Bikini Armor Battle Damage - Hypocrites and Sexy Art

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Hummingbird said:
Now that I think about it and the previous post, I'm surprised that he doesn't dislike that giant woman from the new Resident Evil game when she's got big boobs, cleavage and men find her sexy.
Click to expand...
Like most terminally online idiots these days, Wincenworks cooms for unrealistically tall/strong women. Remember: it's fine if they like it, it's wrong if we like it.
 
SadLonelyLoser said:
The original design for the Dark Queen had half of her face covered by her hair most of the time. It was clearly meant to give her a feeling of mystery and allure. This was clearly too interesting for the new Battletoads so I'm glad they scrapped it in favor of a more bland design.

Seriously, why this Dark Queen looks like it fits in with the cast of High Guardian Spice?
Click to expand...
I'm more curious why the new Dark Queen has yaoi-hands.

SadLonelyLoser said:
I cannot begin to comprehend Wincenworks argument here. Audiences are more likely to sympathize with a female villain so writers write sympathetic female villains and this is somehow a bad thing? Besides, the character designs are taken from Japanese folklore which prominently feature attractive women who lead unsuspecting men to various dooms. Adapting Japanese horror into your game is worth a thesis apparently.
Click to expand...
Maybe they're like the makers of 5th ed. Ravenloft where they think any female who has any vulnerability (like wanting love while being straight, being in danger or a femme fatale, etc) makes you a weak/problematic character.
 
Hummingbird said:
Anyway, today's debate is about evil women and even if you had one that didn't start out as a victim, the league of fictional women's rights would still complain.
Click to expand...
It's funny he mentions Hisako in a favorable light here. For two reasons.

1) Hisako is a character from Killer Instinct, and this character appears to be damn near 1:1 in terms of story with Hisako. At least, the story he presents in his nearly unintelligible style of writing. I can tell he's mad that some woman is victimized and that she's wearing revealing clothing, but I can tell basically nothing about what he's actually mad at.

Edit: I also don't think her being in revealing clothing is sexy or in any way supposed to be sexy. It displays the grotesqueness of her form far more than having her be clothed would which I am 100% sure they were going for, and also 100% sure that KI would've at least tried if they weren't going for a T rating.

2) Only fags like Hisako. Worst designed character in all of KI gameplay wise, and bottom half style wise.
 
Re: Sexy Hisako

hisako.jpg


"Cover your shoulders, you whore!"

Seriously, anyone who pops a boner to this has several very significant mental issues.
 
Why is this guy so angry that people like sexy things? He’s acting like this is ubiquitous and pushed on us from every corner. Whining about a niche product for a niche audience feels kind of wasteful.

Edit: who am I kidding these are the people who had an aneurism when a comic book had a limited edition pin-up variant cover. I guarantee that this guy is projecting and he’s a total coomer in secret.
 
Airbrushed Van Art said:
Why is this guy so angry that people like sexy things? He’s acting like this is ubiquitous and pushed on us from every corner. Whining about a niche product for a niche audience feels kind of wasteful.

Edit: who am I kidding these are the people who had an aneurism when a comic book had a limited edition pin-up variant cover. I guarantee that this guy is projecting and he’s a total coomer in secret.
Click to expand...
With the way he "praises" scantly clad/topless men makes me wonder.
 
I'm calling it now, this guy has some skeletons in the closet that he's trying to hide, I get not wanting to see titties thrown at you at any corner, but this guy makes puritans look reasonable.
 
Moral Decay said:
Somebody should call them... sexist? transphobic? for assuming the lump of plastic is male just because it's a skeleton. Very problematic behavior.
Click to expand...

I'm leaning more towards a representative from the company Sideshow Originals calling them idiot busy bodies. These collectable figures are aimed at an extremely niche audience so yes they are going to make the female figure attractive to increase the appeal of it and its potential sales. I would really like for someone from the company to straight up call out Wince and Ozzy and tell them to STFU and that this product is not for them and since they have no intention to buy the company's products their opinion could be considered a slanderous review damaging to their business.
 
Belvedere said:
I'm leaning more towards a representative from the company Sideshow Originals calling them idiot busy bodies. These collectable figures are aimed at an extremely niche audience so yes they are going to make the female figure attractive to increase the appeal of it and its potential sales. I would really like for someone from the company to straight up call out Wince and Ozzy and tell them to STFU and that this product is not for them and since they have no intention to buy the company's products their opinion could be considered a slanderous review damaging to their business.
Click to expand...
Damaging precedent for free speech aside, a whole plethora of lawsuits getting laid on these perpetually offended busybodies (and others like them) would be funny as hell.
 
Belvedere said:
I'm leaning more towards a representative from the company Sideshow Originals calling them idiot busy bodies.
Click to expand...
This is one of those cases where ignoring them is the best policy. Nobody that takes babd is interested in purchasing the things he rails against to begin with; rather they use him as confirmation for their own biases and beliefs. Addressing the complaints, even to just call them the stupid whining they are, would only validate them and encourage more. If they were to address them, it would have to be with such overwhelming legal force as to utterly destroy the lives of everyone involved, to ensure that none follow behind. The risks inherent in that approach are innumerable.
 
Moral Decay said:
Somebody should call them... sexist? transphobic? for assuming the lump of plastic is male just because it's a skeleton. Very problematic behavior.
Click to expand...
Years ago I read that pretty much all skeleton figures are "female". Well, the pelvis is, at least, since the wider placement of the legs gives more stability. No idea if it's at all true (though it was in a model magazine interview with a mold maker) but it's made me laugh ever since.
 
Shig O'nella said:
Years ago I read that pretty much all skeleton figures are "female". Well, the pelvis is, at least, since the wider placement of the legs gives more stability. No idea if it's at all true (though it was in a model magazine interview with a mold maker) but it's made me laugh ever since.
Click to expand...
Abjectly untrue. The female pelvis provides a wider pubic gap and throws the tailbone out further because it needs to accomodate the head of a baby. In forensics and archaeology, the easiest way to sex a skeleton is to look at the pelvis. And as bipedal animals, humans can't get away with having super wide pelvises because we need to be able to walk straight. If we went with "wider for stability" as an evolutionary strategy, we'd all walk like chimpanzees, though childbirth would be much easier.
 
RazorBackBacon said:
Abjectly untrue. The female pelvis provides a wider pubic gap and throws the tailbone out further because it needs to accomodate the head of a baby. In forensics and archaeology, the easiest way to sex a skeleton is to look at the pelvis. And as bipedal animals, humans can't get away with having super wide pelvises because we need to be able to walk straight. If we went with "wider for stability" as an evolutionary strategy, we'd all walk like chimpanzees, though childbirth would be much easier.
Click to expand...
I think he just means that skeleton minis are usually "female" because the wider stance allows them to stand more easily on a base, particularly with that wide semi-squat you see monster miniatures in.

1677020309345.png


I don't think I buy it, though.
 
Null brought up an interesting point on a MATI about this. He said hes with the wiminz on the critique of skimpy armor. He said luring males and sapphos like me in with sex appeal to a fake character is deceptive and they're trying to manipulate you into spending money.


Anyways have a meme I like:
1677431382944.png
 
Meiwaku said:
Null brought up an interesting point on a MATI about this. He said hes with the wiminz on the critique of skimpy armor. He said luring males and sapphos like me in with sex appeal to a fake character is deceptive and they're trying to manipulate you into spending money.


Anyways have a meme I like:
View attachment 4636460
Click to expand...
wtf i love korean MMOs now
 
Meiwaku said:
Null brought up an interesting point on a MATI about this. He said hes with the wiminz on the critique of skimpy armor. He said luring males and sapphos like me in with sex appeal to a fake character is deceptive and they're trying to manipulate you into spending money.


Anyways have a meme I like:
View attachment 4636460
Click to expand...
Honestly if you took the Japanese/American male character and put him in the Korean male outfit it'd just be a Conan MMO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom