Science Are transsexuals mentally ill?

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Are transsexuals mentally ill?

By Cecil Adams | Aug 17, 2012, 2:00am EST

Dear Cecil: In a recent Straight Dope Message Board thread about transsexuality, one commenter offered the following: “People who have gender identity disorders … are just dudes dressing up as chicks and/or dudes who have gotten a doctor to mutilate them to have imitation female genitalia (or [the other way around for women], I guess.) … GID patients have a mental illness and society should be looking into ways to eradicate that mental illness through some form of treatment that isn’t the equivalent of giving a paranoid schizophrenic who thinks he’s Napoleon a bicorn hat and a saber.” Care to comment? Startled Lurker

1671839185510.png
Illustration by Slug Signorino

Cecil replies:

I’m not inviting that guy to the next meeting of my LGBT support group. However, from a certain perspective, he’s got a point.

Standard medical opinion is that transsexuals are mentally ill. The revised fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders offers a long description of gender identity disorder that boils down to this: you think you’re the wrong sex, and you’re not happy about it. The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems calls it transsexualism and defines it this way: “A desire to live and be accepted as a member of the opposite sex, usually accompanied by a sense of discomfort with, or inappropriateness of, one’s anatomic sex, and a wish to make his or her body as congruent as possible with the preferred sex through surgery and hormone treatment.”

Fact is, most transsexuals agree there’s something wrong with them. The difference is they think it’s with their bodies, while unsympathetic outsiders say it’s with their heads.

The professional view of transsexuality is evolving. DSM-V, currently under development, proposes replacing gender identity disorder with “gender dysphoria.” From what I can see this is mostly an exercise in euphemism: you still think you’re the wrong sex, and you’re still not happy about it. But others think the whole notion of transsexuality as a disorder should be abandoned. For example, in 2009 the French health ministry declared it would no longer classify transsexualism as a psychiatric condition.

Not to get all peace-and-love about it, but the core issue really is unhappiness. DSM-III dropped the old classification of homosexuality as a disorder because of the dawning realization that whatever gays and lesbians might be unhappy about, it wasn’t about being gay or lesbian as such — the main issue was social disapproval. In contrast, even with all the social acceptance in the world, transsexuals are still going to think they’re the wrong sex.

Why they do so is unknown. Some researchers think a percentage of transsexuals have an underlying physiological condition, essentially a wrong-gendered brain. Regardless, few in the field believe transsexual impulses can be eradicated or cured. The choices are some combination of hormones and surgery, or else you just deal.

The surgery part is what makes some people recoil. They cite another condition proposed for the DSM, body integrity identity disorder, characterized by the wish to have a part of your body amputated, typically the left arm or leg. You don’t see anybody claiming BIIDers are paragons of mental health and doctors should merrily saw away. But another way to look at it is that sex reassignment surgery or hormone treatment is more like a full-body tattoo. Would I do it? No, but I don’t much care if other people do.

The question is whether reassignment makes transsexuals happy. Most studies say yes, but that conclusion was questioned by the UK newspaper the Guardian in 2004. Having interviewed several SRS patients who said they were no happier after surgery and felt they’d made a big mistake, the paper commissioned the Aggressive Research Investigative Facility (ARIF) at the University of Birmingham to review the medical reports. ARIF’s conclusion: most studies of SRS outcomes were fatally flawed, the major failing being that a huge percentage of SRS patients dropped out of sight.

For example, one study found that of 727 subjects who had undergone male-to-female SRS, 539 had a known address, 420 of those had a correct known address, 417 of those were still alive, 355 of those agreed to participate, and 232 of those returned their forms. Of the last group, 86 percent rated their “happiness with result” at 8 or higher on a 10-point scale, and only four percent said 5 or below.

You can spin this any way you want. The responders are a pretty satisfied group, but what’s up with the nonresponders?

Some are surely dead. A large-scale 2011 study from the Netherlands found treated transsexuals had much higher than normal death rates due to suicide, drug abuse, AIDS, and so on. Then again, other studies have concluded that while post-ops have high suicide rates, pre-ops’ are even higher.

The subject deserves more investigation. If I were desperate enough to consider sex reassignment surgery seriously, I’d still want to be damn sure it would help.

Cecil Adams
 
Definitely. Anyone who looks like Krang that can look in a mirror and have an inner monologue about how gorgeous they are is mentally touched.
 
Usually Betteridge is right on but in this case:
Yes they are mentally ill. They were defined as mentally ill until very recently when the DSM was changed to appease the lunatics and I am sure pharmaceutical companies who stand to make piles.
The subject deserves more investigation. If I were desperate enough to consider sex reassignment surgery seriously, I’d still want to be damn sure it would help.
Unfortunately that investigation will only happen after tens of thousands of mutilated children sue.
 
duh , I can't believe they wasted the time to make this article.
 
most transsexuals agree there’s something wrong with them. The difference is they think it’s with their bodies
And this is exactly why normal people think trannies are mentally ill.
 
DSM-V, currently under development,
Wait, what?
>2012
Oh, I see. Thought they were making another revised copy.
If you really want to see people's headgears get jammed, start asking them questions related to Body Dysmorphic Disorder. You know, that mental illness where people are completely and utterly convinced that something is wrong with their bodies (say, that their nose is hideously deformed), while everyone they ask sees nothing wrong with it. Sufferers go and ruin their lives by spending thousands upon thousands of dollars for cosmetic surgery, but because it's an issue caused by their internal perception of themselves, it never actually fixes the problem permanently, and they inevitably find either a new issue ("Fixing my nose ruined my proportions, I gotta get my jaw sanded down!") or continue to believe that the original issue is unresolved. The worst cases spiral into such self-loating that people will isolate themselves from the outside world, kill themselves, or go into the garage, grab a claw hammer, and try "fixing" their face on their own. And unlike something like an obvious psychotic who's threatening people, you can't get any kind of legal intervention on them just because they're blowing 50 grand on surgeries, only when it's too late and they start taking drastic steps.

So, what's the cure for this disorder, according to contemporary psychological orthodoxy?
Cognitive therapy and medication. Not surgery. Not "re-affirming" the delusions that the afflicted have. You have to work with them to convince them that, no, everyone is telling the truth when they say nothing is wrong with you, and it's all in your head.

Why, then, is gender dysphoria treated differently? If you ask some people, they claim it's because the prognosis is better if with re-affirming surgery. But, as this article points out, suicide rates are pretty fucking high for these people, and hormones and surgery isn't exactly a miracle cure. But because the orthodoxy, passed down from on high (the word of the APA), you can't go and do studies examining this, questioning this, because no one is going to fund your "transphobic" research. Same thing with the idea of the transgender having a "wrong-sexed" brain. Is it the truth? Well, considering we know just about jack shit with the brain, good luck finding it out, especially considering the political climate.

And that's really the crux of the issue: the APA is an organization that purports to act in the best interest of psychologists and patients using cutting-edge research, but its decisions are all made in private, backroom arrangements and motivated by both political capital and monetary incentive (don't forget to buy the new, updated DSM-5! You don't want to be using out-of-date diagnostic criteria, do you?) I can only imagine how many suicides and how much grief could have been prevented if they had not gone for the Stonewall crowd and claimed that having your genitals mutilated was the single, best course of action for someone who, statistically, is a miserable, neurotic mess. The blood is on their hands.
 
Even if you want to be incredibly generous and say most trannies aren't horrible people, and that they actually experience dysphoria instead of it being a weird fetish, they're still mentally ill as their mental state is rejecting their body.
 
Yes. It used to be classified as a mental illness until, for political reasons and with absolutely NO evidence, it was removed from the DSM IV.

What do you call someone that rejects reality? A dreamer, crazy? Never normal!
 
Back
Top Bottom