😵‍💫 Skitzocow Augustus Sol Invictus / Austin Gillespie - Crazy Lawyer and Failed Politician, Kicked Out of Libertarian Party

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I would not vote for this man.

I would follow him to the very gates of Valhalla.
 
mN6W21I.jpg

The black dude killed 2 people and he's still not the scariest person in the photo.
 
mN6W21I.jpg

The black dude killed 2 people and he's still not the scariest person in the photo.

His hair looks like someone took a 3d rendering and used the smooth tool on it, thus fucking up it's polygons. How do you get hair to look that weird.
 
Listening to this dude is like traveling back in time. Why would he talk like that? Its political suicide.
 
Politicians aren't exactly normal people, but libertarian politicians tend to be nuttier than most, and not just for their politics.
 
From the article I found a post he made on LinkedIn. It is INCREDIBLE

A Call for Total Insurrection said:
I do not want you to vote, so much as I want you to wake up. I want you to drop out and tune in. I want you to take LSD and practice sorcery. I want you to listen to trap music and black metal, to learn the law and to break it deliberately, to find your own religion. I want you to learn the use of firearms and subject yourselves to rigorous physical training. I want you to treat your bodies as Holy Temples and to take your girlfriend to a strip club so you can seduce a dancer in the back room. I want you to worship Nature and dance naked in the moonlight ‘round the fire, screaming in ecstatic joy. I want you to revolt. Raise Hell. Break your limitations. Renounce your life and go into the Wilderness, that God may speak to you of things to come.
 
I don't understand whether he is a thelemite or a neopagan. Does he think that they are the same or was he pretending to be a neopagan but actually a thelemite (and if the latter then why not just pretend to be evangelical christian)
 
I don't understand whether he is a thelemite or a neopagan. Does he think that they are the same or was he pretending to be a neopagan but actually a thelemite (and if the latter then why not just pretend to be evangelical christian)
Over the past few months, I've found conflicting sources. From what I can gather, he is a thelemite who was attempting to obscure the fact or make it more understandable by referring to himself as a pagan in the broadest terms.
 
His party is flat-out telling him to fuck off now.
The Libertarian Party of Pinellas County (LPPC) calls Augustus Invictus, US Candidate for Senate, to immediately disassociate from the Libertarian Party of Florida (LPF). Seeing as the Executive Committee of the LPF failed to suspend the membership of the candidate despite a clear violation of the Non-Aggression Principle, and our affiliate was deliberately not included from participating in the vote, we have no alternative but to demand that Mr. Invictus voluntarily leave the party and change his voter registration out of the LPF.

According to Char-Lez Braden, chair of the LPF “Legally, the LPF has no control over a candidate’s political affiliation. Florida election laws allow anyone, with any ideology, to run as a candidate in the party they declared when registering to vote. The LPF has not endorsed Augustus Invictus and has not provided him with any support. Under the law, we cannot prevent him from running as a Libertarian and he is not required to enter our certification process.”

A candidate who clearly calls for war, insurrection, and eugenics of the weak, disabled, and those of low intelligence does not represent the ideology of the hard working Libertarians who have dedicated their time, efforts, and reputations toward the good principles of party.

“It is truly unfortunate that the progress in the party has been severely tarnished by a lunatic posing as a Libertarian,” states Stephanie Davenport, At-large Representative of the LPPC. “The hardworking, principled members of the Pinellas affiliate are evaluating our association with the state party,” she says. “We need to act in the best interest of our members and restore the reputation of proud Libertarians residing in Pinellas county. It is egregious that we were denied the opportunity to vote on such an important matter at the state level. If Mr. Invictus truly has the best interest of the Libertarian Party at heart, he will stop the hemorrhaging he has caused and leave the party.”

The chairman of the Libertarian Party of Pinellas County issued a statement last month unequivocally disavowing its association with hate organizations. The full context of that memo appears below.

As chair of the Executive Committee (EC) of the Libertarian Party of Pinellas County (LPPC), I hereby publicly rebuke all forms of aggression based ideologies. At the core of our very essence, Libertarians oppose the initiation of force to achieve political or social goals. The Libertarian Party of Pinellas County has zero tolerance for association with hate based groups or persons. Any expression of support for organizations or individuals advocating unprovoked violent actions shall constitute a transgression of the NAP (non-aggression principal), the interpretation of which shall be determined by the LPPC EC. Precisely because we champion peace, we will not stand by quietly if our ideals are compromised by hate or aggression.

Let me be quite clear, we condemn violence and bigotry based on, among other things, race, ethnicity, sex, education, financial status, creed, age, national origin, or sexual orientation as morally repugnant and shall ostracize any person or organization advocating such.

In liberty, Joe Jacobs
Chair, Libertarian Party of Pinellas County
Source
 
joined just to keep up with this thread -- best info I've found re: this guy. What a kook.

Did y'all see some of the comments in the original Above the Law blog post? ofc they are from 2 years ago.

Those of us who know Augustus are taking this very seriously. Having spent three tension-filled years with him in law school, I can say this is not a joke. He's written long articles advocating for eugenics, he essentially denied the holocaust during a 1L class discussion, his self-published book on Amazon is alarming, he once operated a blog where he called for all churches to be burned the ground and argued that people who censor speech ought to be "shot dead ina dark alley with no dignity."

Source
 
Back
Top Bottom