🪦 Deceased Audrey E. Hale / Aiden E. Hale - Troon Terrorist

[Manimal House]

^no doubt in my mind an attempt was made to draw this one.

 

[Kari Kamiya]

Jynx, motherfuckers, she wanted to fuck a Jynx.

 

[Ashkenazi Porn Actress]

She was white, so, Arcanine?

Houndoom.

 

[Tasty Tatty]

Doesn't matter, she's been fucked by Cerberus now.

 

[Got Milk!]

Really? Pretty sure she fantasized about having a Diglett and 2 Voltorbs so that's obviously the answer. Something like this (just maybe with a bigger Diglett):

 

[Bababooey Warlock]

Doesn't matter, she's been fucked by Cerberus now.

Yeah, and thankfully she isn't grooming little hellhound puppies.

 

[macrodegenerate]

I've been interested in active shooters my entire life since middle school. It's always fascinated and horrified me that someone would do something like this. I've studied the lives and actions of these people from the Colombine kids to Adam Lanza, and Elliot Rodger.
I don't care about spree shooters on a whim. The planners are the only interesting ones.
For all of them it's always the same. They define their entire self worth and persona on one thing they can never have. The one thing can vary from person to person. For Elliot it was a girlfriend, for the colombine kids it was to stand out, and for Lanza it was growing up and being independent from the chaotic systems which shaped him.
It doesn't matter what these people are given, loving parents, a bright future, wealth and connections beyond the average person's wildest dreams. As long as the one thing they chase isn't satisfied to them their lives are worthless. That thing is always out of reach for them, and inevitably their desire for it is perverted into the desire to destroy what they cannot have.

Elliot wanted to destroy women because he wanted to prevent any other person from being loved by them. The Colombine kids wanted to kill other kids to ensure that nobody would ever look up to those other kids. Lanza killed children where they were safe, so that they could never experience an independent life with meaning.

Lastly,Hale lived in the past. Always wondering if things would have been better if they had the choice to become male. She envied more than anything the ability to choose, and defined herself by how powerless she was to achieve her transition. Then she picked up a gun and took that choice away from the children who might have been able to make it.

 

[Aero the Alcoholic Bat]

Lastly,Hale lived in the past. Always wondering if things would have been better if they had the choice to become male. She envied more than anything the ability to choose, and defined herself by how powerless she was to achieve her transition. Then she picked up a gun and took that choice away from the children who might have been able to make it.

The choice is still not available, even now. At best, such kids have the "choice" to become underdeveloped eunuchs.

I wouldn't be surprised to see even more tranny shooters in the decades to come, even as late as 2040 or 2050.

 

[macrodegenerate]

The choice is still not available, even now. At best, such kids have the "choice" to become underdeveloped eunuchs.

I wouldn't be surprised to see even more tranny shooters in the decades to come, even as late as 2040 or 2050.

Hale had that misperception that hormones are magic, and that guys fuck stuffed animals. Just because she was a retard doesn't change the pattern

It's usually 20-40 years for the chickens to come back to roost for negligent pharmacultical/medical schemes. Lobotomies were 40, The opioid crisis was 20. This whole thing started around the late 2010s. Your timeline is right, as I believe I've mentioned earlier in this thread. My only hope is it's the surgeons and doctors who prescribed the medications and performed the surgeries instead of children.

 

[pikachudidnothingwrong]

Every single woman I have ever met who was excited about ass play in any capacity has been porn sick. Most women I know tried it once or twice to appease a partner and then never again. I can’t imagine any pleasure being involved in one women sticking a foreign object up another woman’s butt. This pooner had her brain scrambled by porn and yaoi.

Don't forget the gay angle that tries to push it as "totally normal" straight sex in order to make degenerates feel better.

The judge's argument is basically the the drunken driving license revocation argument: "No need for due process or a trial because it's an administrative, not a civil or criminal case".
This is basically the 2A mental gymnastics loop equivalent to stating that "Shall not be infringed" doesn't apply to individuals because it says "The right of the people", therefore you can't own firearms, only the people (the state) can, or that anything short of a 5 star resort stay is "cruel and unusual" punishment.
@Useful_Mistake Are we good with a thread for this case or is it not sufficiently insane enough to be in the L&L LLP sub-forum?

Not just that but the entire argument that "the people" constitutionally means "states" itself does some pretty.. interesting things to amendments like the 1st. And make the 10th read down right nonsensical.

If that's a legit report, that means she was off her medication. Antidepressant withdrawals can cause aggression. Benzo withdrawals can also cause aggression. All it takes is one day for benzo withdrawals to start. You can get away with missing a day or two when it comes to SSRIs.

This.. Going cold off of a anti-d, even when not on it for depression, takes the saying "feel like a million bucks" and turns it on its head. You feel like you owe someone a mil or two.

All pooners have a completely warped view of masculinity because they're fed stupid feminist theory until they think men are violent brutes raping or killing everything they touch. None of these women realize the biggest turn on to a man is a woman wanting to have sex and enjoying it. They associate making their partner orgasm with successful sex, not choking them out and shoving a fist up them.

Yup.. This!

But haven't you heard? Men wanting, hoping or trying to get their female partner a good time/off, is toxic, sexist, objectification and dangerous now too. According to some "expert" article in one of the teen pop mags a few years ago. Supposedly it's really just an attempt for men to feel good about themselves or something and thus, as per the rules of modern feminism, totally invalidates it as anything "healthy" or good for woman. (i.e. "Men like it so it HAS TO be seen as bad") Assuming it's even true for any men to begin with.

We need to bring back the asylums. I could go into a whole tirade about the Second Amendment and how we should be restricting who buys a gun rather than what kind of gun is available to everyone, but a grown adult that is certifiably autistic, plays pronoun games, has rape fantasies that she probably told her shrink about, and never mentally progressed past the age of 12 should not be allowed to walk freely among us as a voting United States citizen, let alone be allowed to drive and buy a gun.

Padded rooms, checkers, locked pianos, pills in Dixie cups, all around.

Seriously. When people start talking about restricting what people should be allowed to do/have in a free and open society, based on the severe dangers there may be to themselves and others. Two questions need to be asked. Why they view society as one giant safe space or day care? And why these people should be allowed, at least untreated, in public by themselves to begin with?

Basically, if someone is so ill that they need to have certain rights restricted without criminal trial, then what business do they have being out and about in general?
Though i do understand that this is a potentially dangerous line of argument. Especially in a society where the professions and education is so completely captured by partisan and ideological extremists. A lot of people already believe wanting to own a gun or speak freely,, vote the wrong way etc etc.. are some kind of mental disorder. Remember that communists and leftist governments have a history of using the mental health system as a means of ideological and political persecution.

"You believe one should own the fruits of their labor? Literal insanity"

There is also the issues of potential for institutional to personal abuse. The history of mental hospitals is not bright.. so much so that the reality is ripe and popular for horror story settings. While some of it was a product of the era and views on people and mental health.. the poor science etc. In a way, we are still dealing with the fallout and rightful pushback from that history. It's the reason why we have none at all now. Sadly a little to extreme and absolutist.. but understandable none the less. There is an inherent danger like no other when you start talking about locking someone up in absence of criminal elements. It would require a HUGE multi faceted oversight system of many levels and types. Systems of continual medical and legal review etc etc. Absolute right to free access to patients by anyone. Right to open and unrestricted communication with and to the outside. Just for a start.

I agree with you, but in current day, there are SO MANY of those people around. Maybe not all will go as far as shooting kids, but you see dozens of girls just like Audrey here on social media (tumblr, twitter, etc), with the same twisted fantasies, the same Peter Pan syndrome, and the same autistic behaviors. Even if we lock up the most dangerous, the not dangerous are still running around in society being part of it and influencing it.

We can't just lock up all of these people, because new people will become this eventually, and we're back to zero in the next generation. We need also to examinate what's the problem and deal with it so our children grow up normal instead of waiting which one's insane to act about it after they shoot children. All the pronoun crazies are definitely not well, as they all believe in the delusion, we can't realistically put them all in a cell, as tempting as that sounds.

I actually think this issue makes a serious argument for banning children and teens from social media at the VERY LEAST... They have no perspective and thus no defense against the mass of information and things they see, combined with the social trend affect and pressure. Beyond even that, there is the basic aspect of danger that comes along with socialization in general. (just look at cases where girls, in small groups, schools or even towns, "catch" completely mental based ticks and "illnesses". extreme social contagions etc.)

Same with smart phones. Which i feel responsible for many other mental, social, functional and developmental dangers.

Has this been posted yet?.....

https://tennesseestar.com/covenant-school-shooting/mnpd-review-of-vanderbilt-university-medical-center-records-covenant-killer-audrey-hale-had-thoughts-of-killing-dad-struggles-with-mental-health-recent-thoughts-of-going-into-a-school-and-s/

https://archive.is/1rjpA

Yet another case of a shooter spelling out what they want to do. We really need to decide on a uniform set of responses for how we deal with these sorts of things officially as a society. So there is no second guessing etc. If it turns out to not be an actual good indication of anything then fine, we act accordingly, but if it is... and we continually treat it as 'case by case', putting people and officials on the hook for deciding what to do... with all the fear of getting it wrong, ruing lives, getting sued etc.. it would be criminal.

 

[BigGuyOS 6 : Jovial Janny]

I actually think this issue makes a serious argument for banning children and teens from social media at the VERY LEAST... They have no perspective and thus no defense against the mass of information and things they see, combined with the social trend affect and pressure. Beyond even that, there is the basic aspect of danger that comes along with socialization in general. (just look at cases where girls, in small groups, schools or even towns, "catch" completely mental based ticks and "illnesses". extreme social contagions etc.)

Same with smart phones. Which i feel responsible for many other mental, social, functional and developmental dangers.

This is the fundamental problem of our time: how can we restrict social media usage among children and teens while not granting the government large-scale surveillance powers? I can think of a few things I haven't heard elsewhere, but none of them are perfect.

1. Require an ID purchase a smartphone similar to tobacco and alcohol.
Restricts children from purchasing them, but probably ineffective. Kids don't buy smartphones to begin with—parrents do. Many stores require ID to purchase M rated games, but that doesn't stop kids from acquiring and playing them- the parents will just act as an intermediary.

2. The phone requires that you enter your birthday. It creates a hash, which you send to a family member, friend, the DMV, etc. They type in your birthday within 1 minute and if the hashes match, your birthday is verified. If you are under 16, your birthday is encrypted and stored locally in a tpm and updated once per year until age 16, after which it is deleted. If you are under age 12, only built in calling, texting, and camera apps are permitted alongside a store limited to FDA approved Apps. If you are 12-16, you may use any age appropriate app, so long as they do not require the creation or sign in of an account, and has strict advertising guidelines. There will probably be exceptions for banking apps and email, but not for social media. Ages 16+ are full unrestricted access.

 

[3deadniggers]

Yup.. This!

But haven't you heard? Men wanting, hoping or trying to get their female partner a good time/off, is toxic, sexist, objectification and dangerous now too. According to some "expert" article in one of the teen pop mags a few years ago. Supposedly it's really just an attempt for men to feel good about themselves or something and thus, as per the rules of modern feminism, totally invalidates it as anything "healthy" or good for woman. (i.e. "Men like it so it HAS TO be seen as bad") Assuming it's even true for any men to begin with.

Men see sex different to women. We associate successful sex with an orgasm as that's where we feel our best. So we do want to make our partners orgasm. The conflict comes with women enjoying orgasms but successful sex to them is the bond sex brings. So they can have sex and not orgasm and be more satisfied than if they did. The magazine takes this miscommunication and implies negative association with men not understanding what women need to get the most out of sex.

Not going to quote it but there are plenty of women who do enjoy anal. The vagina and anus are right next to each other and depending on the position and shape of the penis it can rub the sensitive areas inside the vagina too. There are porn sick people who do it for that reason, but there's also women who hate porn and enjoy it. The first part of this post is also one of the reasons. It can feel kinky and give a thrill to be offering it to your partner you're closely bonded with. Female sexuality is more complex than just rubbing the good spots and anal can play a part in that for some women. The connection with the partner can elevate the act.

 

[BigGuyOS 6 : Jovial Janny]

Men see sex different to women. We associate successful sex with an orgasm as that's where we feel our best. So we do want to make our partners orgasm. The conflict comes with women enjoying orgasms but successful sex to them is the bond sex brings. So they can have sex and not orgasm and be more satisfied than if they did. The magazine takes this miscommunication and implies negative association with men not understanding what women need to get the most out of sex.

Not going to quote it but there are plenty of women who do enjoy anal. The vagina and anus are right next to each other and depending on the position and shape of the penis it can rub the sensitive areas inside the vagina too. There are porn sick people who do it for that reason, but there's also women who hate porn and enjoy it. The first part of this post is also one of the reasons. It can feel kinky and give a thrill to be offering it to your partner you're closely bonded with. Female sexuality is more complex than just rubbing the good spots and anal can play a part in that for some women. The connection with the partner can elevate the act.

Behold, a woman who enjoys Anal!

 

[macrodegenerate]

Basically, if someone is so ill that they need to have certain rights restricted without criminal trial, then what business do they have being out and about in general?
Though i do understand that this is a potentially dangerous line of argument. Especially in a society where the professions and education is so completely captured by partisan and ideological extremists. A lot of people already believe wanting to own a gun or speak freely,, vote the wrong way etc etc.. are some kind of mental disorder. Remember that communists and leftist governments have a history of using the mental health system as a means of ideological and political persecution.

My outlook on the judicial system is the same as mental healthcare. If a person is incapable or unwilling to change to become a productive member of society, what's the point in keeping them locked up? You already have their life in your hands and have essentially dehumanized them, why pull the wings off a fly? Reach for the swatter and act humanely.

 

[Tragon Dirtle]

My outlook on the judicial system is the same as mental healthcare. If a person is incapable or unwilling to change to become a productive member of society, what's the point in keeping them locked up? You already have their life in your hands and have essentially dehumanized them, why pull the wings off a fly? Reach for the swatter and act humanely.

because having to kill someone is distressing for any normal person, even if it's for the right reasons. Getting enough people to kill the amount of non-functional people, that weren't themselves sociopaths, would be hard, and what if they're then mentally or emotionally affected by the experience that they can't function?

Also Audrey and other pooners don't get the idea that men are violent rapists from feminist theory, both feminists and pooners are reacting to how common VAWG is, and how it's celebrated and fetishised through the porn industry. Audrey's problem was early porn exposure.

Also most people want to think that change or redemption is always possible, even if it isn't, but it definitely isn't if they're dead.

 

[Ghostse]

We need to bring back the asylums. I could go into a whole tirade about the Second Amendment and how we should be restricting who buys a gun rather than what kind of gun is available to everyone, but a grown adult that is certifiably autistic, plays pronoun games, has rape fantasies that she probably told her shrink about, and never mentally progressed past the age of 12 should not be allowed to walk freely among us as a voting United States citizen, let alone be allowed to drive and buy a gun.

Padded rooms, checkers, locked pianos, pills in Dixie cups, all around.

Asylums were terrible and the system was dismantled for cause.
that said, yeah we need to bring them back for like maybe a decade or two until something better can be done.

 

[Dr. Eldon Tyrell]

I only skimmed highlights so it’s probably already been said… but her writing reads as if it was written by a literal tard. Add in the drawings and it is shocking that this individual is above age 10.

I also noticed that a lot with zoomer troons, no matter if mtf or ftm. I already made a spergy effort post on that but again: it seems to be these puberty blockers which make them retarded. That euporia troon fashion model, hunter schafer, also scribbled and posted like a special needs child and then her mangement DELETED FUCKING EVERYTHING.
Check out the pattern below - that's supposed to be a normal functioning 15-17 year old's writing - just no.

 

[Tasty Tatty]

I've watched enough movies to know people who write charts like this end up actually committing crimes.

 

[(The REAL) Jack Torrance]

I also noticed that a lot with zoomer troons, no matter if mtf or ftm. I already made a spergy effort post on that but again: it seems to be these puberty blockers which make them retarded. That euporia troon fashion model, hunter schafer, also scribbled and posted like a special needs child and then her mangement DELETED FUCKING EVERYTHING.
Check out the pattern below - that's supposed to be a normal functioning 15-17 year old's writing - just no.

too lazy to link but I've come across at least one publication that does correlate puberty blockers to lowered IQ, so I definitely agree there. Makes sense considering hormones are highly relevant to brain development. AFAIK Audrey was not on puberty blockers, who knows what made her such a tard. That Hunter Schafer note is DERANGED. Was that something recent or from awhile ago? I know tons of people accept Hunter as a relatively normal troon, so this surprises me to see.

 

[invisibult plus+]

too lazy to link but I've come across at least one publication that does correlate puberty blockers to lowered IQ, so I definitely agree there. Makes sense considering hormones are highly relevant to brain development. AFAIK Audrey was not on puberty blockers, who knows what made her such a tard. That Hunter Schafer note is DERANGED. Was that something recent or from awhile ago? I know tons of people accept Hunter as a relatively normal troon, so this surprises me to see.

ThEy'Re JuSt LiKe Us!