UK Apple pulls data protection tool after UK government security row

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1740159462427.png

Apple is taking the unprecedented step of removing its highest level data security tool from customers in the UK, after the government demanded access to user data.

Advanced Data Protection (ADP) means only account holders can view items such as photos or documents they have stored online through a process known as end-to-end encryption.

But earlier this month the UK government asked for the right to see the data, which currently not even Apple can access.

Apple did not comment at the time but has consistently opposed creating a "backdoor" in its encryption service, arguing that if it did so, it would only be a matter of time before bad actors also found a way in.

Now the tech giant has decided it will no longer be possible to activate ADP in the UK.

It means eventually not all UK customer data stored on iCloud - Apple's cloud storage service - will be fully encrypted.

Data with standard encryption is accessible by Apple and shareable with law enforcement, if they have a warrant.

In a statement the Home Office said: "We do not comment on operational matters, including for example confirming or denying the existence of any such notices."

In a statement Apple said it was "gravely disappointed" that the security feature would no longer be available to British customers.

"As we have said many times before, we have never built a backdoor or master key to any of our products, and we never will," it continued.

The ADP service is opt-in, meaning people have to sign up to get the protection it provides.

From 1500GMT on Friday, any Apple user in the UK attempting to turn it on has been met with an error message.

Existing users' access will be disabled at a later date.

It is not known how many people have signed up for ADP since it became available to British Apple customers in December 2022.

Prof Alan Woodward - a cyber-security expert at Surrey University - said it was a "very disappointing development" which amounted to "an act of self harm" by the government.

"All the UK government has achieved is to weaken online security and privacy for UK based users," he told the BBC.

"It was naïve of the UK government to think they could tell a US technology company what to do globally," he added.

What did the UK ask for?

The request was served by the Home Office under the Investigatory Powers Act (IPA), which compels firms to provide information to law enforcement agencies.

Apple would not comment on the notice and the Home Office refused to either confirm or deny its existence, but the BBC and the Washington Post spoke to a number of sources familiar with the matter.

It provoked a fierce backlash from privacy campaigners, who called it an "unprecedented attack" on the private data of individuals.

Two senior US politicians said it was so serious a threat to American national security that the US government should re-evaluate its intelligence-sharing agreements with the UK unless it was withdrawn.

It is not clear that Apple's actions will fully address those concerns, as the IPA order applies worldwide and ADP will continue to operate in other countries.

In its statement, Apple said it regretted the action it had taken.

"Enhancing the security of cloud storage with end-to-end-encryption is more urgent than ever before," it said.

"Apple remains committed to offering our users the highest level of security for their personal data and are hopeful that we will be able to do so in future in the UK."

The row comes amid growing push-back in the US against regulation being imposed on its tech sector from elsewhere.

In a speech at the AI Action Summit in Paris at the beginning of February, US Vice President JD Vance made it clear that the US was increasingly concerned about it.

"The Trump administration is troubled by reports that some foreign governments are considering tightening the screws on US tech companies with international footprints," he said.

BBC News
Archive
 
Last edited:
What counts as a uk user? Would someone from another country going through the uk for work travel for example be still covered by their encryption while in the uk?
 
What counts as a uk user? Would someone from another country going through the uk for work travel for example be still covered by their encryption while in the uk?

Or can you turn it on while you're outside of the UK and then it continues to function when you return?

Can you use a VPN to make it believe you're outside the UK?
 
Can't wait to see if Trump brings this up with Stamer in their talks on Monday. Bonus points if he does it publicly.
 
Rape gangs? I sleep.
Boat invasions? I sleep.
Marauding Hamas activists? I sleep.
Repressed bisexual man wants to declare war on a nuclear superpower? I sleep.

Basic cyber security? REEEEEE.

Truly, this is the legislative activity the British people desperately need.
 
They fought the FBI in the US hard. What the hell made them bend over to the UK so easily?
 
They fought the FBI in the US hard. What the hell made them bend over to the UK so easily?
In a way, they kind of are. They did refuse to give them any backdoor into the encryption. I believe the UK was threatening to ban them if they didn’t give a backdoor into that type of encryption, so they cut the UK off from using it.
 
What do you mean "bend over"? They pulled the service instead of complying.
It's surprising to me that they just took down the service very fast considering the fights they've put up in the past.
 
It's surprising to me that they just took down the service very fast considering the fights they've put up in the past.
Tbf they could fight if they wanted to, but they are a US company in the UK, they will lose.
 
It's surprising to me that they just took down the service very fast considering the fights they've put up in the past.
With the state that Britain is currently in, it's probably easier for Apple to shrug and go "Whatever, we're pulling out." Easier to wait for a less retarded government to get back into power and restart deals/negotiations than deal with tinpot commie dictators drunk on a powertrip.
 
It's surprising to me that they just took down the service very fast considering the fights they've put up in the past.
First, the law is very clear on this issue. The state has arrogated to itself the right to demand these back doors be put in place, with a clear schedule of very large fines as punishment for non-compliance.

Second, Apple cannot comply with the demand; it is physically impossible.

Third, the UK is no longer a significant market for Apple.

Apple don't want to spend years in a protracted battle with the UK government over something that they cannot resolve. British courts do not have the same power to overturn law as American courts and are unlikely to grant any sort of injunctive relief in the matter, so Apple will be facing huge fines, which will become significantly greater than the revenue they take from UK customers in short order. It's cheaper for them to withdraw the app entirely.
 
The times they are a-changin'. Used to be Apple was the only big tech company you could trust to go to the mat over privacy and security.
Just like every other company they use a lot of third parties to process personal info, they dont not use it for advertising or for sale, apple phones also constantly send out a map of infrared dots that measure your face constantly to be able to use face I'd, not saying it's a security risk but there's a chance that it could be.
 
Suffer, Apple fags. Your phones can't get virus but you can get spied on. Suck it, you fart huffing faggots.
I hope everyone gets arrested for mean tweets.
If anything this proves all the other brands already got on their knees and sucked the House of Lord's cocks.
 
Back
Top Bottom