US AP: Biden vows abortion legislation as top priority next year - Too little, too late gramps. I see they have their priorities in order.

  • 🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Biden vows abortion legislation as top priority next year
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By Seung Min Kim
2022-10-18 20:03:39GMT

roe.jpg
President Joe Biden speaks about abortion access during a Democratic National Committee event, Tuesday, Oct. 18, 2022, at the Howard Theatre in Washington. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden promised Tuesday that the first bill he sends to Capitol Hill next year will be one that writes abortion protections into law — if Democrats control enough seats in Congress to pass it — as he sought to energize his party’s voters just three weeks ahead of the November midterms.

Twice over, Biden urged people to remember how they felt in late June when the Supreme Court overturned the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion, fresh evidence of White House efforts to ensure the issue stays front of mind for Democratic voters this year.

“I want to remind us all how we felt when 50 years of constitutional precedent was overturned,” Biden said in remarks at the Howard Theatre, “the anger, the worry, the disbelief.”

He repeatedly lambasted Republicans nationwide who have pushed for restrictions on the procedure, often without exceptions, and told Democrats in attendance that “if you care about the right to choose, then you gotta vote.”

As he has done all year, Biden emphasized that only Congress can fully restore abortion access to what it was before the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson, which overturned Roe. But he also acknowledged “we’re short a handful of votes” now to reinstate abortion protections at the federal level, urging voters to send more Democrats to Congress.

“If we do that, here’s the promise I make to you and the American people: The first bill that I will send to the Congress will be to codify Roe v. Wade,” Biden said. “And when Congress passes it, I’ll sign it in January, 50 years after Roe was first decided the law of the land.”

That’s a big if.

For Biden to follow through on his pledge, Democrats would have to retain control of the House and pick up seats in the Senate — an unlikely scenario considering current political dynamics. Abortion rights have been a key motivating factor for Democrats this year, although the economy and inflation still rank as chief concern for most voters.

Abolishing the filibuster — the legislative rule that requires 60 votes for most bills to advance in the Senate — amid opposition in their own ranks will also pose a significant challenge for Democrats.

Long resistant to any revisions to Senate institutional rules, Biden said in the days after the June decision to overrule Roe that he would support eliminating the supermajority threshold for abortion bills, just as he did on voting rights legislation.

But two moderate Democrats — Sens. Kyrsten Sinema, Ariz., and Joe Manchin, W.Va. — support keeping the filibuster. Sinema has said she wants to retain the filibuster precisely so any abortion restrictions backed by Republicans would face a much higher hurdle to pass in the Senate.

Democratic Senate candidates in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — the party’s two best chances to flip seats currently held by Republicans — have both said they support eliminating the filibuster in order to pass abortion legislation. Pennsylvania Senate candidate John Fetterman has actively campaigned on being the 51st vote for priorities such as legalizing abortion, codifying same-sex marriage protections, and making it easier for workers to unionize — all measures that would otherwise be blocked by a filibuster in the Senate.

Abortion — and proposals from some Republicans to impose nationwide restrictions on the procedure — have been a regular fixture of Biden’s political rhetoric this election cycle, as Democrats seek to energize voters in a difficult midterm season for the party in power in Washington.

In fundraisers and in political speeches, Biden has vowed to reject any abortion restrictions that may come to his desk in a GOP-controlled Congress. Like he did on Tuesday, Biden has also urged voters to boost the Democratic ranks in the Senate so enough senators would not only support reinstating abortion nationwide, but would change Senate rules to do it.

Opponents of abortion rights have also sought to capitalize on the issue, with Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, saying Tuesday that the stakes of next month’s midterm elections “could not be higher.”

“Doubling down on an extreme agenda of abortion on demand until birth won’t stop Democrats from losing Congress, even with the abortion industry spending record sums to elect them,” Dannenfelser said. “Biden’s party is on the wrong side and stunningly out of touch.

On Tuesday, Biden made a pointed appeal to young voters, who traditionally participate in lower rates than other age demographics in midterm elections. Though his remarks were primarily focused on abortion, Biden also mentioned his decisions to forgive billions of dollars in student loan debt and to issue pardons for marijuana possession — moves popular with younger voters.

“What I am saying is, you represent the best of us. Your generation will not be ignored, will not be shunned and will not be silent,” Biden said, adding: “In 2020, you voted to deliver the change you wanted to see in the world. In 2022, you need to exercise your power to vote again for the future of our nation and the future of your generation.”

Court decisions and state legislation have shifted — and sometimes, re-shifted — the status of abortion laws across the country. Currently, bans are in place at all states of pregnancy in 12 states. In another, Wisconsin, clinics have stopped providing abortions though there’s dispute over whether a ban is in effect. In Georgia, abortion is banned at the detection of cardiac activity -- generally around six weeks and before women often know they’re pregnant.

Meanwhile, codifying Roe remains a broadly popular position. In a July AP-NORC poll, 60% of U.S. adults said they believe Congress should pass a law guaranteeing access to legal abortion nationwide.

Even with the economy dominating so much of the midterm discourse, abortion has been a touchstone in high-profile contests from Ohio to Arizona, especially as Democrats try to trap Republicans between their most ardent anti-abortion base voters who want absolute or near-total bans and a majority of U.S. adults that wants at least some legal access to elective abortions.

For instance, in Georgia, Republican Senate nominee Herschel Walker went so far in his only debate against Sen. Raphael Warnock, a Democrat, as to deny his previous support for a national abortion ban with no exceptions. Despite Walker’s previous statements captured on video, he insisted Warnock misrepresented his position. Walker said in the debate that he backs a Georgia statute outlawing abortion after six weeks of pregnancy – an effective ban for some women because it’s so early they don’t yet know they’re pregnant. The law includes exceptions for later abortions in cases of rape, incest and involving health risks to a woman.

Warnock, meanwhile, avoided direct questions about whether he’d support any abortion limits, instead turning the question to Walker’s position.
 
They really think Roe is a huge issue even though all polling indicates it is well behind most things.
Waiting until after the Republicans take the House? That's some top priority.

According to 538:
73% chance for Republican House
37% chance for Republican Senate
Does not bode well if Nickel Plate Nate is giving those odds.
 
I see the administration is choosing every option except those that resonate with the most Americans - namely, that of fixing the economic mess its currently in, or at least attempting to mitigate some of the growing inflation.
 
I see the administration is choosing every option except those that resonate with the most Americans - namely, that of fixing the economic mess its currently in, or at least attempting to mitigate some of the growing inflation.
Even if they had the ability to do those things, they probably wouldn't.
 
biden i need help, everything is expensive

UH ABORTIONS

biden please

UH MORE MONEY FOR UKRAINE

biden, think about the american people

YOURE NOT BLACK, NO MALARKY
 
I see the administration is choosing every option except those that resonate with the most Americans - namely, that of fixing the economic mess its currently in, or at least attempting to mitigate some of the growing inflation.
Abortion was caused by those DAMN DIRTY RETHUGLIKKKANS please ignore that we had fifty years to codify it into law and all the economic issues being confronted would mean the DNC would have to take responsibility for something.
 
They really think Roe is a huge issue even though all polling indicates it is well behind most things.

Does not bode well if Nickel Plate Nate is giving those odds.
Literally every Democrat ad in my turbo-blue state is whining about Abortion and Biden bringing back Trump's policy on insulin prices.
That's all they have and they deserve to lose massively this year.
 
Do they go as far as admitting the policy on Insulin prices was Trump's, or do they gloss over that fact?
lol it's reframed as "Our <insert democrat incumbent> fought to let Medicare negotiate lower insulin prices", because they baked that in as a line item in the Inflation Reduction Act
 
"If democrats control enough seats to pass it"

Ah so this is just hollow midterm campaigning rhetoric. Even if this is your top priority, can you honestly rely on Biden to 1. keep his word on anything and 2. Actually get it done? He literally cannot stop lying. Everything that comes out of his mouth is complete bullshit regardless of your personal optics. Even if this were my top priority, why should I believe you now? the amount of blatant dishonesty and unreliability of this administration is unbelievable, and the bar is already pretty low for politicians so that's saying something.
 
Why didn't they do it now when they have people now? They aren't likely to gain many seats next year, so passing such a bill would be harder.

Methinks there's too many hard-left Democrats in the house that they can't even compromise with something in favor of abortion, like "first two trimesters allowed, third trimester is state's choice". The discontinuation of Roe doesn't even affect blue states, which can continue to do whatever, and as a result is probably less of an issue for the constituents.
 
Waiting until after the Republicans take the House? That's some top priority.
Bold move Cotton.... let's see if it works for em'

On a serious note, it was obvious within 72 hours of Dobbs being handed down that the Dems were not going to be able to use abortion to carry the midterms, there simply wasn't any outrage except from , well, the Dems, Twitter, and the all the branch campuses of Dangerhair U,

Normal people just didn't care that you couldn't kill your baby in all 50 states. But they're still trying, mostly because they've got nothing else.

Literally every Democrat ad in my turbo-blue state is whining about Abortion and Biden bringing back Trump's policy on insulin prices.
That's all they have and they deserve to lose massively this year.
Question, hyping up abortion is a no-brainer, but, how are they framing the regulating of drug prices as a Bad Thing (tm) ? Is it bad because it's Trump's idea? Or are they saying that high drug prices are actually good for the economy?
 
Last edited:
But it will very likely be impossible next year. And he/they know this.

Biden is a fucking dick.
It's impossible now. They didn't actually nuke the legislative filibuster in either chamber, despite Schumer's posturing about it, and there are absolutely enough hardline pro-lifers in the House to torpedo any Roe vs. Wade codification by that means.
There's been rumblings among the moderate Republicans that a compromise could be worked, but even then it'd a) probably piss off the progs just as much as the pro-lifers, and b) they can't get 15 Republican senators to endorse it anyways.
The Supreme Court really picked a fortuitous time to kick the issue back to the states, because Congress is juuuuuuust polarized enough for no congressional overreaction to overturning Roe vs. Wade to be possible.
 
Back
Top Bottom