BetterHelp shared customer data while promising it was private, says FTC

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Online counseling company BetterHelp has agreed to pay $7.8 million to settle charges from the Federal Trade Commission that it improperly shared customers’ sensitive data with companies like Facebook and Snapchat, even after promising to keep it private. The proposed order, announced by the FTC on Thursday, would ban the same behavior in the future and require BetterHelp to make some changes to how it handles customer data.

According to the regulator, the sign-up process for the company’s service “promised consumers that it would not use or disclose their personal health data except for limited purposes.” However, the FTC alleges that the company instead “used and revealed consumers’ email addresses, IP addresses, and health questionnaire information to Facebook, Snapchat, Criteo, and Pinterest for advertising purposes.”

The FTC also says that the company gave customer service agents false scripts to try and reassure users that it wasn’t sharing personally identifiable or personal health information after a February 2020 report from Jezebel exposed some of its practices. The commission’s complaint accuses the company of misleading customers by putting a HIPAA seal on its website, despite the fact that “no government agency or other third party reviewed [BetterHelp]’s information practices for compliance with HIPAA, let alone determined that the practices met the requirements of HIPAA.”

“BetterHelp betrayed consumers’ most personal health information for profit,” said Samuel Levine, FTC bureau of consumer protection director, according to the agency’s press release. The commission says that “used consumers’ email addresses and the fact that they had previously been in therapy to instruct Facebook to identify similar consumers and target them with advertisements,” helping it bring in “tens of thousands of new paying users and millions of dollars in revenue.”

If the FTC’s order ends up going through, the $7.8 million would go to customers who signed up for the service between August 1st, 2017, and December 31st, 2020. Here are some of the other things BetterHelp would be required to do:
  • Stop sharing individually identifiable information about consumer’s mental health with any third parties
  • Stop misrepresenting its data collection and use policies
  • Alert customers who created accounts before January 1st, 2021, that their personal info may have been used for advertising
  • Obtain “affirmative express consent” from a customer before sharing information with a third party
  • Reach out to third parties that received customer information and ask that it be deleted
  • Establish a “comprehensive privacy program” and have an independent third party carry out privacy assessments
The requirements would largely be in place for the next 20 years. The FTC says that the agreement will go through a 30-day public comment period before it makes a final decision on whether to put it into effect. It’s worth noting, though, that the proposal passed the commission by a 4 to 0 vote, so it does seem to have a fair amount of support.

By agreeing to the order, BetterHelp isn’t admitting or denying many of the allegations brought against it by the FTC. In a statement posted to its website, the company calls its practices “industry-standard” but says: “we understand the FTC’s desire to set new precedents around consumer marketing, and we are happy to settle this matter with the agency.” It also clarifies that it’s never shared information like “members’ names or clinical data from therapy sessions” with “advertisers, publishers, social media platforms, or any other similar third parties.”

It’s far from the first time that concerns have been raised about BetterHelp or other online mental healthcare providers. Last year, lawmakers, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Ron Wyden (D-OR), sent a letter to BetterHelp asking for information on what data the service collected, how it was used, and how it interacted and disclosed its dealings with online advertisers and social media companies. Mozilla has also said that when it reviewed 32 mental health apps, it found that 28 of them shared people’s info with other companies.

While selling people’s mental health data isn’t necessarily illegal — even if they haven’t given consent, according to a report from The Washington Post — the FTC has been cracking down on companies that it determines are doing it improperly. Earlier this year, it fined GoodRx $1.5 million for sending health data to companies like Google and Facebook and barred the company from doing so again in the future.
Correction March 2nd, 5:57PM ET: A previous headline for this article said that BetterHelp sold the data, when the FTC has only accused it of sharing the data. The headline has been updated, and context about how the data was used has been added to the article. We regret the error.


Old thread on Betterhelp
 
Wow, I can't believe a company Youtubers shill alongside Nord VPN and Established Titles would be shady!
Direct to consumer marketing has always been a shitshow. This is just the next evolution selling Trump coins on FOX News or Billy Mays selling sticky fingers or whatever.

Selling a single product does not make for a very robust business model and selling direct to consumer means you can get away with all sorts of shit you'd never be able to do if you had to go through a traditional wholesaler who do basic DD before they place an order.

Basically, if it's being sold through a YouTube channel, you can bet it's either overpriced or a flat out scam.
 
Direct to consumer marketing has always been a shitshow. This is just the next evolution selling Trump coins on FOX News or Billy Mays selling sticky fingers or whatever.

Selling a single product does not make for a very robust business model and selling direct to consumer means you can get away with all sorts of shit you'd never be able to do if you had to go through a traditional wholesaler who do basic DD before they place an order.

Basically, if it's being sold through a YouTube channel, you can bet it's either overpriced or a flat out scam.
The first sticker being from @Product Placement is just :semperfidelis:
 
Lets bring back time outs. Company cant obey the rules? Company doesnt get to operate at all for a month or more. Monetary fines dont seems to help curb shady practices so I wonder if snuffing the money sources out temporarily would do it. I hate this awful ad centric world
 
Isn't Better Help ancient? I think I remember hearing about them shitting the bed like five years ago
Yeah, I recall there was a lot of controversy surrounding the company years back and I thought they went under. It's strange that it's suddenly come back and people are shilling for it like nothing ever happened.

People have the memory of goldfish, I swear...
 
Never buy a product shilled to you by Youtube sponsorships.
 
The commission says that “used consumers’ email addresses and the fact that they had previously been in therapy to instruct Facebook to identify similar consumers and target them with advertisements,” helping it bring in “tens of thousands of new paying users and millions of dollars in revenue.”

This is kind of a dumb complaint and a retarded failure on BetterHelp's part. Why is it bad that a new batch of dimwits were successfully "targeted"? They're going to be shown ads regardless, why not BetterHelp's? (Unless all advertising is immoral (it is).) If BetterHelp didn't target ads and instead bought out a larger part of Facebook's ad inventory, would it be ok? Then the issue is with BetterHelp's unfair competitive advantage against other therapists, not with damage to new victims.

And why, for the purposes of targeting, did they have to disclose the holders of the email addresses have been victims of therapy? Couldn't they have gone, "here are some emails that may or may not exist, find if they belong to existing users, find similar users, and show them this ad".
 
This shouldn't surprise anyone but the reality is it will to many of their users. The real issue here is that no amount of money is going to undo your data being given to 3rd parties who now "own" that data and can hand it off to other 3rd parties.

The FTC seems to be making a habit of forcing companies to notify users of what they're doing which I think is a step in the right direction, though the companies are going to do it in the most drab way possible so people skim the first line and consider the email read.

This is kind of a dumb complaint and a retarded failure on BetterHelp's part. Why is it bad that a new batch of dimwits were successfully "targeted"? They're going to be shown ads regardless, why not BetterHelp's? (Unless all advertising is immoral (it is).) If BetterHelp didn't target ads and instead bought out a larger part of Facebook's ad inventory, would it be ok? Then the issue is with BetterHelp's unfair competitive advantage against other therapists, not with damage to new victims.

And why, for the purposes of targeting, did they have to disclose the holders of the email addresses have been victims of therapy? Couldn't they have gone, "here are some emails that may or may not exist, find if they belong to existing users, find similar users, and show them this ad".
I assume the issue lies with BetterHelp being a snake and implying that it abided by HIPAA which comes with a high level of trust by people who perceive themselves as patients getting actual help. The customers are retards and BetterHelp is evil.
The emails also don't need to be associated with Facebook, there's nothing stopping Facebook from having a collection of known associated emails and building a social network off of them. This sort of "shadow profile" building is an industry of its own. This means someone who doesn't use Facebook can incidentally blow their own friends' cover if they were trying to hide their usage of BetterHelp with another email.

Yeah, ultimately people should have more common sense and read the fine print but companies lull people into a false sense of security and then abuse that trust.
 
Last edited:
Isn't Better Help ancient? I think I remember hearing about them shitting the bed like five years ago
Yeah, if memory serves right, back then the backlash was people coming out with horror stories that the "therapists" they were assigned were unprofessional, unlicensed (they might still be) and didn't give a shit about their clients.

You'd have to be pretty stupid to give your money to this scam after that, but unfortunately this was one cancellation that didn't stick, and the amount of people looking for a shrink certainly hasn't diminished in the last 5 years.
 
Wow, I can't believe a company Youtubers shill alongside Nord VPN and Established Titles would be shady!

You forgot Raid Shadow Legends.
Isn't Better Help ancient? I think I remember hearing about them shitting the bed like five years ago

I saw a TV ad for it last month. They are somehow still going. I don't know how. But they are. You'd think their name would be mud dozens of times over. Has anyone committed suicide yet due to piss poor counseling on there?

This shouldn't surprise anyone but the reality is it will to many of their users. The real issue here is that no amount of money is going to undo your data being given to 3rd parties who now "own" that data and can hand it off to other 3rd parties.

The FTC seems to be making a habit of forcing companies to notify users of what they're doing which I think is a step in the right direction, though the companies are going to do it in the most drab way possible so people skim the first line and consider the email read.

Just assume everyone wants to sell your data these days. Of course I won't be seeing ads since I never turn off that pesky ad block. But that doesn't mean I want my data sold. Not a lot you can do about it though. Since it's being done underhandedly and not just by Better Help.

As a rule of thumb don't touch any of these Youtube sponsor companies. It seems only the shadiest of companies wants to sponsor videos. That's why they'll reach out to any idiot yelling autistically about vidya for 15 minutes.
 
Never buy a product shilled to you by Youtube sponsorships.
Here here! I bought one of those ball shaving trimmers, because I hate using razors on my nuts, and the damn thing didn't shave any closer, still cut my sack, AND the separate charger never worked and it just stopped working completely after 5 months.

Hmph! Sheesh! You can't trust anyone these days to shill for a non-shady product.
 
Yeah, if memory serves right, back then the backlash was people coming out with horror stories that the "therapists" they were assigned were unprofessional, unlicensed (they might still be) and didn't give a shit about their clients.

You'd have to be pretty stupid to give your money to this scam after that, but unfortunately this was one cancellation that didn't stick, and the amount of people looking for a shrink certainly hasn't diminished in the last 5 years.
BetterHelp's whole rub was that you paid by the month, not by the session. So they'd intentionally overbook their therapists so it was almost impossible to get a therapist, and when you did they were overworked and burnt to a crisp. But you still paid for the month no matter if you were able to schedule with anyone or not. 100% a complete scam.
 
Wow you mean to tell me a shady shitty company that was embroiled in an actual controversy over being a scam, that came back, is now involved in a controversy over being a shady shitty company?

Someone fucking please launch the nukes already.
 
Back
Top Bottom