Bikes vs. Business - A hardware store’s closing in Logan Square brings to a head the rising tensions over protected bike lanes.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
BY EDWARD ROBERT MCCLELLAND
ILLUSTRATION BY NICK LU
MARCH 22, 2023, 12:14 PM

1679834973327.png

Gillman’s Ace Hardware, on Milwaukee Avenue in Logan Square, was a relic of an older Chicago. Opened in 1948, when the neighborhood was primarily Polish, Jewish, and German, Gillman’s sold hammers, nails, keys, and caulk for generations, thriving through the influx of Latinos, then “artists and tech people,” as owner Alan Gillman, whose father and uncle founded the business, puts it. A hand-lettered sign read “Asile #3: Light Fixtures, Fuses, Brakers, Screws.” Despite the misspellings, Gillman kept the sign up. It gave the store character.

Gillman’s plans to close by end of this month, unable, its owner says, to survive an innovation of a newer Chicago: protected bike lanes. In October 2020, the city installed plastic bollards in front of the shop, which is on a section of Milwaukee designated by the Chicago Department of Transportation as a “high-crash corridor,” with a disproportionate number of injury-causing collisions involving cars, bikes, or pedestrians. The bollards blocked off parking on Gillman’s side of the street. A year in, Gillman began noticing a decline in sales. “I had customers calling, saying, ‘Al, I’d like to patronize you, but there’s nowhere to park.’ ” They were driving to Menards, he says, rather than schlepping a 60-pound bucket of paint a few blocks.

Businesses have complained about protected bike lanes since they were first installed in 2011 by Mayor Rahm Emanuel, an avid cyclist who promised to make Chicago the nation’s “most bike-friendly city.” But the city has gotten more serious about the program, as cyclists demand safer streets in response to a series of fatal collisions, including one last June that killed 3-year-old Lily Grace Shambrook. By the end of this year, CDOT plans to install concrete barriers on the existing 41.8 miles of protected lanes and to add even more lanes.

In principle, no one is opposed to this practice — who can be against safer cycling? — but merchants complain the barriers are going in without their input and without plans to replace the parking spaces they eliminate.

Three months after George Bumbaris opened George’s Deep Dish on Clark Street in Edgewater in May 2021, protected lanes cut 12 spaces in front of his takeout pizzeria. “I have a lot of customers who stopped coming because they have nowhere to park,” he says. With the help of 48th Ward alderman Harry Osterman’s office, Bumbaris rented two 15-minute spaces around the corner on Thome Avenue, for $1,100 a year, but they’re often illegally occupied, he says. He estimates business is down 10 to 20 percent, and is considering moving.

Despite Bumbaris’s misgivings, Osterman thinks the protected lanes will boost business on that stretch of Clark Street. “I’m a big believer that when you add bike infrastructure, it makes streets more pedestrian friendly, which will lead to more commerce,” he says. (One Clark Street business that has benefited: Gary’s Cycle Shop, a block from Bumbaris’s pizzeria. “It’s been a bit of an advantage for us,” says owner Richard Kerwer.)

Backing Osterman’s contention: a Portland State University study of several cities that found adding bike infrastructure “either had positive or nonsignificant impacts on corridor employment and sales.” New York City says that after it replaced parking spaces with bike lanes on a street in Queens, area business sales increased 12 percent.

That’s because cyclists travel slowly enough to notice businesses and can easily stop to patronize them, say bicycle advocates. If small businesses are feeling a dip, Amazon is the more likely culprit, says Jim Merrell, managing director of advocacy for the Active Transportation Alliance: “I don’t think anyone would say Milwaukee Avenue is a dead zone.”

Andersonville may be the next battleground. With its walkable strip of bars and boutiques, Andersonville would seem a natural to benefit from protected bike lanes, yet businesses there have reservations. In January, the city held a virtual public meeting for Clark Street Crossroads, a proposal to improve the one-mile stretch of Clark between Montrose and Foster Avenues. The suggested changes include installing a protected lane and moving all parking to the street’s west side. During the meeting, Chicago Department of Planning and Development commissioner Maurice Cox noted that the lane is “at the top of the list” but the department will be “talking to businesses along this corridor and finding out what they need.”

The Andersonville Chamber of Commerce is leery, especially after hearing grousing farther north on Clark, where barriers have already gone in. “We get a lot of calls from the businesses there that it’s destroying their business,” says the chamber’s director of business services, David Oakes. “You have to look at the whole ecosystem before putting in bollards and concrete.”

Whatever their effect on business, protected bike lanes are making Chicago safer, and not just for cyclists. Since bollards and curb extensions were installed on Milwaukee, and the speed limit was reduced, collisions have decreased 56 percent, according to CDOT. Nonetheless, Logan Square businesses are playing a more assertive role in plans for future lanes, says Nilda Esparza, director of the Logan Square Chamber of Commerce. This winter, adding a protected lane on California Avenue between North and Diversey was the top vote-getter on the 1st Ward’s participatory budgeting ballot, which allows constituents to weigh in on how to spend $1.5 million earmarked for infrastructure. Chamber officials made regular visits to stores on California “to ensure we inform our operators of these installation plans early so they’re heard and can participate in this process,” Esparza says.

She adds: “While statistics show bike lanes do stir foot traffic, some of our small business operators don’t have the luxury of having this play out for them. Some businesses experienced a 30 percent dip in sales after protected bike lanes were installed near the hardware store.”

Even if protected bike lanes do bring in more customers, that doesn’t mean they’ll be good for every business. Whenever a city changes, there are winners and losers. A neighborhood hardware store, already an atavism, turned out to be a casualty of what a planning official called “a mode shift away from a reliance on private vehicles.”

Still, Gillman thinks it must be possible to accommodate both bikers and businesses. “To take someone’s food off their table,” he laments.  “They could have narrowed the sidewalks. They could have had those bike lanes going down side streets. My dad always said, ‘No matter what, recession, depression, we’ll still be able to eat.’ Then came bike lanes.”

Source (Archive)
 
I remember hearing how restaurants in some pedestrian only areas, the type of city the urbanites dream about, closing because of decreased foot traffic.
 
I remember hearing how restaurants in some pedestrian only areas, the type of city the urbanites dream about, closing because of decreased foot traffic.
When cities were closing roads for restaurants to use tents outside, it killed the other businesses on those roads. The urbanites, restaurants, and government didn't care as if outdoor restaurants as an aesthetic was the plan all along.
 
When cities were closing roads for restaurants to use tents outside, it killed the other businesses on those roads. The urbanites, restaurants, and government didn't care as if outdoor restaurants as an aesthetic was the plan all along.
The same thing has happened in different downtown areas in my part of Kiwi Land. In places where local government approved temporary (and indefinitely-extended) closures of key thoroughfares to allow outdoor COVID tents, businesses on those stretches now have less foot traffic because people have to park farther away. Some people aren't willing to park father away and walk longer distances, especially when the weather is bad. Also, delivery trucks for businesses along these barricaded roads now have to park farther away - usually someplace that disrupts traffic flow in the surrounding area or blocks traffic in one direction while the delivery is made.

In one such place, the local officials have rubber stamped their approval of each and every request to extend the time the barricades remain in place because the business owners like the calming effect the lack of traffic has (or some other similar BS reason) with no regard for guests and potential customers unfamiliar with the closures. Traffic headed downtown there must make a 90 degree turn on the west end of the barricades and traffic on the east end has to take a detour through a narrow one-way alley if it wishes to take the shortest possible alternate route.

In another city where officials admitted to a peak hour downtown parking shortage before COVID, they allowed restaurants to put up temporary COVID tents that took up a number of the already-scarce metered parking spots - some of which might have been required handicapped spaces. The officials also approved a request to barricade an entire block that was once renamed and promoted by the city in an effort to attract more traffic and upscale businesses/restaurants. As stated above, any benefits from the temporary tents have been offset by the lack of foot traffic and inconvenience of receiving deliveries.

Additionally for the above closure, it's been recently proposed that the closure lead to the creation of a permanent pedestrian plaza on that stretch that would allow the outdoor seating to become permanent and an extension of the de facto pedestrian mall created years ago across the street. However, the latter stretch hasn't seen much pedestrian traffic since it was created because it goes between the back walls of various businesses with neither seating nor other pedestrian-friendly amenities in the half-block stretch before it becomes the one-way exit for an alley.

Meanwhile, more underutilized bike lanes have popped up in the region along with mid-road pedestrian islands that make it more difficult for road crews to shift traffic over for temporary road construction and closures when there's now only one lane on either side of the island.

To make matters worse, a new construction project recently kicked off which involves taking a lane away in each direction of a busy divided highway to add bike lanes on a stretch of roadway that has continuous traffic flow and 35-45 mph (approx. 55-70 km/h) speed limits.
Edited for spelling and clarity.
 
Last edited:
That’s because cyclists travel slowly enough to notice businesses and can easily stop to patronize them, say bicycle advocates.
They're lying shits and repeating a lie that egregious means the author is too.
 
Opened in 1948, when the neighborhood was primarily Polish, Jewish, and German, Gillman’s sold hammers, nails, keys, and caulk for generations, thriving through the influx of Latinos, then “artists and tech people,”
the hardware store was doomed when the demographics of the neighborhood started shifting to limp-wristed faggots who have never done a real day of work in their life. bicycle lanes pushing out cars and working-class stores/restaurants are all positives to the laptop caste
 
But all muh studies with cherry picked data and non sequiturs told me this would be good for business! How could this happen?
 
Bike user are like dog owner, they entitled and shit up any space ( roads, trails, parks and other outdoor spaces) they occupy and make the qualty of life lower anywhere they go. They want to be treated like cars but fail to follow standard behavour of drivers. Moving over to let faster traffic, signal when turning or really basic etiquette.
 
They're lying shits and repeating a lie that egregious means the author is too.
I can easily patronize places on bikes that.... don't require me to carry anything bigger than a pack of gum out the door....

I used to ride my bike downtown as a kid to hit the movie theatre, or the arcade, or McD's, but NOT retail outlets.

Unless they were selling stuff that fit in a backpack, so that meant the book store was an option... but that was the practical limit.

I didn't take my bike to the grocery.

Or the clothing store.

Or the furniture store.

Or the lumberyard.....

How I'm supposed to carry 2x4s home on a bike is beyond me.....
 
Last edited:
It's all the bikers' fault and we need to ban them from life or run them over.

Now, to read the article...
 
I can easily patronize places on bikes that.... don't require me to carry anything bigger than a pack of gum out the door....

I used to ride my bike downtown as a kid to hit the movie theatre, or the arcade, or McD's, but NOT retail outlets.

I didn't take my bike to the grocery.

Or the lumberyard.....

How I'm supposed to carry 2x4s home on a bike is beyond me.....
Bingo. When the article is pointing out that people are not willing to lug the sort of goods they'll buy in these places because they're too heavy to carry to the cars and the response is "duh cyclists would totally get those goods on their bikes" it's a lie, you know its a lie and the person writing about it does too.

What the cyclists frequent are random food places. In their mind anything not catering to their needs at those precise moments they go past deserve to go out of business. My counter stance is the cyclist advocates deserve to be run over and unable to work anymore since that's the fate they want for the staff at these shops (minus the being run over).

Edit - I cycle less these days and need to get back into it. But my stance is the same now as then. We share the road and expecting our needs to be prioritised over other users is the height of arrogance.
 
but merchants complain the barriers are going in without their input and without plans to replace the parking spaces they eliminate.
Yeah that's the plan. These icky wh*te run small businesses don't have a place in the Superior 15 Minute Bugpod future, where everything that's not foot traffic distance at a GloboHomoMegaConglomo store is delivered
 
Despite Bumbaris’s misgivings, Osterman thinks the protected lanes will boost business on that stretch of Clark Street. “I’m a big believer that when you add bike infrastructure, it makes streets more pedestrian friendly, which will lead to more commerce,” he says. (One Clark Street business that has benefited: Gary’s Cycle Shop, a block from Bumbaris’s pizzeria. “It’s been a bit of an advantage for us,” says owner Richard Kerwer.)
God I fucking hate these pointyhead bureaucrat scum that absolutely refuse to look anything that isn't a study: literally only the bicycle shop benefited but don't worry, it will definitely boost business dontcha know. :smug:
Backing Osterman’s contention: a Portland State University study of several cities that found adding bike infrastructure “either had positive or nonsignificant impacts on corridor employment and sales.” New York City says that after it replaced parking spaces with bike lanes on a street in Queens, area business sales increased 12 percent.

That’s because cyclists travel slowly enough to notice businesses and can easily stop to patronize them, say bicycle advocates. If small businesses are feeling a dip, Amazon is the more likely culprit, says Jim Merrell, managing director of advocacy for the Active Transportation Alliance: “I don’t think anyone would say Milwaukee Avenue is a dead zone.”
Oh, Portland, a city that has trouble attracting ANYONE to it anymore, yes, absolutely, whatever they say.

And the gall to say "oh it's Amazon", not your shitty indestructible bollards? Go hang yourself with a rusty drive chain you dishonest cunt.
Since bollards and curb extensions were installed on Milwaukee, and the speed limit was reduced, collisions have decreased 56 percent, according to CDOT.
Oh so there's less accidents BECAUSE NOBODY IS MOVING? Brilliant, absolutely fucking brilliant. :story:
 
Back
Top Bottom