Business Big Tech Layoffs Megathread - Techbros... we got too cocky...

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Since my previous thread kinda-sorta turned into a soft megathread, and the tech layoffs will continue until morale improves, I think it's better to group them all together.

For those who want a QRD:


Just this week we've had these going on:

1706112535506.png

1706112610401.png

1706112702576.png

But it's not just Big Tech, the vidya industry is also cleaning house bigly:

1706112854585.png

All in all, rough seas ahead for the techbros.
 
Is there a reason that all of these places lay-off 10% of their workforce? Is it legal reasons, or is my autism super-power recognising patterns where there are none?
There are laws around layoffs depending on various cities, states, etc that certain obligations have to be met - for example you can't just roll in and say "Everyone's fired" if you're firing more than X employees. There are laws around severance, benefits, and notice.

Companies typically (for that reason) try and get them all done in one batch where possible - otherwise you have to restage all of the efforts to comply with the law each time you'd layoff a small group.
 
Their bundles aren't as good as they used to be, but every now and then there's something worth getting. As a publisher though? The only thing associated with them that I've heard of is Signalis.
They worked with Project Wingman too, if you haven't played it you should check it out. Batshit crazy, fun ace combat inspired game.

That being said, for every successful game they had, looks like they had a lotta flops. Numbers probably just weren't working out. They funded a good spread, but indie flops tend to be complete flops - you either make it, or miss by entire orders of magnitude. Of their ten most recent releases, it looks like only three made it past 50k or so copies sold, and quite a few of those are struggling to indicate even 10k sales. At indie price points, 50k copies is plausibly, if optimistically break-even. 10k is almost assuredly a failure, by the time you factor in the steam cut, the fact developers generally need to be fed and watered, and the admin costs alone to funding the project, its fucked.

As for the bundles going to shit? Low hanging fruits already been cleared. You're probably not interested in a bundle with 90% games you already got, and the games industry just isn't able to put out worthwhile games fast enough to keep a humble bundle always good, even if they weren't shitting up titles they way they are and struggling to compete against their own backlogs.
 
T-800 CPU, and definitely had some very high security clearances considering it was for the military. That dude probably had a hell of a network connection to the Cyberdyne servers, or at least as much as the Feds would allow. The dude did take his work home, and that meant he needed remote access to run simulations and calculations on the mainframe. Tech guys like that pretty much wrote their own checks back in the day before corporations really started cutting corners and strangling their golden geese.

As to the books, I've heard things were even worse for Nedry because Hammond wanted the system to do one thing but asked for it to do something completely differently, and was shocked when it didn't do what he wanted.
It was fake shock. Hammond knew. He took Nedry and his firm to court and threatened to sue him into oblivion and get him black listed if he didnt agree to additional scope.

One of the things about Hammond was that he was a con artist and he conned Nedry for free work. That helped push Nedry to work with the other companies because he got to fuck him back.

Its also how he was going to pay himself and his team (he sent the team home already by the movie because of the incoming storm) for the expense of doing all the last minute hacks
 
Last edited:
1722446468876.png 1722446511472.png 1722446580851.png 1722446625349.png 1722448484452.png 1722448415276.png
Bungie: "We are committing to two other major changes today that we believe will support our focus, leverage Sony’s strengths, and create new opportunities for Bungie talent.

First, we are deepening our integration with Sony Interactive Entertainment, working to integrate 155 of our roles, roughly 12%, into SIE over the next few quarters. SIE has worked tirelessly with us to identify roles for as many of our people as possible, enabling us together to save a great deal of talent that would otherwise have been affected by the reduction in force.

Second, we are working with PlayStation Studios leadership to spin out one of our incubation projects – an action game set in a brand-new science-fantasy universe – to form a new studio within PlayStation Studios to continue its promising development."
 
Last edited:
Can't say I blame them. However, all the jobs I got over the last 10+ years have been through LinkedIn.
LinkedIn is a soul sucking corporate hellhole, but for finding jobs it works if you're in the upper 50% of talent in your space, and will shut you the fuck down if you're in the lower 50%. It actually does what it sets out to do, helps recruiters and talent connect - But if your not talented, it doesn't give two flying fucks about you.

Just never, ever read the actual posting feeds. Its the worst HR fellating I have ever seen, and actually makes me feel the need to commit violence.
 
1722547369907.png 1722547449242.png 1722547491799.png
Team,

We have moved our All Company Meeting to today, following our earnings call, as we are announcing significant actions to reduce our costs. We plan to deliver $10 billion in cost savings in 2025, and this includes reducing our head count by roughly 15,000 roles, or 15% of our workforce. The majority of these actions will be completed by the end of this year.

This is painful news for me to share. I know it will be even more difficult for you to read. This is an incredibly hard day for Intel as we are making some of the most consequential changes in our company’s history. When we meet in a few hours, I’ll talk about why we’re doing this and what you can expect in the coming weeks. In advance of that, I wanted to preview some of what’s on my mind.

Simply put, we must align our cost structure with our new operating model and fundamentally change the way we operate. Our revenues have not grown as expected – and we’ve yet to fully benefit from powerful trends, like AI. Our costs are too high, our margins are too low. We need bolder actions to address both – particularly given our financial results and outlook for the second half of 2024, which is tougher than previously expected.

These decisions have challenged me to my core, and this is the hardest thing I’ve done in my career. My pledge to you is that we will prioritize a culture of honesty, transparency and respect in the weeks and months to come.

Next week, we’ll announce a companywide enhanced retirement offering for eligible employees and broadly offer an application program for voluntary departures. I believe that how we implement these changes is just as important as the changes themselves, and we will adhere to Intel values throughout this process.

Why Now?

Since introducing our new operating model, we have taken a clean-sheet view of the business and assessed ourselves against benchmarks for high-performing foundries, fabless product companies and corporate functions. This work made it clear our cost structure is not competitive.

For example, our annual revenue in 2020 was about $24 billion higher than it was last year, yet our current workforce is actually 10% larger now than it was then. There are a lot of reasons for this, but it’s not a sustainable path forward.

Beyond our costs, we need to change the way we operate – something many of you shared as part of our Employee Experience Survey. There’s too much complexity, so we need to both automate and simplify processes. It takes too long for decisions to be made, so we need to eliminate bureaucracy. And there’s too much inefficiency in the system, so we need to expedite workflows.

Key Priorities

The actions we are taking will make Intel a leaner, simpler and more agile company. Let me highlight our areas of focus:

Reducing Operational Costs: We will drive companywide operational and cost efficiencies, including the cost savings and head count reductions mentioned above.

Simplifying Our Portfolio: We will complete actions this month to simplify our businesses. Each business unit is conducting a portfolio review and identifying underperforming products. We are also integrating key software assets into our business units so we accelerate our shift to systems-based solutions. And we will narrow our incubation focus on fewer, more impactful projects.

Eliminating Complexity: We will reduce layers, eliminate overlapping areas of responsibility, stop non-essential work, and foster a culture of greater ownership and accountability. For example, we will consolidate Customer Success into the Sales, Marketing and Communications Group to streamline our go-to-market motions.

Reducing Capital and Other Costs: With the completion of our historic five-nodes-in-four-years roadmap clearly in sight, we will review all active projects and equipment so we begin to shift our focus toward capital efficiency and more normalized spending levels. This will reduce our 2024 capital expenditures by more than 20%, and we plan to reduce our non-variable cost of goods sold by roughly $1 billion in 2025.

Suspending Our Dividend: We will suspend our stock dividend beginning next quarter to prioritize investments in the business and drive more sustained profitability.

Maintaining Growth Investments: Our IDM2.0 strategy is unchanged. Having fought hard to reestablish our innovation engine, we will maintain the key investments in our process technology and core product leadership.

The Future

I have no illusions that the path in front of us will be easy. You shouldn’t either. This is a tough day for all of us and there will be more tough days ahead. But as difficult as all of this is, we are making the changes necessary to build on our progress and usher in a new era of growth.

When we began this journey, we set our sights high, knowing that Intel is a place where big ideas are born and the power of what’s possible triumphs over the status quo. After all, our mission is to create world-changing technologies that improve the lives of every person on the planet. And at our best, we have exemplified these ideals more than any company in the world.

To live up to this mission, we must continue to drive our IDM 2.0 strategy, which remains the same: re-establish process technology leadership; invest in at-scale, globally resilient supply chain by expanding manufacturing capacity in the U.S. and EU; become a world-class, leading-edge foundry for internal and external customers; rebuild product portfolio leadership; and deliver AI Everywhere.

Over the past few years, we have rebuilt a sustainable innovation engine that is largely in place and on track. It’s now time to focus on building the sustainable financial engine needed to drive our performance. We must improve our execution, adapt to new market realities and operate as a more agile company. That’s the spirit of the actions we are taking – knowing that the choices we make today, as difficult as they are, will strengthen our ability to serve our customers and grow our business for years to come.

As we take these next steps in our journey, let’s not forget that there has never been a greater need for what we do. The world will increasingly run on silicon – and the world needs a healthy and vibrant Intel. That’s why the work we are doing is so consequential. Not only are we remaking a great company, but we are also creating technology and manufacturing capabilities that will reshape the world for decades to come. And this is something we should never lose sight of as we push forward in pursuit of our goals.

We’ll talk more in a few hours. Please come with your questions so we can have an open and honest discussion about what comes next.


....
1722547243098.png 1722547278050.png
 
Last edited:
I wonder if they've ever considered the alternative option of "making CPUs that don't draw hundreds of watts, catch fire, destroy themselves over time, have major vulnerabilities and spyware, and could potentially compete with AMD's offerings" instead of just saying "fuck it, ship these self-rusting 12th and 13th generation CPUs and ignore/refuse RMA's, force speeds higher with more power consumption, oh and fire all these engineers."
 
Next week, we’ll announce a companywide enhanced retirement offering for eligible employees
This is the exact thing that caused Intel to fall behind AMD in the first place. They forced their talented long-term engineers into early retirement in order to promote diversity/India and then had to hire them back at significantly higher pay than before in order to try to catch up. Now that the executives bungled their product roadmap yet again, they're going to lay off the expensive (but highly skilled) people in order to save a bit of money next quarter.

TL;DR: Buy AMD.
 
I wonder if they've ever considered the alternative option of "making CPUs that don't draw hundreds of watts, catch fire, destroy themselves over time, have major vulnerabilities and spyware, and could potentially compete with AMD's offerings" instead of just saying "fuck it, ship these self-rusting 12th and 13th generation CPUs and ignore/refuse RMA's, force speeds higher with more power consumption, oh and fire all these engineers."
Yup. While the news of the root cause of the issues is still new enough and quiet enough that it probably didn't impact the stock prices much, the massive revenue miss is almost certainly because of it. The downstream partners using the hardware aren't retarded, we saw Gamers Nexus and Wendel dig up a LOT of evidence that shows they absolutely knew something was fucky with the intel stuff and were advising everyone to stop using it, and charging huge support premiums if they did anyway. They had no idea what was wrong, just that it was fucked and costing them money, and that's all it'd take.

TL;DR: Buy AMD.
AMD just had to last minute delay their new launches and recall all the samples due to unspecified issues. You don't do that if its just "oh here's a quick bios patch", you do that when you have an oh shit moment that would be far more expensive in PR to fix. Everything you said about Intel is 100% correct, but AMD is really not in that much better of a place. Both silicon giants are degrading before our very eyes, AMD is just declining from a higher peak in comparison.
 
Back
Top Bottom