Bikini Armor Battle Damage - Hypocrites and Sexy Art

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I thought they were against lack of armor. And that anatomy is atrocious. Her crotch us where her navel should be.
They do have a thing with desexualizing breasts and long for that day. So I guess they think that if they show enough ugly women with weird boobies, men will be turned off enough to stop liking them.

Anyway, on to sexy-dressed men. There's one thing they miss and that is there's a reason why the outfits that Mystique ad White Queen wear looks silly on a man and that's because (in general) men's bodies are shaped differently. So what looks good on a woman will sometimes look unappealing on a man. Also they get disgusted about Bayonetta and Emma for flounting their sexuality despite a woman designing Bayonetta and Emma being a vain person.
 
They do have a thing with desexualizing breasts and long for that day. So I guess they think that if they show enough ugly women with weird boobies, men will be turned off enough to stop liking them.

Anyway, on to sexy-dressed men. There's one thing they miss and that is there's a reason why the outfits that Mystique ad White Queen wear looks silly on a man and that's because (in general) men's bodies are shaped differently. So what looks good on a woman will sometimes look unappealing on a man. Also they get disgusted about Bayonetta and Emma for flounting their sexuality despite a woman designing Bayonetta and Emma being a vain person.


they don't look too bad. remove the top of what the right is wearing and maybe give them the left guy some pants and we golden.
 
They do have a thing with desexualizing breasts and long for that day. So I guess they think that if they show enough ugly women with weird boobies, men will be turned off enough to stop liking them.

Anyway, on to sexy-dressed men. There's one thing they miss and that is there's a reason why the outfits that Mystique ad White Queen wear looks silly on a man and that's because (in general) men's bodies are shaped differently. So what looks good on a woman will sometimes look unappealing on a man. Also they get disgusted about Bayonetta and Emma for flounting their sexuality despite a woman designing Bayonetta and Emma being a vain person.
Also couldn’t help but notice that the original artist is some guy from Taiwan who just likes drawing superhero porn with no political intent or motive to speak of, so this appears to be another case of of BABD hijacking a porn post to soapbox about how much they hate sexy costumes.
 
So, what does the original give us? Amazingly washed out monochromatic color palette, generic witch hat, bare thighs and shoulders, majorly over-designed bone ornamentation that looks super stabby (not to mention, frames her boobs)… and, of course, male version which looks nothing alike.
How is it monochrome if there’s subtle shades of gray and green in her outfit? Unless you count the bone trim on her collar, the rest looks like it could be a print (which dares goes around her breasts).
 
Just thinking about it, wouldn't it be unrealistic to have multiple, clearly weapon caused, deep scars on their face? How many times did that axe and sword barely hit them? It's not like someone swings an axe and just cuts their lip, multiple times.

Aesthetic battle scars should be thrown into their pile of unrealism.
Fuck you, Amerikanski don't talk shit about my Russian Mafia waifu
IMG_0847.JPG
IMG_0848.JPG
 
Fuck you, Amerikanski don't talk shit about my Russian Mafia waifu

Interesting you bring Balalaika up.

In the source canon of Black Lagoon, she served with the Russian Army in Afghanistan and was tortured with a blowtorch by the Mujahadden, which left her with severe burn scars, and while she's called disparagingly "Fry Face" by some of the dumber assholes in the show/manga, an artbook revealed the scars cover a fair portion of her upper body as well.

By comparison, scars from axes and swords should be just as ugly and deep, if more narrow in appearance due to the shape of the weapon used to disfigure the target, so the idiots who drew grazing flesh scars from weapons that would leave deep, long scars really should have looked into how scars actually work, as Rei Hiroe's Balalaika actually has scars that resemble IRL burn trauma by comparison.
 
:old: but that's what aesthetic means, meant for appearance.

For content, a woman that actually got a serious injury in a war zone(lost her eye).
View attachment 581160

Self quoting because I realized I didn't provide information on this. That's Marie Colvin, a journalist, who was injured in in Sri Lanka back in 2001 and instead of seeking medical care she decided to meet her deadline instead of seeking medical care. She lost her eye that time, then lost her life because shouting "JOURNALIST!" is not actually a spell that protects someone from bullets, bombs and mortars...
 
How is it monochrome if there’s subtle shades of gray and green in her outfit? Unless you count the bone trim on her collar, the rest looks like it could be a print (which dares goes around her breasts).

I assume the artist (if you can call them that) meant monochromatic which can refer to any scheme of the same hue, but I don't think they're using it in the right context.

That being said the redesign is mehhhh. If they wanted to do puffy pants, why make them so low hanging? Why not make the skirt a bit longer for their tastes or hell, make a Chinese styled dress skirt for them? Or even better? Make a skeleton lady to equal out with the skeleton guy? (I don't know the context of this thing, so correct me if I'm wrong)

There are many ways to make a balanced design without destroying any appeal to it. You can show skin, that doesn't necessarily mean you're sexy. You can also have someone fully covered. That doesn't mean they're a prude either. It's like there's NO BALANCE whatsoever.
 

I was about to say....the edit wasn't a bad one, but what the hell happened to the face? It look so wrong and scrunched up and it doesn't fit the style. This edit looks more fitting honestly. And I give them credit, they didn't going entire full-burqa with the clothes.

But at the same time, if the face was bothering them...why didn't they just redraw it in their style? The short hair looks nicer, but the whole facial reconstruction surgery is really bizarre to me.
 
It seems like BABD is going further off the deep end. They used to just bitch about scantly clad women and "fixing" them, but now they want the women to be uglier.
 
It seems like BABD is going further off the deep end. They used to just bitch about scantly clad women and "fixing" them, but now they want the women to be uglier.

Makes me wonder how EXACTLY ugly and/or self-hating the owner of the blog is. She seems to have a personal grudge against any woman more sexually appealing than she is, fictional or real.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom