Battle for Section 230 - The Situation Monitoring Thread for Monitoring the Situation of the Situation Monitor's Situation Monitoring

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Pissmaster said:
Come to think of it, they really do see the internet like cable TV packages, don't they?
Click to expand...
>Someone/Somegroups want to turn the internet like cable TV Packages.
Now where have i heard that before?
DQ7fUDuUMAEFbNW.jpg
what-is-net-neutrality-isp-package-diagram.jpg
 
Null said:
The fat faggot retard has found enough time between shaking hands and swapping spit with every senior GOP official to tweet this out again.

View attachment 1645001
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1313511340124917760

There's yet another Section 230 amendment that was proposed in the House as a bipartisan effort between Tulsi Gabbard (D, HI-02) and Paul Gossar (R, AZ-04) called the Don't Touch Me Act. It offers similar changes to Section 230.

https://gabbard.house.gov/news/pres...r-introduce-bill-prevent-unwanted-anti-social
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/8515/all-info

Supposedly this one is meant to only remove Section 230 protections for services which use user data without their consent to offer content, but which will realistically only result in more GDPR-essque notifications that help fucking nothing.

If you don't know what Section 230 is or how it helped foster the Internet since before the towers fell, now's a good time to learn.


If you're wondering why there's suddenly 5 or 6 amendments in various stages of the congress and proposed by the FBI about Section 230, it's because of tweets like this. Everyone was treated the same, and the CDA was basically untouchable. Now it's very political, very partisan, and definitely will be changed. Everyone wants to get their own carve-outs and definitions in while the iron is hot.
Click to expand...

I've changed my mind. I don't want him to survive his Bat soup infection slowly and painfully any more, i want him to fucking croak from it.
 
SSF2T Old User said:
>Someone/Somegroups want to turn the internet like cable TV Packages.
Now where have i heard that before?
View attachment 1645451View attachment 1645453
Click to expand...
Pay MORE money to bypass an artificial paywall just to access websites you were able to BEFORE because of "muh bandwidth."

Yet electing a boomer businessman is good for this country.

GTFO; y'all are just as bad as electing neoliberals or neoconservatives these past 25 years.
 
The Un-Clit said:
I've changed my mind. I don't want him to survive his Bat soup infection slowly and painfully any more, i want him to fucking croak from it.
Click to expand...
As retarded as he is on this, Biden thinks the same thing, probably not as a strong arm tactic, and a Biden administration would be able to pass it.
 
Chiri said:
Let's not forget that this all started because Twitter put a fucking naughty sticker on one of his Tweets. Twitter is shit but his reaction to the disclaimer that can easily be ignored was completely overblown and now we're stuck with the consequences forever.
Click to expand...
GRANTED, Trump's reaction is retarded and he really should be going after the individual companies that are doing stupid shit, but let's not pretend Twitter is innocent in all of this either. Tech companies have had their inflated egos grow larger with each passing year, and people have been sucking it up and just dealing with it for quite some time, mostly because they don't have the kind of power to fuck with them back. It's one thing to tweet "go fuck yourself" to the president, because its just words and you're expressing your right to free speech. It's another thing entirely when you are taking away the power for the President to post something because your guidelines are so fucking ass-backwards that it's so fucking obvious the site has a political bias.

All these companies SHOULD have a mandatory tard-wrangler to keep their asses in line from time to time.
 
Null said:
As retarded as he is on this, Biden thinks the same thing, probably not as a strong arm tactic, and a Biden administration would be able to pass it.
Click to expand...
Well, it was nice knowing you Internet.

Maybe if we're lucky, Biden will go full dementia and forget this even exists.

I despise both of them with a passion.
 
Null said:
The fat faggot retard has found enough time between shaking hands and swapping spit with every senior GOP official to tweet this out again.

View attachment 1645001
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1313511340124917760

There's yet another Section 230 amendment that was proposed in the House as a bipartisan effort between Tulsi Gabbard (D, HI-02) and Paul Gossar (R, AZ-04) called the Don't Touch Me Act. It offers similar changes to Section 230.

https://gabbard.house.gov/news/pres...r-introduce-bill-prevent-unwanted-anti-social
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/8515/all-info

Supposedly this one is meant to only remove Section 230 protections for services which use user data without their consent to offer content, but which will realistically only result in more GDPR-essque notifications that help fucking nothing.

If you don't know what Section 230 is or how it helped foster the Internet since before the towers fell, now's a good time to learn.


If you're wondering why there's suddenly 5 or 6 amendments in various stages of the congress and proposed by the FBI about Section 230, it's because of tweets like this. Everyone was treated the same, and the CDA was basically untouchable. Now it's very political, very partisan, and definitely will be changed. Everyone wants to get their own carve-outs and definitions in while the iron is hot.
Click to expand...
Fuck it let's just shut down the internet altogether it's done nothing good for us.
 
Null said:
As retarded as he is on this, Biden thinks the same thing, probably not as a strong arm tactic, and a Biden administration would be able to pass it.
Click to expand...
Ideally, TDS would come into play and the liberals would rush to defend 230 out of spite for Trump, but that isn't happening.

Best case is "we need the ability to censor conspiracy theories like QAnon!"
 
Null said:
The fat faggot retard has found enough time between shaking hands and swapping spit with every senior GOP official to tweet this out again.

View attachment 1645001
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1313511340124917760

There's yet another Section 230 amendment that was proposed in the House as a bipartisan effort between Tulsi Gabbard (D, HI-02) and Paul Gossar (R, AZ-04) called the Don't Touch Me Act. It offers similar changes to Section 230.

https://gabbard.house.gov/news/pres...r-introduce-bill-prevent-unwanted-anti-social
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/8515/all-info

Supposedly this one is meant to only remove Section 230 protections for services which use user data without their consent to offer content, but which will realistically only result in more GDPR-essque notifications that help fucking nothing.

If you don't know what Section 230 is or how it helped foster the Internet since before the towers fell, now's a good time to learn.


If you're wondering why there's suddenly 5 or 6 amendments in various stages of the congress and proposed by the FBI about Section 230, it's because of tweets like this. Everyone was treated the same, and the CDA was basically untouchable. Now it's very political, very partisan, and definitely will be changed. Everyone wants to get their own carve-outs and definitions in while the iron is hot.
Click to expand...
Maybe my mom was right and Trump does have dementia. Which is awful because I have been mocking a senile old man during his last good years.
 
Null said:
As retarded as he is on this, Biden thinks the same thing, probably not as a strong arm tactic, and a Biden administration would be able to pass it.
Click to expand...

Both parties want to do this, the only reason they haven't already is they want to do it for different reasons. The only thing stopping it currently is they are too stupid and busy swordfighting with their dicks to actually do anything at all, much less this.
 
I don't see anything happening until after the election. Trump has bat AIDS, the Republicans are trying to get the Catholic lady confirmed, and the Democrats are busy harvesting ballots. What happens AFTER the election, I don't know, because things keep getting crazier, and I don't know if anyone is going to be looking at it while both parties are screaming and possibly rioting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom