Bikini Armor Battle Damage - Hypocrites and Sexy Art

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
If old cliches are true, but who would put up with them to try? Lesbienne sex doesn't count.
 
GethN7 said:
They are perverts who masturbate to sexy men but hate sexy women.

Fine, I can dig that, I just wish they be honest enough to admit it.

Double standards are never good, but I can give some respect to people who admit they live by them and don't apologize for it.
Click to expand...

I'm sure if they turned the site into some sort of modelling site where they just posted themselves in skimpy cosplay outfits they'd get some male fans, no matter what they looked like. That'd solve their jealously issue. They can just imagine the comments are all from guys that look like Channing Tatum.
 
Pina Colada said:
"lol, who cares about characterization and lore in our redesigns?"
Click to expand...
I like how they say "don't use thermian arguments" and it's a link to a Dan Olson video. On lore and redesign, they could of make a redesign that adheres to lore but then again, they likely won't give a shit. Also gotta note the ArenaNet sperging they do. They link an article of a guy told his critics to "go fuck themselves". They also believe Price did nothing wrong (in their eyes) and lost her job.
ArenaNet Sperging or Price did nothing wrong.png


Link to the guy they use as a comparison.
http://archive.is/tX6jQ
 
I love how they go an entire rant about how destroyable armor makes no sense in a purposefully cartoonish game about battling monsters when the mechanic itself appears to function as a the full health stage. That's like complaining that it makes no sense that Mario shrinks to half his size when he takes a hit; though I'm sure if another game introduced a similar mechanic on a female character, we'd be seeing an entire essay about how it's a metaphor for emotional abuse and their self esteem being eaten away by patriarchy or some such nonsense.

Also as an aside, it really highlights how little BABD understands story design, and how little research evidently goes into these posts when they make comments like "LOL Satan lives in Hades? What fucking moron came up with that?" when a quick Google search reveals that 'hades' was used as both the name of the God of the Dead as well as the afterlife in Ancient Greece, and in the New Testament 'hades' was the word often used to refer to hell. Kinda sums up BABD quite nicely really.
 
Yaoi Huntress Earth said:
Even the classic Ghost 'N Goblins where destroyed armor is played for laughs isn't safe from their desire to ban armor that gets destroyed.
Click to expand...

I love how they pretend to give a shit about Ghost N' Goblins and its armor damage, but soon act like whiny bitches about a completely unrelated game that has female characters looking shocked and troubled when THEIR armors get fucked.

(And why wouldn't they get scared? If I was in a similar situation, I'd fucking panic and freak out because I could get killed over it!)
 
Last edited:
One Man Bland said:
I love how they go an entire rant about how destroyable armor makes no sense in a purposefully cartoonish game about battling monsters when the mechanic itself appears to function as a the full health stage. That's like complaining that it makes no sense that Mario shrinks to half his size when he takes a hit; though I'm sure if another game introduced a similar mechanic on a female character, we'd be seeing an entire essay about how it's a metaphor for emotional abuse and their self esteem being eaten away by patriarchy or some such nonsense.

Also as an aside, it really highlights how little BABD understands story design, and how little research evidently goes into these posts when they make comments like "LOL Satan lives in Hades? What fucking moron came up with that?" when a quick Google search reveals that 'hades' was used as both the name of the God of the Dead as well as the afterlife in Ancient Greece, and in the New Testament 'hades' was the word often used to refer to hell. Kinda sums up BABD quite nicely really.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure these ladies legitimately have autism. I've seen them bitch about Bikini Warriors ( https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=17084) before even though it's a blatant joke show taking the piss out of sexy armor.
 
Ruin said:
I'm pretty sure these ladies legitimately have autism. I've seen them bitch about Bikini Warriors ( https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=17084) before even though it's a blatant joke show taking the piss out of sexy armor.
Click to expand...

I've seen a few episodes, it's definitely mocking the shit out of the concept, though I don't expect BBAD to understand parody sometimes involves taking something they don't like to absurd extremes specifically to show how silly it is at all.
 
c-no said:
I like how they say "don't use thermian arguments" and it's a link to a Dan Olson video. On lore and redesign, they could of make a redesign that adheres to lore but then again, they likely won't give a shit. Also gotta note the ArenaNet sperging they do. They link an article of a guy told his critics to "go fuck themselves". They also believe Price did nothing wrong (in their eyes) and lost her job.
View attachment 498333

Link to the guy they use as a comparison.
http://archive.is/tX6jQ
Click to expand...

I know it's a few days late but i love how they start by saying "if you dislike our redesigns your argument doesn't count" and then finish by saying a veteran comic book artist can't take criticism. I can't help but chuckle at the lack of self awareness.
 
GethN7 said:
I've seen a few episodes, it's definitely mocking the shit out of the concept, though I don't expect BBAD to understand parody sometimes involves taking something they don't like to absurd extremes specifically to show how silly it is at all.
Click to expand...
While the show mocks a concept, BBAD not understanding parody going at absurd lengths is something they'd try to justify by saying it's just some way to justify fan service. I remember some time ago in either this thread or SJW art extremes how there existed some anime that may of mocked the concept of skimpy armor. BBAD more or less thought it was just some excuse to show titties iirc.
 
c-no said:
While the show mocks a concept, BBAD not understanding parody going at absurd lengths is something they'd try to justify by saying it's just some way to justify fan service. I remember some time ago in either this thread or SJW art extremes how there existed some anime that may of mocked the concept of skimpy armor. BBAD more or less thought it was just some excuse to show titties iirc.
Click to expand...
It was Bikini Warriors, as discussed above.
 
Computery Guy said:
I'm not entirely sure how I feel about the assumption that women see attractive women actors as "competition". I figure it's more modern political discourse "training" them to assume that if a women isn't dressed like a nun, it's "male gaze" and nothing else about her matters, she's walking tits. And therefore, women raise a fucking ruckus about it no matter how well said character is written.
Click to expand...

No I think there's something to what she was saying. Rey, Emma Watson and Kristen Stewart are all good examples of plain women (at best) that play lead roles in their most memorable films. None of these women can really hold a candle to the starlets of the past when it comes to beauty.

It wouldn't surprise me if Hollywood was pushing uglier actresses to accommodate the feelings of liberal women. Look at 50 Shades of Grey. The whole premise of the movie is about a boring, dull woman who gets pursued by a rich, well-dressed, skilled, and good looking prime alpha male. They all want this to be them.

I miss scantily clad, full figured barbarian girls from the 90s. the 2000s suck.
 
FightenGnome said:
No I think there's something to what she was saying. Rey, Emma Watson and Kristen Stewart are all good examples of plain women (at best) that play lead roles in their most memorable films. None of these women can really hold a candle to the starlets of the past when it comes to beauty.

I miss scantily clad, full figured barbarian girls from the 90s. the 2000s suck.
Click to expand...
While I wouldn't include Emma Watson on that list, there has definitely been a rise in the Plain Janes. The funny thing is that all these characters get called Mary Sues, though they are plot-wise, for being able to get romantic with men despite them being paperbag-on-head ugly for Hollywood standards or "too plain." So we've reached the opposite end of focusing on women in media as "too plain," because media started to accomodate garden trolls' wish fulfillment, but nobody wants that either. Now we single out female characters for being too plain and her character is put to the side.

When I look at a character like Harley Quinn (pre-Nu52 because fuck that, lol), whether she's hot or not doesn't enter into what I think about her because she's not entirely defined by her looks. She's a crazy bitch fanatically devoted to an abusive asshole with no empathy. Poison Ivy could be used as a counterpoint, but you don't end at "she's sexy." She's got other qualities besides being sexual, which tie into her character as a whole. If someone asked you to describe Bella Swan/50 Shades of Grey Bella Swan/Rey, what would you say besides "plain and Mary Sue"?

When people talk about Xena, they talk about how she was a badass, had a fiery temper, and was passionate about achieving her goals, her "skimpy armor" is a footnote to that.
 
Last edited:
https://archive.is/fDjZ0

there take on the she-ra controversy.

Here’s hoping that if this series catches on, then maybe a He-Man reboot comes next, this time turning all the gay undertones into overtones and angering dudebros even more.
~Ozzie
Click to expand...


so they want their yoai fantasy disguised as gay male repseationtion to come true eh?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom