- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
This was another win for the law, Kiwis.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
According to /cow/ this sped has been released and is on the street again. Allegedly this is after his sentence was extended by a month last month for tarding out when a guard chastised him for failing to keep his cell tidy.
....How.
He apparently spent all his time copying piles of crazy bullshit and ended up owing the jail $800 for copy fees, so he probably had piles of paper and shit everywhere. I have no idea whether whatever source /cow/ has is accurate, but stuff in that thread has been pretty legit in the past.
No no, I absolutely believe he's the sort of person to shit on the floor, I was asking how in the Autism-frosted fuck he got released.
Note, he isn't using the tripcode he used to, so it might not be him, but it sounds like him.
Countdown to Benny Barber's next arrest begins... well, it began as soon as he was out, to tell you the truth.
Not sure he's doing anything illegal unless he had some kind of conditions of release. Really, the only illegal thing he did originally was the "revenge porn" shit, which is quite possibly an unconstitutional law. He decided it would be a better idea to sovcit it up, get sentenced, and then become a fugitive and get another jail sentence just for that, though.
"Revenge porn" seems to make something illegal based on someone changing their mind about whether they like someone at some point, so completely legal material suddenly becomes illegal maybe without you even knowing it.
I think what the good Darkmage was getting at is that Ben has a bad case of Eddie Haskell syndrome: A pathological inability to stay out of trouble. I agree on that point; Bennyboy fucking up again is not a matter of if, but when.
ORDER - The Court has reviewed de novo the Findings and Recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected, as well as Plaintiff's objections, the State Defendants' response, Vance's response, and the underlying briefing bef ore Magistrate Judge Acosta. The Court agrees with Judge Acosta's reasoning and ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation, as supplemented herein. The State Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF 294 ) is GRANTED. Claims barred by the Younger, and Heck doctrines are dismissed without prejudice to challenge the constitutionality of Oregon Revised Statutes § 163.472 or challenge the constitutionality or validity of Plaintiff's criminal conviction in state court. Plainti ff may not file a new case in this Court seeking money damages for his allegedly invalid criminal prosecution unless he obtains habeas corpus relief or has had his conviction reversed, expunged, or declared invalid. Plaintiff may not file a new case in this Court challenging the constitutionality of Oregon Revised Statutes § 163.472 until he has exhausted his state administrative remedies. The Clerk of the Court is directed not to accept any new complaint from Plaintiff raising such claims unless the complaint contains allegations that these prerequisites have been met. The remaining claims against the State Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. Vance's motion to dismiss (ECF 293 ) is GRANTED with prejudice with regard to Plai ntiff's claims under federal law but without prejudice with regard to Plaintiff's state-law claims to allow pursuit of such claims in state court. Vance's motion for sanctions under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 is GRANTED. Vance is awarded re asonable attorney's fees incurred after the Court awarded attorney's fees under Oregon Revised Statutes § 31.150. Vance's request for a pre-filing order is DENIED. Plaintiff may not file an amended complaint in this case. The Court will enter a judgment closing this case. All other pending motions are denied as moot. Signed 1/18/2019 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
Well, he's finally out.
"Upon a review of the record and the responses to the court's March 16, 2020 order, we conclude that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment. Barber has paid the filing fee, and his motions to proceed in forma pauperis are denied as moot"