Bikini Armor Battle Damage - Hypocrites and Sexy Art

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I have to give them some credit since they are right that the Fate series can be very unoriginal with their takes on historical characters. Other than that, wait til you see what their newest make over implies.
I wonder what would happen if they discovered Kantai Collection. I think they would have a fucking seizure over that
 
I'm pretty surprised they can't tell the difference between those four characters, tbh. I have literally no experience with the franchise and could tell them apart, despite the heavy similarities.

Spastic or autistic, I wonder.
 
Is that nero redesign parody or for real? Cuz honestly, they could have just made her a read head and given her a Greek dress. That's it..
 
I'm pretty surprised they can't tell the difference between those four characters, tbh. I have literally no experience with the franchise and could tell them apart, despite the heavy similarities.

Spastic or autistic, I wonder.
Lower left is a child and clone (long story, think the Snakes from MGS) of upper left. Of course they're going to look similar and not at the same time. Lower right is a case of "something familiar" fanservice originally for a joke comic but fans liked her enough that they included her in the game.

Is that nero redesign parody or for real? Cuz honestly, they could have just made her a read head and given her a Greek dress. That's it..
It's a terrible dad joke. Haha, Neckbeard Nero's head on a sexy anime girl's body. Got'em! Gamergate btfo'd!
 
We got another redesign. I'll say that their first attempt was the better of the the two (the second one is boring).

I agree. The first one looks like it could fit into the fantasy element despite being made from pettiness. I think it could work pretty well. But that last one though. That is an ugly redesign. It's like the more we see of these designs the more these editors remove all sense of appeal to it. First it starts with the skin, then the outfits, then the colors and so forth. You can not tell me this person looked at the last one and thought, "Yep! All better!" They had a starting design that could've worked and they destroyed it.

The difference between people like these and actual character designers is that professionals or even normal artists know when enough is enough. You have crazy outfits, but many times these character designers are well aware that the overall complexity isn't a determining factor, but how it fits into the overall setting or theme. It's why series like Persona can get away with simple character designs and then they increase the craziness later on. They are supposed to fit with the character motif and theme. Not everything has to be a 1:1 ratio. If that was the case these people would be drawing ancient soldiers butt-naked running into battle. But they don't because they know it's a double standard. Woman naked = bad but men naked = good.
 
807235


What's funny though is that historically male armor was often made to be sexualized. They would have most likely done it with women's armor too, but there historically were very few cases of women in combat.
 
What's funny though is that historically male armor was often made to be sexualized.

Absolutely. I mentioned the Greek "muscle cuirass" a bit upthread but you could probably make a long and very entertaining effortpost just talking about the evolution of the codpiece in military dress. The gigantic ones used by 15th-16th century Landschnekts (who in general were notable for their very impractical and flamboyant uniforms) are particularly funny to me:

807863


YoU CaN'T FiGhT In iMpRaCtIcAl cLoThInG

807866


Don't mind me, just resting my shortsword on my comically oversized armored crotch bulge.
 
View attachment 807235

What's funny though is that historically male armor was often made to be sexualized. They would have most likely done it with women's armor too, but there historically were very few cases of women in combat.
Ah the infamous armor of Sir Lanceatwat. There is a good chance some badass battle broad would have some gratuitous tiddy plate or some metal vagina dentata installed for the intimidation factor. Just because something is practical doesn't mean it needs to be prudish.

Let's not forget topless dueling among ladies back in the day either.
 
Absolutely. I mentioned the Greek "muscle cuirass" a bit upthread but you could probably make a long and very entertaining effortpost just talking about the evolution of the codpiece in military dress. The gigantic ones used by 15th-16th century Landschnekts (who in general were notable for their very impractical and flamboyant uniforms) are particularly funny to me:

View attachment 807863

YoU CaN'T FiGhT In iMpRaCtIcAl cLoThInG

View attachment 807866

Don't mind me, just resting my shortsword on my comically oversized armored crotch bulge.
Lol, it's not even all western, and not even all sexual either. All cultures have worn some pretty impractical shit, just purely for the sake of looking cool on the battlefield.



Ihatedoorways.jpg
 
You think these people will ever have an epiphany and realize that all this impractical armor is not meant for protection, but as a symbol to show how powerful a character is for not having died yet? If your common enemy can cut through the heaviest armor you've got, why bother?
 
Time for another redesigns and of course we get poofy pants.

Okay, I do like the colors on these, but what the hell is with THAT??
808295


These people legitimately put a stitch pattern over her stomach? I CAN'T-you already covered it up. What's the point? And of course as it was mentioned we can't go without puffy pants. Like, yeah you can make it look good (Shantae comes to mind) but when you put it on everything it really starts to get old.
 
Okay, I do like the colors on these, but what the hell is with THAT??
View attachment 808295

These people legitimately put a stitch pattern over her stomach? I CAN'T-you already covered it up. What's the point? And of course as it was mentioned we can't go without puffy pants. Like, yeah you can make it look good (Shantae comes to mind) but when you put it on everything it really starts to get old.
Probably to avoid implying it's a full bodysuit which is obviously sexist. I mean look at Samus. She's practically shaking and shitting herself with embarrassment, and not at all strutting confidently knowing both men and women want her.
 
Absolutely. I mentioned the Greek "muscle cuirass" a bit upthread but you could probably make a long and very entertaining effortpost just talking about the evolution of the codpiece in military dress. The gigantic ones used by 15th-16th century Landschnekts (who in general were notable for their very impractical and flamboyant uniforms) are particularly funny to me:

View attachment 807863

YoU CaN'T FiGhT In iMpRaCtIcAl cLoThInG

View attachment 807866

Don't mind me, just resting my shortsword on my comically oversized armored crotch bulge.
The codpiece did have a practical use in storing valuables before pockets became widespread.
 
Im just going to post these here


 
I've begun to notice that cutting the hair much shorter is another thing they like to do with the redesigns. Also, the redesign seems a little modest for a goddess of love and lust who is known to be vain and is a slut.
 
Back
Top Bottom