Bikini Armor Battle Damage - Hypocrites and Sexy Art

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The opposite of that are misogynistic mean girls who are at best not interested in anyone with a vagina in their media and at worst are outright hostile to it. As has been noted elsewhere these girls see all other female protags as competition, and threatening to their guy on guy and/or OC jill material.

If there was ever any merit to shows like Gundam Wing, I could never tell because the fanbase turned me off with their constantly blithering about their pairings or shrieking about, "THAT WHORE RELENA."


Ironically, these are the first ones to complain about shitty female protagonists, and do the kind of shit BBAD does. Yet, whenever I've tried to introduce female centered anime, stories, any kind of media they just sniff at it, turn their noses up at it, and declare that the male characters more interesting/better written.

I don't know what to tell you if you didn't find Vanessa Ives whose existence is the reason Penny Dreadful's story exists, or Taraji Henson/Carter's arc from Person of Interest remotely engaging.

This is why female protagonists like Ellen Ripley don't seem to register a blip on their radar anymore, if they ever did.
Ironically it's dudes who keep referencing those mainstays and paying homages.

A lot of those types of women say they're feminists too. To them a "shitty female character" is just a female character that showed weakness once. I've heard this lodged against Casca and Riza Hawkeye(both pretty strong female characters in their own right). They think the fact that they got saved by a man that it means their character is shit even though they have about as much depth as their male counterparts. They'd probably say a Mary Sue like character is a strong female character even though she doesn't have as much depth as the "shitty female characters." Because to them kicking ass and never having any problems or showing any weaknesses = strong female character
 
Here is a great piss take of BBAD's style of critic as here we have a either a Roman Republic warrior or a Greek Hoplite.

I love how you can use historical examples of armor to dismiss a great deal of their points.

That reminds me of how the Romans had to stop an invasion and invent better arm-armor because people kept chopping off their soldier's arms.
 
We got their update on the previous costume with their version (it's nice, but it could be a little better tailored to her body) and how horribly sexualized and impractical Zantana's outfit is. I've always loved Zantana's old-school stage magician with a Las Vegas flair outfit. It proves that not every DC comics magic user has to be dark and other than the exposed legs, it's not that sexualized.

It looks like a straight-up genderbend. They missed a good opportunity and it makes their rant against Zantana's outfit (which, as always, misses the entire point of the character) look even more ridiculous.
 
It looks like a straight-up genderbend. They missed a good opportunity and it makes their rant against Zantana's outfit (which, as always, misses the entire point of the character) look even more ridiculous.
SJW arts tend to not like Zantana'soutfit. It proves that you don't have to be dark or serious to be a superhero magic user. You can be fun and quirky as well.
 
A lot of those types of women say they're feminists too. To them a "shitty female character" is just a female character that showed weakness once. I've heard this lodged against Casca and Riza Hawkeye(both pretty strong female characters in their own right). They think the fact that they got saved by a man that it means their character is shit

Because men don't ever save other men in comics/anime/movies all the time.... in fact, no man has ever been rescued in the history of fiction, right? And if you can find an instance of that, well, it doesn't count because reasons.

And poor Princess Leia obviously internalized misogyny, why else would she sneak into Jabba's palace to break out Han? Couldn't he just flex his muscles and bust out of that carbonite anytime he wanted to? He was a guy, right?
 
Because men don't ever save other men in comics/anime/movies all the time.... in fact, no man has ever been rescued in the history of fiction, right? And if you can find an instance of that, well, it doesn't count because reasons.

And poor Princess Leia obviously internalized misogyny, why else would she sneak into Jabba's palace to break out Han? Couldn't he just flex his muscles and bust out of that carbonite anytime he wanted to? He was a guy, right?
He was just pandering to her so she could feel like she accomplished something. Han jumped back into the Carbonite just before she showed up. Before that he and Jabba were bro-ing it up - drinking Coors and leering at slave girls in a very disputable fashion.
 
He was just pandering to her so she could feel like she accomplished something. Han jumped back into the Carbonite just before she showed up. Before that he and Jabba were bro-ing it up - drinking Coors and leering at slave girls in a very disputable fashion.
Am I evil for wanting to see this scene in like a blooper reel?
 
We got their update on the previous costume with their version (it's nice, but it could be a little better tailored to her body) and how horribly sexualized and impractical Zantana's outfit is. I've always loved Zantana's old-school stage magician with a Las Vegas flair outfit. It proves that not every DC comics magic user has to be dark and other than the exposed legs, it's not that sexualized.


Like as, I'm gonna be honest. I never found fancy suits sexy. I just found them to look good. I will never be able to understand my own gender's obsession with tuxedos...no wonder the onecler and black hat are so popular with these twats.
 
That reminds me of how the Romans had to stop an invasion and invent better arm-armor because people kept chopping off their soldier's arms.
Dacians. to be fair they were using these bastard things which were specifically good at punching through a shield and ripping off whatever limb was behind it
b7JMB9I.jpg
 
BABD said:
with all do respect to Glen Murakami’s cartoon Starfire design, flying in a skirt is just the worst idea
Well, you could always wear shorts underneath if it’s long enough. Or use your powers against any perverts who take a peek.
 
Not sure if this has been already mentioned, but something I bet these spergs have never read is that wearing clothes while fighting in ye olden times was generally a poor idea given that if cloth got into the wound there was a very strong chance of infection. Hence why even towards the modern era there were cases of soldiers fighting shirtless or even less clothing because they didn't want to run the risk of infection
 
Well, you could always wear shorts underneath if it’s long enough. Or use your powers against any perverts who take a peek.

Or hire an artist that don't draw upskirt shots, problem solved. If anyone tries to imagine people peeping at the panties when someones flying because it's somehow realistic that someone would do that they're pretty much this:
 
My biggest problem is that the name of their dumb site is extra bad too. If I look away from my monitor I forget what the fuck it is. Why not just "Bikini Battle Armor" or "Bikini Armor Damage?"
Fuck. Get your branding straight.
 
Ozzie thinks that not only can characters can’t choose their own costumess, but they also can’t choose their sexuality or possess free will. With this kind of convoluted logic, the characters might as well be enslaved to their writers and artists.

That's actually a very common excuse coming from the "fandom feminists" who get personally offended at the existence of sexually-attractive female characters. Often coming from the same hypocrites that turn around and shout "ALL THESE CHARACTERS ARE TRANS/GAYS/LESBIANS/ SRY I DON'T MAKE THE RULES", because it's okay for THEM to fetishize fictional characters but not for the people that created these charas in the first place. :story:
 
That's actually a very common excuse coming from the "fandom feminists" who get personally offended at the existence of sexually-attractive female characters. Often coming from the same hypocrites that turn around and shout "ALL THESE CHARACTERS ARE TRANS/GAYS/LESBIANS/ SRY I DON'T MAKE THE RULES", because it's okay for THEM to fetishize fictional characters but not for the people that created these charas in the first place. :story:
These rules never hold to sexy male characters they find attractive.
 
Back
Top Bottom