😵‍💫 Obsessed Biden Derangement Syndrome - Blue man bad, KF, /pol/, Twitter and Reddit sperged over the 46th president

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Duke Nukem said:
But really, what the hell happened to the Left, they used to be anti-war and anti-corporate greed when I was younger. Now they've embraced drone strikes (as long as a Democrat is president) and CONSOOM PRODUKT bullshit.
Click to expand...
When you feel you're untouchable and will face no consequences for your actions because you have a finger in every avenue of society.
 
Duke Nukem said:
But really, what the hell happened to the Left, they used to be anti-war and anti-corporate greed when I was younger. Now they've embraced drone strikes (as long as a Democrat is president) and CONSOOM PRODUKT bullshit.
Click to expand...

The consume product shit is probably best summed up by something I heard someone say (can’t remember who)

”Republicans won the politics, but they want to win the culture war. Democrats won the culture war, but they want to win politics.”

The consume product shit is basically a safety blanket for the Dems, they surround themselves with pop culture plastic shit to make themselves feel better.
 
proteus4994 said:
The consume product shit is probably best summed up by something I heard someone say (can’t remember who)

”Republicans won the politics, but they want to win the culture war. Democrats won the culture war, but they want to win politics.”

The consume product shit is basically a safety blanket for the Dems, they surround themselves with pop culture plastic shit to make themselves feel better.
Click to expand...
If nothing else that might probably explain why Funko Pops are still around.
Marissa Moira said:
When you feel you're untouchable and will face no consequences for your actions because you have a finger in every avenue of society.
Click to expand...
Explains a lot, it's going to get worse from here on out.
 
Cross posted from the TES thread

EoAllCTUUAATUeA.jpeg
 
Honestly I don't know why they're so bothered by Biden considering how even at the best of times we're talking about a borderline 80 year old who looks 90.The only thing that I think is pretty much dead now is capital punishment.For over a decade slowly several states have abolished it while only a few practice it.Most have it only on paper.Kamala is known to be anti-capital punishment and with Biden not looking in the best of shape the federal death penalty might get suspended altogether ironically just after Trump had finally brought it back into operation after a 17 year hiatus.That's the thing I think is over and done with.Before 2030 the last execution will have taken place and that's it.I knew that when Obama got elected capital punishment would go into retreat slowly.While Obama never came out explicitly against it he raised issues of fairness which encouraged state activism to get it abolished.I think with Biden who is not exactly that alert and Harris as VP the death penalty is dead.A few states might hold out in stubborn opposition but the balance will tip decisively in the anti-death penalty crowd.Which honestly is kind of a big deal.Capital punishment has been a fact of life for almost the entire history of the US with an exception from 67 to 77. In fact I always suspected that the reason why Navy SEALs didn't bother to capture Bin Laden and why counterterror operations are primarily 'shoot and kill' is because someone realised the obvious. With the US justice system moving as it does at a snails pace and with capital punishment pretty much going away its easier from their POV to simply kill them.
 
Last edited:
iafiv said:
Honestly I don't know why they're so bothered by Biden considering how even at the best of times we're talking about a borderline 80 year old who looks 90.The only thing that I think is pretty much dead now is capital punishment.For over a decade slowly several states have abolished it while only a few practice it.Most have it only on paper.Kamala is known to be anti-capital punishment and with Biden not looking in the best of shape the federal death penalty might get suspended altogether ironically just after Trump had finally brought it back into operation after a 17 year hiatus.That's the thing I think is over and done with.Before 2030 the last execution will have taken place and that's it.I knew that when Obama got elected capital punishment would go into retreat slowly.While Obama never came out explicitly against it he raised issues of fairness which encouraged state activism to get it abolished.I think with Biden who is not exactly that alert and Harris as VP the death penalty is dead.A few states might hold out in stubborn opposition but the balance will tip decisively in the anti-death penalty crowd.Which honestly is kind of a big deal.Capital punishment has been a fact of life for almost the entire history of the US with an exception from 67 to 77. In fact I always suspected that the reason why Navy SEALs didn't bother to capture Bin Laden and why counterterror operations are primarily 'shoot and kill' is because someone realised the obvious. With the US justice system moving as it does at a snails pace and with capital punishment pretty much going away its easier from their POV to simply kill them.
Click to expand...
Shoot to kill became standard operating procedure against terrorists because of suicide vests. This is true even in France and the UK where capital punishment has been abolished for decades.

Capital punishment has been slowly declining for 20 years; the number of executions peaked at 98 in 1999. Even under Bush Jr executions declined because the American legal process for doing them is incredibly expensive and slow.
 
Pointless Pedant said:
Shoot to kill became standard operating procedure against terrorists because of suicide vests. This is true even in France and the UK where capital punishment has been abolished for decades.

Capital punishment has been slowly declining for 20 years; the number of executions peaked at 98 in 1999. Even under Bush Jr executions declined because the American legal process for doing them is incredibly expensive and slow.
Click to expand...
Yes but there was never an intention of taking Bin Laden alive and it is convenient he died because considering how the legal process moves his trial would have started at best in 2030.They would first have had to explain why Pakistan was not informed beforehand and that would have dragged the process for at least a decade while the courts decided what was and wasn't sensitive info.Don't forget Khalid Sheik Mohammed the actual mastermind of 9/11 was captured in 2003 and by 2011 his trial still had not started in fact its only set to start in 2021.Its not impossible someone realised the obvious in 2011 that a raid to capture Bin Laden would mean a trial before 2030 was impossible raising the awkward possibility that Bin Laden would die of old age on taxpayer expense.
Regarding capital punishment while it peaked in executions in 1999 it remained at a reasonably high level throughout the Bush 2 years albeit reduced.The anti-capital punishment movement only started to get moving right at the end of the Bush 2 years when New Jersey abolished it.Obama getting elected certainly got the ball rolling.Now capital punishment is on its way out. So a certain era in US legal history is about to end.That is kind of historic.Funny thing is the federal government is for the first time since WW2 the main executioner in the US.So its going away but not without one last gasp.
 
iafiv said:
Yes but there was never an intention of taking Bin Laden alive and it is convenient he died because considering how the legal process moves his trial would have started at best in 2030.They would first have had to explain why Pakistan was not informed beforehand and that would have dragged the process for at least a decade while the courts decided what was and wasn't sensitive info.Don't forget Khalid Sheik Mohammed the actual mastermind of 9/11 was captured in 2003 and by 2011 his trial still had not started in fact its only set to start in 2021.Its not impossible someone realised the obvious in 2011 that a raid to capture Bin Laden would mean a trial before 2030 was impossible raising the awkward possibility that Bin Laden would die of old age on taxpayer expense.
Regarding capital punishment while it peaked in executions in 1999 it remained at a reasonably high level throughout the Bush 2 years albeit reduced.The anti-capital punishment movement only started to get moving right at the end of the Bush 2 years when New Jersey abolished it.Obama getting elected certainly got the ball rolling.Now capital punishment is on its way out. So a certain era in US legal history is about to end.That is kind of historic.Funny thing is the federal government is for the first time since WW2 the main executioner in the US.So its going away but not without one last gasp.
Click to expand...
I don't think Obama had much to do with it really. 2008 had only 37 executions and the number was actually higher in 2009 and 2010 before it started to decrease a lot a few years later (especially after 2013). Most executions are done at local state level so who's in the white house isn't very important except for federal death row, and even with the federal executions this year there have only been 15 of them.
 
Pointless Pedant said:
I don't think Obama had much to do with it really. 2008 had only 37 executions and the number was actually higher in 2009 and 2010 before it started to decrease a lot a few years later. Most executions are done at local state level so who's in the white house isn't very important except for federal death row, and even with the federal executions this year there have only been 15 of them.
Click to expand...
Obama didn't do much directly but him raising the issue of fairness in executions certainly got the ball rolling at the state level.POTUS while not directly capable of telling state x to stop doing something if that something isn't against federal law certainly has a lot of influence on whatever activists exist in said state opposed to something.So if POTUS comes out against whatever that does encourage activism for that thing.Since Obama took an ambivalent maybe its good/maybe its not position on capital punishment that certainly influenced attitudes.And this process doesn't happen overnight it takes a couple of years to filter through.Don't forget how Obama came out strongly in the Zimmerman case and within 2 years movements like BLM which were just below the radar had gathered steam.That's not an accident. People sometimes underestimate just how influential POTUS can be for persons who share his views at the local level.And how much he can encourage activism.It does help when supporting a cause to be able to say 'the president agrees with us'.Its not as unimportant as it may seem.Having the president at least rethorically on your side when fighting for a cause is pretty big.At the end of the day the guy in the White House sets the tone of the nation.Everything that happens is either in reaction or opposition to him.Its awkward but its true.The truth is the president can involve himself in the affairs of a state even on matters on paper outside of federal control by simply coming out strongly against a certain practice.Because that will encourage whatever locals agree with him to be more open about it.Of course he can also fuck it up badly but presidents do have a certain influence that goes beyond anything that a governor can do.
 
Last edited:
proteus4994 said:
This is what kills me, the majority of the left hates SJWs as much as the Republicans do, yet the right insists we all want to implement some SJW infested hellworld.
Click to expand...
>Republicans
>Right wing

As far as why right-wingers are skeptical of lefties claiming to be as against SJWism as right-wingers are?
  • SJW types almost always support left-wing parties or at least prefer them over "right-wing" candidates
  • Leftwingers always rapidly get over their disdain for SJW ideology if it provides an ideal path to political advancement
  • Kiked news overwhelmingly supports left-wing parties, with the rare exception being Zionist outlets (Fox)
  • Leftwing backed social programs always turn into gibs me dat programs (in western countries)
  • Leftwing politicians are more vocal in their groveling to SJW shit
  • In the very rare case a politician grows a spine and tries to stand up to even the slightest bit of SJW bullshit, it's normally leftists who are the most vocal in using it to attack them (you even see this here)
  • SJW and or non-white shitholes always have entirely leftwing political leadership
  • "right-wing" political parties almost always cuck out to SJW shit in response to left-wing parties doing it first and then demanding they follow suit
  • Left-wingers (even here) are almost always more pro-censorship, and take a guess at what they want to be censored
  • leftwingers tend to be more atheistic
  • If leftwingers do find religion, it's some meme religion like Episcopalianism/Anglicanism

Both US parties are absolute garbage, but the Republicuck party mainly sucks of Zionists while the Demokike party mainly sucks off Diaspora. Guess which group has the most day to day influence on the average westerner?
 
mr.moon1488 said:
>Republicans
>Right wing

As far as why right-wingers are skeptical of lefties claiming to be as against SJWism as right-wingers are?
  • SJW types almost always support left-wing parties or at least prefer them over "right-wing" candidates
  • Leftwingers always rapidly get over their disdain for SJW ideology if it provides an ideal path to political advancement
  • Kiked news overwhelmingly supports left-wing parties, with the rare exception being Zionist outlets (Fox)
  • Leftwing backed social programs always turn into gibs me dat programs (in western countries)
  • Leftwing politicians are more vocal in their groveling to SJW shit
  • In the very rare case a politician grows a spine and tries to stand up to even the slightest bit of SJW bullshit, it's normally leftists who are the most vocal in using it to attack them (you even see this here)
  • SJW and or non-white shitholes always have entirely leftwing political leadership
  • "right-wing" political parties almost always cuck out to SJW shit in response to left-wing parties doing it first and then demanding they follow suit
  • Left-wingers (even here) are almost always more pro-censorship, and take a guess at what they want to be censored
  • leftwingers tend to be more atheistic
  • If leftwingers do find religion, it's some meme religion like Episcopalianism/Anglicanism

Both US parties are absolute garbage, but the Republicuck party mainly sucks of Zionists while the Demokike party mainly sucks off Diaspora. Guess which group has the most day to day influence on the average westerner?
Click to expand...
This argument would be stronger if you could stop screaming about the Jews for 1 paragraph. The Republicans are vocally Zionist and Trump got the most Jewish votes of any Republican since Bush Sr in 1988.

https://www.wnd.com/2020/11/poll-tr...republican-presidential-candidate-since-1988/
 
Pointless Pedant said:
This argument would be stronger if you could stop screaming about the Jews for 1 paragraph. The Republicans are vocally Zionist and Trump got the most Jewish votes of any Republican since Bush Sr in 1988.

https://www.wnd.com/2020/11/poll-tr...republican-presidential-candidate-since-1988/
Click to expand...
This argument would be a lot stronger if you had of read my entire post before instantly jumping to "DRUMPF!"
Both US parties are absolute garbage, but the Republicuck party mainly sucks of Zionists while the Demokike party mainly sucks off Diaspora. Guess which group has the most day to day influence on the average westerner?
Click to expand...
 
mr.moon1488 said:
This argument would be a lot stronger if you had of read my entire post before instantly jumping to "DRUMPF!"
Click to expand...
I'd argue Zionism does actually directly impact the taxpayer in that Israel receives billions of dollars of annual military aid, but that's nothing to do with BDS and I don't want this thread to stray even further off topic.
 
Pointless Pedant said:
I'd argue Zionism does actually directly impact the taxpayer in that Israel receives billions of dollars of annual military aid, but that's nothing to do with BDS and I don't want this thread to stray even further off topic.
Click to expand...
Lol and I agree with you but once again.
Guess which group has the most day to day influence on the average westerner?
Click to expand...
The Republicuck's support of Israel is a massive problem which leads to endless wars, but at the same time, that's on the other side of the world. Gibs me dats programs have an effect you can see by driving to your local KFC. Likewise, I'd argue that, that's an issue neither party in the US at least is ever going to actually do anything about other than make worse. Lol, hell the gibs me dats shit is getting to be about the same way, with Trump's whole idiotic "opportunity zone" project.
 
mr.moon1488 said:
Lol and I agree with you but once again.

The Republicuck's support of Israel is a massive problem which leads to endless wars, but at the same time, that's on the other side of the world. Gibs me dats programs have an effect you can see by driving to your local KFC. Likewise, I'd argue that, that's an issue neither party in the US at least is ever going to actually do anything about other than make worse. Lol, hell the gibs me dats shit is getting to be about the same way, with Trump's whole idiotic "opportunity zone" project.
Click to expand...
Those welfare programmes are the result of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society and were continued by Nixon and Ford. It wasn't some kind of Jewish conspiracy to start them. I agree that Democrats are much more keen on promoting welfare, though.
 
GayFlash said:
Decided to pop in this thread to let you all know I voted for Biden lol
Click to expand...

I look forward to regular updates on your gastrointestinal health, too.

Piga Dgrifm said:
Politicians are upper-class. The big corporations who fund them are upper-class. SJW IdPol shit is a distraction from the only privilege that actually matters which is being born into wealth, it is in the best interest of wealthy politicians to keep poor people shitting their pants over each other's melanin content instead, so they're gonna play into SJW stuff as much as they can. Celebrities and big businesses are doing the same thing.
Click to expand...

It's the same shit as happened when the Irish were treated like niggers, so they started living around and marrying blacks, and suddenly the WASPs realized there was a shit-ton of lower class puds, and it was necessary to drum up some shit to keep them angry at each other.
 
Pointless Pedant said:
Those welfare programmes are the result of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society and were continued by Nixon and Ford. It wasn't some kind of Jewish conspiracy to start them. I agree that Democrats are much more keen on promoting welfare, though.
Click to expand...
(((Nixon))) and (((Ford))) were secret, undercover Jews. Open your eyes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom