Smokey Hole said:
The dungeon motif isn't even of the sexy kind, it's the dungeon crawler variety. People looking at it now is way more likely to go "gaaay!" than people did in the past, so something has changed.
My point is that I think it's become more important for some people, on a subconscious level, to identify what's gay and what's not now that everything is so hyperfocused on sexuality.
Click to expand...
I agree wholeheartidly, and, in fact, my last time talking about this was an attempt to make people think.

But alas, "that is gay, I will keep insisting 80s rockers are gay, nothing ever is not sexual, bla bla I will dress in grey rags and cry that I am not allowed to do fun things I want, because they are gay"*

*not aimed at anyone in particular, just me lamenting men pissing away their right for self-expression

Smaug's Smokey Hole said:
Back in the day men sucking cock was gay
Click to expand...
I hope someday, we are back to it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom