Bikini Armor Battle Damage - Hypocrites and Sexy Art

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Oh here’s a conundrum for BABD & co

What if I think women in full & functional plate armor are hotter than half-naked women?

Would they stop covering them up if people thought that was even more attractive than catsuits?
 
I managed to forget the entirety of what I wanted to say about power fantasy vs. objectification (yay to heatwave), so just pasting the picture I planned to use:
tumblr_p8gebtY9fG1ro0ixho1_1280.jpg


Dickleg.
 
Oh here’s a conundrum for BABD & co

What if I think women in full & functional plate armor are hotter than half-naked women?

Would they stop covering them up if people thought that was even more attractive than catsuits?
Well that's the thing, they don't acknowledge it. And if a female character has a more sensible look? They bulk up the armor and turn her into a frumpy dump knuckle-nosed neanderthal because only ugly people those outside traditional beauty standards are strong. And then they slap a big honking erection between the thighs because #transrights or some shit even though people get off to dickgirls too.
 
Oh, “magic meat week” is a satire event for fantasy artists where they draw men in bikinis and bad armor. (Edit: it’s not run by BABD but they do participate, since it’s “relevant”)

Big fucking yikes though if it’s being used against trans women
The problem with BABD and their ilk insisting that their yaoi is "satire" is that they undermine themselves when the supposedly satrical pieces are indistinguishable from their porn. 9/10 times when you follow the link to the artist of the "parody" it turns out they'll have dozens of other pieces exactly like it that are labeled as straightforward porn or fetish material. It calls their motives and credibility into question because whatever point their were trying to make it undercut by how obvious that it is that they're getting off to it - it's especially egregious in BABD's case since there's been multiple instances where they've shared 100% self-admitted fetish art made by someone who doesn't give as shit about bikini armor just to sperg about "muh satire," and sometimes reblogging sources that they could've only found if they'd been following porn blogs. The Hawkeye Initiative got torn a new asshole for the exact same reason when it became clear they couldn't give a shit about their criticisms in favor of having an excuse to indulge kinks and creep on Jeremy Renner.

It's like those fangirls who insist that their ABO dog-dicking, ass-baby making fanfics starring their favorite anime characters is a super cereal examination of gender roles. They can say that all they want, but it won't make it true.

Sexuality is power. Think of Conan, no one thought he was unprotected because he had no armor. Logically he should considering he has no way of deflecting any possible killing blows. But the showing of skin, the showing of muscle exudes power, in the same way, women exude sexuality in their nakedness, that is power. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. "Sex sells" isn't just a catchphrase, it works, it's power.
The other thing to keep in mind is that the line between a sexual fantasy and a power fantasy is pretty much non-existent, and many works are frequently both at the exact same time. If they weren't, there wouldn't be so many women cosplaying the revealing costumes, female artists wouldn't be making their own characters to have skimpy costumes, and 1/5th of Twilight wouldn't have been dedicated to describing Edward's abs. Hell, one of my favorite artists Brian Bolland once made a Wonder Woman cover that he described as almost being like a Rorschach test of fantasy because of how many men and women found the scenario to either be intimidating/powerful or hot.

That's kind of the paradox of BABD, a lot of their arguments tend to hinge on the idea that women don't have any sexual urges of their own - or at least ones that don't line up exactly to BABD's own experiences. Every woman who likes or creates skimpy costumes or bikini armor must not be acting of their own accord (either because of male pressure or attention whoring) and those who disagree with them by design should have less of a say in costume choices than they do. It's why I like to highlight the instances when they REEEE at the 1-2 skimpy designs in series' that have a wide array of design choices; you can't demand "more variety" and then get mad when people who don't like the same things as you still have options.
 
Last edited:
Oh, “magic meat week” is a satire event for fantasy artists where they draw men in bikinis and bad armor.
Uhm, no. It's just sexy art, interspaced with blatant, gross yaoi, that, even if legit of "parody" intent, reaches the lows of a bad hentai game.

That's kind of the paradox of BABD, a lot of their arguments tend to hinge on the idea that women don't have any sexual urges of their own - or at least ones that don't line up exactly to BABD's own experiences.
They just refuse to believe women don't usualy hate themselves as much as they do (as yaoi-crazed gals obviously hate themselves and often entire female population).
 
Uhm, no. It's just sexy art, interspaced with blatant, gross yaoi, that, even if legit of "parody" intent, reaches the lows of a bad hentai game.
Interesting! We must see very different participants in the event then. From what I’ve seen among my own art friends is people who actively hate yaoi fangirl types drawing stupid revealing outfits for shits and giggles. (I’ll admit I’ve never seen the scope of the event very far beyond personal acquaintances)

I wonder how the creators of the event feel about the group of participants you mention and how it became that.
 
Another bingo for them this time a character from xenosaga (which reminds me I should probably it at somepoint in time) https://bikiniarmorbattledamage.tumblr.com/tagged/Xenosaga
So… um… this is a thing worth putting in a video game, apparently
Yes and a decade later they still have fans. Remaster or sequel now.
Also, "racism": 1) The wiki can't be trusted because a majority of it was hijacked by AlexShepherd, who you may know as the Silent Hill sperg obsessed with circumcision.
2) Granted, T-elos is based off a Middle Eastern woman (long story), there's an equally dark skin character in your party.
3) Her actions being described as evil is debateable, she's an antagonist but the worst she's done is take orders from another antagonist.

EDIT: I just realize that they have no right to whine about the artists demonizing sexiness when that's exactly what they do.
 
Last edited:
I have to give them some credit since they are right that the Fate series can be very unoriginal with their takes on historical characters. Other than that, wait til you see what their newest make over implies.
 
I have to give them some credit since they are right that the Fate series can be very unoriginal with their takes on historical characters. Other than that, wait til you see what their newest make over implies.
I will file this under dad joke.

Wow... Seriously? I'm agreeing with the other commentators below because this is pretty transphobic coming from you all. Considering that it's Pride Month too, you all go and make a tasteless 'men in dress' joke despite claiming to try and not do that throughout your articles... Just... Really?
Like, much as I loathe the Fate franchise because of how they ALWAYS design the women (and FYI it DID start out as a self-published Visual Novel Porn before becoming the biggest franchise now!), even I could draw a better 'sexy guy Saber' without poking fun like this. :/
I can't tell if this person is ironic or legit mad.
 
I have to give them some credit since they are right that the Fate series can be very unoriginal with their takes on historical characters. Other than that, wait til you see what their newest make over implies.
I will admit that the sight of historical Nero with big anime tiddies and wearing a frilly dress made me laugh harder than expected.

(At least they didn't butcher the outfit this time!)
 
I fucking love this backlash. Live by faux outrage, due by it. Surprised they kept their weird love/hate tranny fetish so quiet until recently.
 
I have to give them some credit since they are right that the Fate series can be very unoriginal with their takes on historical characters. Other than that, wait til you see what their newest make over implies.

>Scrolls down
"Oh now what? Did they add baggy paints to Saber? Make her fatter for no reason? Made her already ballroom-gown dress even longer-
Oh.
OH NO.

Just..why? I know Fate is full of fanservice to the nth degree, but at least it looks fun. Why would you ever put the historical figure's face on a clearly anime girl body? To add onto that many stone depictions of these historical figures are stylized themselves! Fun Fact: Many times in the olden days people could go their entire lives without seeing their own ruler. As a result, many stone depictions of them are stylized (depending on the time period of course) to make them look better and more appealing to the masses. Fate does the exact same thing. Take an old myth/legend/historical figure and stylizes it to make it more appealing to a modern-day weeb audience. But their version is better? Hypocrites.
 
Back
Top Bottom