Are virtual e-thots more entertaining than normal e-thots

[KingCoelacanth]

Is it true that traditional ethots just sit in front of a camera and do nothing while vtubers (try) to put on a show and engage with the audience?
I don't really watch either and wouldn't know, but I've seen claims that traditional ethots get upset that vtubers steal viewers by being more (realtively) entertaining

 

[The Last Stand]

Entertaining? No.

 

[COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST]

It's often the case. What you call "e-thots" are stereotyped as wearing a low-cut blouses and behaving vapidly for a good reason. The "vtubers" at least have the courtesy to play a character and are more likely to engage with their audience. You're still pathetic if you watch either, however.

 

[Akashic Retard]

I don’t understand what is entertaining about either

 

[Wingnut]

A VTuber has to rely on having any kind of personality aside from "I have big titties in a small shirt", so yes the bigger ones are generally more entertaining than your average twitch whore.

 

[BingBong]

I don't like either lol. A vapid whore who doesn't show her face is still a vapid whore.

 

[Prophetic Spirit]

Neither.
Both are profitable business and i don't like giving a view of those.

It's often the case. What you call "e-thots" are stereotyped as wearing a low-cut blouses and behaving vapidly for a good reason. The "vtubers" at least have the courtesy to play a character and are more likely to engage with their audience. You're still pathetic if you watch either, however.

Well, i dislike low-end LARPING & hot tub streams but you're right about the last.

 

[CreamBunny]

A VTuber has to rely on having any kind of personality aside from "I have big titties in a small shirt", so yes the bigger ones are generally more entertaining than your average twitch whore.

VTubers still rely on "I have big titties in a small shirt" it's just that their titties aren't real and neither is their personality.

 

[MODUS]

It's often the case. What you call "e-thots" are stereotyped as wearing a low-cut blouses and behaving vapidly for a good reason. The "vtubers" at least have the courtesy to play a character and are more likely to engage with their audience. You're still pathetic if you watch either, however.

At the same time it's easier for a revolting transexual to hide behind a vtuber character. I'm surprised that hasn't become an epidemic already.

 

[Revo]

It's the same crap but with different faces and different ways of entertaining and earning money from horny people.

 

[Medulseur]

Neither of them are more entertaining. You could look up pinups/cheesecake for free and get a much better experience if you just want some eye candy to stare at.

 

[WeWuzFinns]

The virtual ones are more entertaining if you are a pedophile. True chads watch bitches who know how to spoil themselves.

Null and Chanty are finally together

 

[Lone MacReady]

It's often the case. What you call "e-thots" are stereotyped as wearing a low-cut blouses and behaving vapidly for a good reason. The "vtubers" at least have the courtesy to play a character and are more likely to engage with their audience. You're still pathetic if you watch either, however.

Agreed, though my counter to the V-tuber shit is that it's even less real than the e-thots. At least a whore has to put in some effort to make her face look like a baboon's ass, and if she doesn't you can tell. The V-tuber craze is some creepy, even more disconnected from reality shit cause that cat femboy maid you think you're watching could be a 70-year old eskimo.