Ask a genuine anarcho-capitalist anything* - *ideally where a libertarian framework is relevant

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Ancap Virgin said:
I know I'm a bit late on this, but in our ideal world, there wouldn't be any welfare programs that incentive the mass migrations we're seeing rn
Click to expand...
Welfare is one factor that distorts incentives. My broader point was that migration in a free society does not operate at the level of "countries" at all.
As in, welfare is an answer to the question of why people move, but the point I made was that the more important question is who decides entry. Under statist conditions, a centralized policy is imposed on millions of unwilling property owners. Under a free system, every owner sets their own terms, be that individually or in association.
So even if large numbers of people want to move, there is no legitimate mechanism by which they can be collectively imposed on others, for a free society has no "border policy" to capture and no mechanism to override a population. The state's structure of control is the reason why migration is a political problem in the first place.
 
My feeling is anarchism fits better with socialism than capitalism, because capitalism tends so easily toward hierarchy as a feature and inevitable outcome of its mechanism. But, it is one of those horseshoe theory situations where the two actually end up overlapping a lot more than anyone who hasn't actually read up on it would ever expect.

What do you think of the works of fellas like Graeber? I find a lot of the dude's arguments hard to disagree with. His actual books are very long dense reads so most people have only seen a YouTube synopsis, but his understanding of economics, which starts from an anthropological root instead of abstract economic presuppositions, gets a lot right.

Also a good chuckle reading this thread how many of the devout chud conservatives on this site are actually just straight literal deadass liberals who don't realise it tbh.
 
Should retards (Everyone who can't pass a Paper Bag Test) be allowed to vote or have any political power?
 
Nick Wilde said:
My feeling is anarchism fits better with socialism than capitalism
Click to expand...

We’ve already seen what AnCom’s do in the Spanish Civil War or Antifa hives like Portland. Lots of extrajudicial murders, struggle sessions and kangaroo courts.

AnCapaitalism is inherently unwilling to defend itself and just creates The Camp of The Saints.
 
I don't know why you let people mock you so hard in the first 3 pages when you could have simply told them you can use guns to defend yourself from somali invaders.
This would never have happened if you were a nazi instead.
Well anyway, here is my question: would there be politics in ancap cities? Or would it all be about laws only? Can politics exist without the appropriation of other people's money?
Also, what about geopolitical intervention? I'm not versed in politics, but from what I gather the USA must intervene in places like Venezuela and the Middle East because otherwise China and other foes will get oil from them. How do they even avoid a situation like that? You either get involved or a start a foreign conflict, losing money and lives in the process, or your enemies get stronger.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom