US BERKELEY BECOMES FIRST US CITY TO COMMIT TO VEGAN MEALS

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

BERKELEY BECOMES FIRST US CITY TO COMMIT TO VEGAN MEALS

The Berkeley City Council passes a resolution to phase out the amount of animal products the city purchases to move toward serving fully vegan meals.​

by ANNA STAROSTINETSKAYA

JULY 29, 2021

This week, the City Council of Berkeley passed a resolution to slash the amount of animal products the city purchases by 50 percent by 2024, with progress on the goal to be reported to the Council by the City Manager by January 31, 2022. Further, the resolution adopts a long-term goal of phasing out all purchases of animal products and replacing them with plant-based foods. The feasibility and timeline of the later goal will be reported by the City Manager to Council by June 30, 2022. The resolution will result in more plant-forward meals at city-supplied places such as summer camps, senior centers, and the Berkeley City Jail.
5CB4ED5B-1743-41D7-8D9D-72F85F21EC46.jpeg

“Berkeley has been a leader in addressing climate change, passing and implementing numerous measures that reduce our greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and improve the environmental quality of our community, region, and world. One critically important sector that accounts for about 25% of global GHG emissions and significant emissions here in Berkeley is our food,” the resolution states. “It is clear that the world cannot meet global GHG reduction targets without significantly curbing consumption of animal products. High-meat-eating nations like the United States, which consumes 2.6 times more meat than the global per capita average, must help shoulder this responsibility.”

The resolution was authored by Berkeley Mayor Jesse Arreguín and Councilmember Sophie Hahn, and was the result of advocacy by a coalition of animal-rights groups, including Direct Action Everywhere (DxE), Extinction Rebellion Oakland, The Animal Save Movement, East Bay Animal PAC, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and The Suitcase Clinic.

“This is a very important step for the city to take as part of our broader climate efforts, as well as building on our long tradition promoting the humane treatment of animals here in the city of Berkeley,” Mayor Arreguín said.
30692E84-B906-40DD-BDD2-FC1333162787.jpeg

Berkeley: a city with a history of vegan initiatives​

In 2018, Berkeley counted another first when it became the first city to adopt “Vegan Monday,” a step beyond the popular Meatless Monday initiative where residents are encouraged to remove all animal products from their plates every Monday. The “Green Monday” resolution—introduced by City Council members Kate Harrison, Cheryl Davila, and Hahn—is an effort to further address the city’s plan to combat climate change and to become carbon neutral by 2030. To set an example, the City Council itself now only serves vegan food at its meetings.

The city is also an early pioneer in implementing recycling programs, divesting from fossil fuels, and other environmentally friendly initiatives. When it comes to resolutions that benefit animals more directly, Berkeley has been taking action, as well. Prior to California becoming the first state to pass a ban on fur sales in 2019, Berkeley became the second city—following West Hollywood’s 2013 ban—to prohibit fur sales within city limits in 2017.
E72F275F-8C5A-4EF5-BB9C-8E3C40A27A3F.jpeg

The aim of getting this new resolution on the books in Berkeley is both for the purpose of establishing a route to fighting the climate crisis by divesting from animal agriculture and also to set a precedent for other cities to make similar changes. The animal-rights activists who fought to get this resolution passed in Berkeley are now expanding their efforts to encourage San Francisco (which already passed a partial resolution to divest from animal agriculture last year), Chicago, and other cities to make similar commitments.

“The public is rising up and taking action against the destructiveness of animal agriculture,” Almira Tanner, Berkeley resident and DxE Lead Organizer, said. “We’re hopeful this historic step can spur a wave of legislation to protect all life on Earth while we still have time.”
 
The aim of getting this new resolution on the books in Berkeley is both for the purpose of establishing a route to fighting the climate crisis by divesting from animal agriculture and also to set a precedent for other cities to make similar changes. The animal-rights activists who fought to get this resolution passed in Berkeley are now expanding their efforts to encourage San Francisco (which already passed a partial resolution to divest from animal agriculture last year), Chicago, and other cities to make similar commitments.

“The public is rising up and taking action against the destructiveness of animal agriculture,” Almira Tanner, Berkeley resident and DxE Lead Organizer, said. “We’re hopeful this historic step can spur a wave of legislation to protect all life on Earth while we still have time.”
I maintain my hypothesis that the anti-agriculture ethos is driven by a desire not to save the earth, but to punish the flyover states that rely on it for voting for Trump.
 
Love how there's no serious shit behind any of this besides "dude trust me"
 
Love how there's no serious shit behind any of this besides "dude trust me"
If vegans want to help the environment, they should stop consuming almonds in the amounts they do through almond butter and almond milk. Growing almonds in California is helping contribute to major water issues in the state.
 
If vegans want to help the environment, they should stop consuming almonds in the amounts they do through almond butter and almond milk. Growing almonds in California is helping contribute to major water issues in the state.
They don't know a god damn thing about anything in the supply chain to get them their "vegan" alternatives. Now processed it is, how much garbage is put into all that crap.
 
Here they are thinking they'll reduce meat production when really it will just means others can increase their meat consumption :)
 
They don't know a god damn thing about anything in the supply chain to get them their "vegan" alternatives. Now processed it is, how much garbage is put into all that crap.
That’s why I don’t trust vegans when they talk about agriculture. Most of them live in cities far removed from where the food is produced and they have this pie-in-the-sky idea that monocropping a bunch of soy and wheat, more than we already are, to make everyone go vegan will somehow “save” the environment, neglecting the amount of pesticides needed to get a decent crop, the erosion it can cause the soil if overdone to keep up with demand, and the many animals that get displaced and killed to make room for more farmland or during harvest. For as much crap as vegans give meat eaters, cows raised on grass is much better than endless fields of soy environmentally.
 
We ask Greta, the anointed child of holy climate, to deliver us from meat products and forgive us our exhaust pipes. Pray for us sinners now and at the hour of climate death. Awomyn.
 
Anyone else think it’s a good thing that jailbirds are gonna get 100% vegan food?
I mean, after a couple of years in the slammer they’re going to be weak as kittens, so thay won’t be outrunning cops any more. Add to that the horrifying prospect of going to a jail where all you get to eat is soy, rice and potatoes, and you’ll get joggers out there learning how to draft resumés and apply for jobs.
 
They don't know a god damn thing about anything in the supply chain to get them their "vegan" alternatives. Now processed it is, how much garbage is put into all that crap.

Just look at fake meat. You're better off eating real meat. The sodium in the vegan alternatives can be ridiculous.

If vegans want to help the environment, they should stop consuming almonds in the amounts they do through almond butter and almond milk. Growing almonds in California is helping contribute to major water issues in the state.

They don't care because muh milk alternatives. I drink oat milk. Not because I'm vegan or hate milk but because drinking dairy makes me ill. The prices are being driven up by California vegan hipsters.

Honestly, I'm surprised this isn't about "eat the bugs".
 
They don't care because muh milk alternatives. I drink oat milk. Not because I'm vegan or hate milk but because drinking dairy makes me ill. The prices are being driven up by California vegan hipsters.
That sucks. At least oats are less intensive to grow than almonds. I heard it’s dirt cheap to make your own oat milk because oats are cheap as hell, but companies that produce oat milk usually add flavorings and take out the chunky bits you can get if you don’t strain it enough when making it homemade. I heard that oat milk without at least a bit of vanilla flavoring doesn’t taste that good, but I’ve never had oat milk, so I can’t really say anything based on experience lol.
 
That’s why I don’t trust vegans when they talk about agriculture. Most of them live in cities far removed from where the food is produced and they have this pie-in-the-sky idea that monocropping a bunch of soy and wheat, more than we already are, to make everyone go vegan will somehow “save” the environment, neglecting the amount of pesticides needed to get a decent crop, the erosion it can cause the soil if overdone to keep up with demand, and the many animals that get displaced and killed to make room for more farmland or during harvest. For as much crap as vegans give meat eaters, cows raised on grass is much better than endless fields of soy environmentally.

From what I gather, they don't even understand how farming crops and raising animals complement each other. Plant by-products that would otherwise be thrown away get recycled as animal feed, turning it into calories for human consumption. Which is more efficient. It's also more efficient at land use, because land not suitable for crops can be suitable for animals and vice versa.

They know nothing, look at some basic statistics and don't understand at all what they mean.
 
Lol, they unironically included PETA in the groups who inspired this shit, but used the full name to try and make it stand out less.

I agree with @JambledUpWords re the almond shitshow, it's a failing of vegans everywhere to not realize how bad a lot of those vegan alternatives are in terms of the damage they do to the environment, but Californians have even less excuse than most. CA had had a decades long history of water wars even before the droughts began; there physically isn't enough water flowing in the state's rivers to supply the three competing groups that need it (agricultural use for crops, supplying the needs of humans in the cities, and actually maintaining flowing rivers that house fish and wildlife and keep the state from being a barren wasteland). Every year someone gets shafted, and since almond orchards take a prodigious amount of water those conflicts have only been ramping up in the last ten years or so.

Don't get me wrong, dairy farming isnt super water-efficient either, but some smug almond-milk-sipping undercut type is absolutely doing their part in screwing over all the wild fishies and forest animals that they claim to love so much. Maybe spend less time crying over rabbit fur trim on a coat and reflect on why a state that used to have salmon runs where fish literally got crowded out of the water now has to use a truck to move the fish upstream because the river's missing pieces. Ffs.
 
From what I gather, they don't even understand how farming crops and raising animals complement each other. Plant by-products that would otherwise be thrown away get recycled as animal feed, turning it into calories for human consumption. Which is more efficient. It's also more efficient at land use, because land not suitable for crops can be suitable for animals and vice versa.

They know nothing, look at some basic statistics and don't understand at all what they mean.
Also, plants love things like bone meal and manure, both from animals and are animal products, so even if a vegan thinks they aren’t using any animal products, the farmer growing their soy for their meat substitutes likely used a bit of manure and possibly some bone meal to create better soil. Plants love animals.
 
Anyone else think it’s a good thing that jailbirds are gonna get 100% vegan food?
I mean, after a couple of years in the slammer they’re going to be weak as kittens, so thay won’t be outrunning cops any more. Add to that the horrifying prospect of going to a jail where all you get to eat is soy, rice and potatoes, and you’ll get joggers out there learning how to draft resumés and apply for jobs.

If they ever did that, the prisoners could challenge it. As food provided to them must be adequate to maintain good health and nutrition. You could easily argue it is well established a vegan diet doesn't meet that requirement.

That'd be amusing to see.
 
That’s why I don’t trust vegans when they talk about agriculture. Most of them live in cities far removed from where the food is produced and they have this pie-in-the-sky idea that monocropping a bunch of soy and wheat, more than we already are, to make everyone go vegan will somehow “save” the environment, neglecting the amount of pesticides needed to get a decent crop, the erosion it can cause the soil if overdone to keep up with demand, and the many animals that get displaced and killed to make room for more farmland or during harvest. For as much crap as vegans give meat eaters, cows raised on grass is much better than endless fields of soy environmentally.

I remember, a few years back, reading a blog about life at Statesville DOC. It was written by an inmate via hard copy letters one of his friends on the outside used to get his story out. And one verrry interesting entry was all about the food. Statesville didn't serve meat. I don't think Maricopa County did either under Arpaio.
This inmate had a tinfoil hat theory that the soy meats were a ploy to destabilize, feminize, and possibly shorten prisoner lives due to (his thoughts) cancer risks becoming significantly higher and the inmates in general being sometimes more violent and unstable on certain days when certain soy products were served at chow.

Of course, living in the panopticon human zoo with no rec, no programs, and no Sirhan to buttfuck in the yard probably has a lot to do with it too.
 
If they ever did that, the prisoners could challenge it. As food provided to them must be adequate to maintain good health and nutrition. You could easily argue it is well established a vegan diet doesn't meet that requirement.

That'd be amusing to see.
Forcing a vegan diet on a prisoner might be argued as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’, but unfortunately Nutraloaf is a thing.
 
Back
Top Bottom