UK Are there more autistic people now?

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

1746314933112.webp

Venessa Swaby and Ellie Middleton were both diagnosed with autism as adults

You might have seen the social media videos: the "five signs you're autistic". You may have heard about long waiting lists for autism diagnosis. You might know, or sense, that the numbers of people deemed autistic are going up, fast.

There's a lot at stake. These numbers mean fiercely different things to different people. To some, autism is a fear (what if this happens to my child?); to others it's an identity, maybe even a superpower.

So what's the truth about the number of autistic people - and what does it mean?

To count something, you first need to say what it is you're counting.

For someone to be diagnosed with autism, they need to have "persistent difficulties in social life and in social communication," says Ginny Russell, an associate professor in psychiatry at University College London (UCL) and the author of The Rise of Autism. She's using the criteria for autism from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, known as the DSM.

She says examples of this behaviour can range from a lack of turn-taking in conversation to being completely non-verbal.

Restricted interests and repetitive behaviours are part of a second group of traits required to meet the criteria, she says. So things like "hand flapping or rocking or skin picking, but also sticking to repeated routines, like eating the same food every day."

The data​

But what evidence is there that the number of people meeting those criteria has risen?

Ms Russell led a study that looked at changes in rates of autism diagnosis in the UK over 20 years. It drew on a big sample of data from about nine million patients who were registered at GP surgeries.
1746314910272.webp

They found eight times as many new autism diagnoses in 2018 as in 1998. "It was an enormous increase," she says, "best described as exponential."

And it's not just happening in the UK. Though data is lacking in much of the world, Ms Russell says that "in the Anglophone and European countries where we do have data, there is compelling evidence to suggest that other countries have seen a similar sort of rise in diagnosis as in the UK".

But - and this is a crucial point - a rise in the number of people diagnosed with autism is not the same thing as a rise in the number of people who are autistic.

Ms Russell's study and others like it show there has been a huge rise in the number of people diagnosed with autism, so in that sense there is more autism around than there used to be. But could that rise in diagnosis be explained by changes to who we count as autistic rather than an increase in the number of autistic people?

Why are diagnoses rising?​

The definition of autism has not been static. The first studies to describe autism appeared in the 1930s and 1940s, says Francesca Happé, a professor of cognitive neuroscience at King's College London, who's been researching autism since 1988.

"The original descriptions of autism are of children who have pretty high support needs, typically are very late to talk," she says. "Some don't talk at all. And the focus really was on children, of course, and largely on males."

But the definition was broadened, Professor Happé says, when in the 1990s Asperger's syndrome was added to diagnostic manuals. People with Asperger's were seen as on the autistic spectrum because of social difficulties and repetitive behaviour, but had fluent language and good intelligence, she says.

The eightfold increase in new diagnoses that Ginny Russell found included Asperger's syndrome, which was seen as a particular type of autism.

Another subset of autism added to the manuals was a "safety net diagnosis" called "pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified" (PDD-NOS) and that increased the numbers too.

Today, diagnostic manuals refer simply to autism spectrum disorder, or ASD, which includes people previously diagnosed with Asperger's or PDD-NOS.

The autism net has been cast wider.

Autism in women and girls​

1746314857182.webp

Sarah Hendrickx, who is herself autistic, has been diagnosing autism for more than 15 years

One group of people now falling under this net more often is women and girls.

Studies looking at the huge rise in autism diagnoses show that the rise has been considerably faster for females than for males.

It's something Sarah Hendrickx has seen in her job as part of a team that diagnoses autism.

"I've been doing this maybe 15, 20 years or so," she says. "In the early days, they were virtually all males that were coming forward for diagnosis. And now they're nearly all females who I see."

Ms Hendrickx was herself diagnosed with autism as an adult and is also the author of a book called Women and Girls on the Autism Spectrum.

She says the big growth in the number of people diagnosed with autism is because we're "playing catch-up for decades and decades of people like myself".

Because autism was originally seen as something that affected mainly boys, she says autistic girls would instead be diagnosed with mental health conditions like social anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), and borderline personality disorder (BPD).

Now we have a better understanding of how autism can present in girls and women, thanks to an increase in research and books like Ms Hendrickx's, which was first published in 2014.

She says that one important gender difference is that girls may be better at masking, which means hiding their autistic traits so that they fit in socially, perhaps by copying others' behaviour.

More adults diagnosed​

The rise in diagnosis has also been much faster among adults than children. Ms Hendrickx says this shows another way the autism net has been cast wider: it now includes more people with lower support needs.

"We are talking, I think, more about individuals with no intellectual disability," she says. "I think people with delays in their development, in their speech, are much more likely to have been diagnosed much, much earlier because the signs were much clearer at a very young age."

There's data to back this up. One study shows that between 2000 and 2018, new autism diagnoses of those with intellectual disability rose about 20%, while autism diagnoses in those without intellectual disability rose 700%. Autism's centre of gravity has shifted.

For Ellie Middleton, an autistic and ADHD content creator and author, that's a good thing.

1746314788100.webp

Ellie Middleton, who is autistic and has ADHD, believes more autism diagnoses are a positive thing

She says she became very mentally unwell before being diagnosed with autism. "I was on the maximum dose of antidepressants that any fully grown adult could be on at the age of 17," she says. "I couldn't be left alone, I couldn't go out."

Her autism diagnosis three years ago helped her to change the way she lives her life and to keep her mental health in a better place.

But others worry that the version of autism people now see in the media and in their social media feeds is distorting public perceptions.

A focus on celebrities can "glamorise" autism, says Venessa Swaby, who is also autistic and runs support groups for autistic children and their parents through her organisation A2ndvoice. Meanwhile, she says, families with non-speaking autistic children feel they are "written off".

As the number of people diagnosed with autism has risen, so then has the diversity of autistic people, which, in turn, has brought tensions over who owns the word - and what it means.
1746314750975.webp

Venessa Swaby runs support groups for autistic children

Environmental causes​

There's also been a looping effect: as more people are diagnosed with autism, more people become aware of it and that fuels the rise in numbers further.

The internet and social media have played a big part in that - as well as speculation about the reasons behind the rapid rise in diagnoses.

Disproven theories linking the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination to autism linger. Others say there must be something in what we eat, drink, or breathe that's causing more autism.

But, as we've seen, the data suggest the rise in diagnoses can be explained by a broadening autism definition rather than an increase in the amount of underlying autism. And there's solid research showing that autism is largely a product of the genes you inherit from your parents.

Is there any evidence that environmental causes could be playing some part in the rise, even if a small one?

Ginny Russell looked at research into different potential environmental factors and found only a few that were plausible to explain some of the rise.

"There is definitely a quite well established link between autism and the age of the parent," she says. "If the parent is older you're more likely to have an autistic child, but it's not a huge effect."

She also says that there's some evidence around "preterm birth and infection during pregnancy and also some birth complications".

But Ms Russell says it's important to put those possible factors into perspective.

"I honestly believe that the vast majority of the increase is due to what I would call a diagnostic culture," she says. "Our conception of the condition has changed, and that's meant that there's been an increase."
 
No, merely more people who are often mis-diagnosed with Autism. There are lots of pieces of shit in the world and some are misdiagnosed because being a piece of shit has traits that overlap with autism, some just fake it to get the disability checks and some are misdiagnosed because the overall quality of psychologists/psychiatrists/medical doctors has gotten much worse.
 
No, it's normalfags doing that normalfag thing of bandwagoning trending things they previously would have mocked or hated. It's as simple as that.

(If we ignore normalfags, it's just more people who legitimately are autistic are being diagnosed as autistic.)
 
Kids with "ADHD" or "autism" or whatever in the past were just told to shut up and settle down, and most of them did. They grew out of their restless leg bullshit by the time they were 20 and lived their lives like normal people, with maybe a quirk or two. It's only in the coddled modern age where everyone is sick, everyone has an "issue", and every kid has to be put on personality destroying pills just because they're a little hyper and mommy doesn't want to have to deal with it. We live in sick times.
 
Kids with "ADHD" or "autism" or whatever in the past were just told to shut up and settle down, and most of them did. They grew out of their restless leg bullshit by the time they were 20 and lived their lives like normal people, with maybe a quirk or two. It's only in the coddled modern age where everyone is sick, everyone has an "issue", and every kid has to be put on personality destroying pills just because they're a little hyper and mommy doesn't want to have to deal with it. We live in sick times.
We're no longer in the times where we encourage people to get their shit together because being an adult means that nobody gives a shit about your quirk or condition, because shit had to get done, and if you couldn't do it, you'd be quickly fired.

We're in the times of everyone now needing to have their own special condition and being coddled over it and that everyone needs to not only acknowledge it, but respect it and even in some cases celebrate it.

So, we have a confluence of doctors over-diagnosing things, because they're either lazy or bought off by Big Pharma, coupled with a deeply unhealthy society that has taught itself to value weakness over virtually anything else that we used to value as a species, because being labeled as something is more important that overcoming the symptoms of that condition. It's an easy out for people who know they're mediocre.

About ten years ago or so, a guy I knew remarked his daughter had Oppositional Defiance Disorder. I mused out loud that used to be called being a brat. I don't think I could have gotten away with that today, but I was probably more correct than I thought at the time.
 
In a way, yes because autism used to mean just those who would shit themselves and smear their feces everywhere. Now Thomas who used to obsess over bridges gets put in, while in the past he would be talked about as being that strange friendly guy who loves bridges. But at the same time, there has been an increase for those who are just socially awkward and quiet who get thrown underneath the autistic label, and self diagnosing people who want to make themselves feel quirky.
 
We have more people getting diagnoses of autism and other "mental disorders" because we have rewarded them for it.
Whether or not there is more prevalence of autism that is not just "better detection", SJWs frame ASD as "diversity" and oppose finding a cure as "oppression" (which is BS). And if there is more autism, it could be a number of things. Parents having kids later, etc. Also, seems modern urban "society" may not be good for mental health either way.
 
I think it's a combination of things, but actual autism going up is probably only a fraction of it. I would imagine "Aspergers" and making it a "spectrum" everyone is on adds to the number of people who get a diagnosis. Part of it is adding things to an autism diagnosis that shouldn't be there. So what if a person prefers computers or machines to people and doesn't like eye contact, it just makes them a geek. not autistic. Then there's parents who shop around for an autism diagnosis, like ADHD in the 90s, driving the numbers up. Bad parenting, though something as old as humanity, is a lot easier and more socially accepted, enabled by parking your kid in front of a tablet and letting the algorithm decide what they see. Those kids raised during Elsagate are, what, in their teens now? Soy and microplastics in everything may be making everyone a little more autistic, and something needs to be done about that, but that doesn't let the bad parents and greedy pharma off the hook.
 
The diagnosis has been broadened to the point of meaninglessness.

It is funny that the Autism Level 3 rise correlates very well with the decline in “mental retardation” or “developmental disability” figures. It’s just a label game for Medicaid and insurance billing. Parents prefer to have an autistic kid to a retarded one.

The autism level 1 is just over coddling bullshit. Some who is socially awkward, or has trouble with interpersonal relationships, doesn’t require a diagnosis. But you can’t bill without Dx!
 
The numbers and growth in the numbers are difficult to explain with any of these easy answers:


The Autism rate in the US in 2000 was 1 in 150
The Autism rate in the US 2024 is 1 in 31

3% of all children in the US are now diagnosed with Autism.

The eightfold increase in new diagnoses that Ginny Russell found included Asperger's syndrome, which was seen as a particular type of autism.

Another subset of autism added to the manuals was a "safety net diagnosis" called "pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified" (PDD-NOS) and that increased the numbers too.

The problem with that is that we know the rate of Asperger's diagnoses over time before it was combined with autism and we know the historical rates of PDD-NOS diagnoses as well before they were combined into Autism. If you add them historically together, You STILL end up with a massive growth rate. Contrary to what this article says, all the data is there to validate if PDD-NOS and Aspergers are responsible for the eightfold increase in Autism and the data says that they are not.

But the purpose of the article to convince people that there is no reason to be concerned about the growth in the numbers, that they should just accept it without question and accept that there is no reason to do any further research on the causes in the growth in those numbers.

The other thing worth mentioning is that if a journalist wants a medical opinion on a medical condition, they should not be going to an associate professor of psychiatry.
 
Western society is set up so that if you lack power you gain power, so being disabled, black, trans, gay or a woman puts you in a higher social status and more power.
So people are saying they have these things as it is seen as I need to be this .
 
I know people who doctor shop for adhd so they can get adderall but I genuinely don't see the benefit of being diagnosed as autistic besides brownie points

The value in the US has to do with insurance diagnostic codes and the types of treatments that the insurance companies will pay for. You can game the system for more care and more expensive care if the doctor gives you the right dianostic code. In certain situations, an autism diagnosis can be of useful in that way.
 
Back
Top Bottom