💰 Grifter Ben Shapiro / The Daily Wire - Commentator, Lawyer, Writer, WAP Sommelier, Vanquisher of SJWs, Podcast Host, Mara Wilson's cousin

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
He really is the most stereotypical Jew out there
"Just work for free goyim"
"never retire"
And this rabbi claims he's on our side.
He is secretly suggesting though that they need the income tax money to keep supporting their BS. Best protest there is is to stop working. Based niggers figured that one out way before. Go on welfare, deal drugs on the side, go to jail - a free roof over your head! 🥳🤪
 
I unapologetically love Ben, but every once in a while he'll let slip some talking point that just shows at his core he's still a naive coastal elite that has no clue how the country actually works outside of LA.

He's trying to walk it back now by claiming ACKTCHUALLY he was just arguing for dismantling social security entirely, but that's not the point.



Like, this ain't it, champ.

View attachment 5810474
Ben's been pretty consistent on social security being dogshit.

This didn't strike me as wanting to keep people in the workforce for a reason that was coastal elitism. Not the way Kelly Osborne said there'd be no maids if Trump closed the border.

Won't say too much so I don't powerlevel but I work with electricians and those who do it as a side gig and they will do it until their backs give out and for many they'll be in their 80s before then
 
Screenshot_20240313_223226_Brave.jpg
(tweet, archive )
Guess he isn't for free speech when a platform can critique Israel.
 
View attachment 5813819
(tweet, archive )
Guess he isn't for free speech when a platform can critique Israel.
See, this is where free speech can get tricky.

On one hand, you wish for everyone to have a say in the context of your country's rights to free speech in the public square, in whatever format they see fit. BUT what if that format is owned by a foreign company, which is at the complete disposal of it's totalitarian government, who positions itself against your country's supposed values? Perhaps, it is even being used as a tool by that foreign power to dull your populace, along with feeding it propaganda antithetical to your goals. By sticking to your values and allowing this platform in your public space, you're possibly screwed, but if your take legislative action against this company, you stand to look hypocritical and disingenuous to the large userbase that uses the platform, many of them being young people you would hope to at least curry some favor with for present votes and future support.

Or, you can have the opinion that true free speech does not exist, and is instead merely arbitrated by the powers that be, in a continuous infowar that is supplemented, at least this time, with retarded dances, braindead teenage pity parties, and exceptional individuals like Daniel Larson and Tophiachu
 
See, this is where free speech can get tricky.

On one hand, you wish for everyone to have a say in the context of your country's rights to free speech in the public square, in whatever format they see fit. BUT what if that format is owned by a foreign company, which is at the complete disposal of it's totalitarian government, who positions itself against your country's supposed values? Perhaps, it is even being used as a tool by that foreign power to dull your populace, along with feeding it propaganda antithetical to your goals. By sticking to your values and allowing this platform in your public space, you're possibly screwed, but if your take legislative action against this company, you stand to look hypocritical and disingenuous to the large userbase that uses the platform, many of them being young people you would hope to at least curry some favor with for present votes and future support.

Or, you can have the opinion that true free speech does not exist, and is instead merely arbitrated by the powers that be, in a continuous infowar that is supplemented, at least this time, with retarded dances, braindead teenage pity parties, and exceptional individuals like Daniel Larson and Tophiachu
It's the free speech version of The Paradox of Tolerance.
 
He's basically retired, you think he does any "research" for his shows? He hires people to do it and he kvetches for an hour. So hard is the life of little ben.

Go do a real job for 45 years and say you should just keep working.

I'm almost impressed by his ability to openly just shit all over his own audience with these talking points against working people/Labor and have them continue to watch him.

It's like chickens simping for KFC.
 
00119.png
GIkIQPuWoAElCNq.jpg




Lil' Ben talks in circles about how he was totally right about his stupid take, shifting the goal posts to be about people needing to be fulfilled and you do that through work, and how there's no places to go to like bowling clubs or community activities anymore. He even gets in a gay dig at Tucker that goes back to their 5 year old interview where Tucker was against AI driving because it would decimate the trucking industry, as Ben tilts his yarmulke to smugly say these same people who are against AI are now for people to retire at 65, it is such a gay straw man of course Ben would think it sounds smart is spoken at 100mph.
 
Duel citizens should shut the fuck up when it comes to entitlements. Before you axe social security there's a lot more spending programs that needs to go. And number one on the list in my books is defense spending on Benny's precious Israel.
 
View attachment 5815529
View attachment 5815530

I3MHnZorex8F1iVc.mp4


Lil' Ben talks in circles about how he was totally right about his stupid take, shifting the goal posts to be about people needing to be fulfilled and you do that through work, and how there's no places to go to like bowling clubs or community activities anymore. He even gets in a gay dig at Tucker that goes back to their 5 year old interview where Tucker was against AI driving because it would decimate the trucking industry, as Ben tilts his yarmulke to smugly say these same people who are against AI are now for people to retire at 65, it is such a gay straw man of course Ben would think it sounds smart is spoken at 100mph.
1) I know about 10 people who retired 15+ years ago and they are still thriving with hobbies and social lives
2) If your wagie job is your only purpose for living, you deserve to be dead, like right now
 
To be fair, he's banning Chinese ownership, not the platform.

It's the same thing though.
There is no way that the Chinese government and Bytedance will give up ownership of Tiktok. They'll make sure that any potential buyer will have to pay grossly inflated prices and have to agree to certain conditions.
 
Ben doesn't seem to understand that this smugposting is making him look exponentially more foolish and showing even an ounce of humility would likely clear the air fairly quickly. All he would need is to say something along the lines of "Ok gang, I made some comments on retirement age in the context of social security that were taken in a way that I did not intend, and I think some clarification would be appropriate here as to the exact context of my remarks." Maybe even throw in a few measured criticisms of the initial backlash and effectively paint himself as the victim of soundbite politics.
But no, he just has to lash out at people for not appreciating what a galaxybrain he is.
 
Back
Top Bottom