"angry" gamers/critics

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
friedshrimp said:
I mean, cartoon spergs wouldn't be so annoying if it wasn't for the fact that they spent all their time praising a show for its "never before seen" morals, and trashing cartoons of old because they were just "stupid with no morals!" yet I have two problems with that.

1) Nothing is new. Almost every cartoon has the same morals. Be kind, do good onto others, etc etc. Their precious Steven Universe probably shares morals in common with Care Bears. So really stop praising and claiming "this show is bringing back empathy to our world" since literally every single piece of kid's media has that same message.

2) Then the cartoon spergs go out of their way to praise old cartoons like Rugrats, Hey Arnold, Batman, saying how "they changed the field of animation" and "had good never before seen morals that weren't previously depicted in children's media". So what is it then? Were old cartoons aimless or not? What are the "horrible" moral-less cartoons that they always seem to have a grievance with? Cow and Chicken?
Click to expand...
Cartoons like Looney Tunes, 60s era Hannah-Barbara, and Rocky & Bullwinkle, because they're old, ergo full of "VALUE DISSONANCE" or some other junk.
 
friedshrimp said:
I mean, cartoon spergs wouldn't be so annoying if it wasn't for the fact that they spent all their time praising a show for its "never before seen" morals, and trashing cartoons of old because they were just "stupid with no morals!" yet I have two problems with that.

1) Nothing is new. Almost every cartoon has the same morals. Be kind, do good onto others, etc etc. Their precious Steven Universe probably shares morals in common with Care Bears. So really stop praising and claiming "this show is bringing back empathy to our world" since literally every single piece of kid's media has that same message.

2) Then the cartoon spergs go out of their way to praise old cartoons like Rugrats, Hey Arnold, Batman, saying how "they changed the field of animation" and "had good never before seen morals that weren't previously depicted in children's media". So what is it then? Were old cartoons aimless or not? What are the "horrible" moral-less cartoons that they always seem to have a grievance with? Cow and Chicken?
Click to expand...
They just annoy me because they try so hard to justify being weirdos who like kiddie shows. Just own up to just enjoying them because you think they're funny or enjoyable for you you insecure shits.
 
Damn... I NEVER thought I'd have to do this much commenting around here... Oh, well. That's just another day of fun of Kiwi Farms for me, honestly. More than anything, excuse me for missing out on this great conversation!


NARPASSWORD said:
Cartoons like Looney Tunes, 60s era Hannah-Barbara, and Rocky & Bullwinkle, because they're old, ergo full of "VALUE DISSONANCE" or some other junk.
Click to expand...

Including Tom & Jerry & MGM's other stuff, Those are some of the best cartoons one can immerse themselves in to understand EXACTLY WHY people miss them so much and want that level of quality to actually come back someday (if that's even possible, of course! It isn't ATM, sadly enough. But it's good to dream, right? I think it still is, myself.). But you try telling that to fools like Enter or PhantomStrider, or worse - anyone brainwashed by their crybaby BS.


TVBForever said:
The fact that he (PhantomStrider) is short on ideas, he's out of touch with jokes or topics or anything else, and he's using the same consensus as most people in the animation community (three of them are especially still true) still boggles my mind as to why the animation community is still relevant; I mean are we ready for yet another Star Butterfly on the list?

Plus where are the female characters from adult animated shows like Aeon Flux? How about including females from animated shows based off video games like Cammy from Street Fighter Animated or Lara Croft from ReVision: Tomb Raider Animated? How about some anime characters like Bulma, Froppy, Sailor Moon, Akko, Revy, Kyoko Kirigiri, Misato Katsuragi... anyone?! I mean, at least most of the characters I mentioned here can defeat Thanos than the ones on the list easily.
Click to expand...

Yeah - Is it OK that I hate Star Vs. because of the MC? No, not at all? Too bad. I've said it before; I'm saying it loud and proud now. It's like everyone wants to use that unlikable tard as some poster child for strong, independent female character, when so, so many better female characters are out there - most of them definitely from yesteryear (I'll let you pick examples, yourself.); especially where these SJWs weren't a problem getting in the way of that, too.
Furthermore, I have to agree that most of those anime characters are way more capable, when you watch their shows and see why, compared to an obnoxious cunt like Star, so no argument there (this from the guy who watches very few anime over western fare, too, admittedly!).


friedshrimp said:
I mean, cartoon spergs wouldn't be so annoying if it wasn't for the fact that they spent all their time praising a show for its "never before seen" morals, and trashing cartoons of old because they were just "stupid with no morals!" yet I have two problems with that.

1) Nothing is new. Almost every cartoon has the same morals. Be kind, do good onto others, etc etc. Their precious Steven Universe probably shares morals in common with Care Bears. So really stop praising and claiming "this show is bringing back empathy to our world" since literally every single piece of kid's media has that same message.

2) Then the cartoon spergs go out of their way to praise old cartoons like Rugrats, Hey Arnold, Batman, saying how "they changed the field of animation" and "had good never before seen morals that weren't previously depicted in children's media". So what is it then? Were old cartoons aimless or not? What are the "horrible" moral-less cartoons that they always seem to have a grievance with? Cow and Chicken?
Click to expand...

THANK YOU. Thank you so fucking much for understaning the hypocrisy on display here.
If anything, I wish Western Animation had LESS moral BS holding it down - kids don't need to have morals force-fed to them. No one does. If anything they (and that includes those older than kids, too, especially!) need stuff that's just fun to watch again - and that's all that's really needed. You know, like back when cartoons were taking off: stuff like @NARPASSWORD mentioned, including Tom & Jerry and MGM's other old-school properties that emerged alongside that, really.
Plus, there are so many obscure shows out there that knew better than this (I won't say examples here, I just know this for a FACT.) moral BS, as it is - and it sucks that they get lost in the ether, simply because "MUH MORALS!". As a cartoon fan, myself (especially while seeking out obscure and unpopular fare, simply to keep things interesting in my everyday life.), it's so damn sad & pathetic to see such coddling of 3-5 shows (when there's a whole universe out there to explore in this medium, like I'm happy to see some of us around here do when we can get away with it - keep on kicking ass at that, BTW.), it honestly hurts.


Adamska said:
They just annoy me because they try so hard to justify being weirdos who like kiddie shows. Just own up to just enjoying them because you think they're funny or enjoyable for you you insecure shits.
Click to expand...

Pretty much this...
And I proudly admit (:autism:, :autism:, :autism: that is otherwise is.) that I love me my cartoons and that won't ever change (despite my obvious-as-fuck), but yeah - IT IS IMPORTANT that these fuckers stop bothering everyone about it, as well as, for fucking once, try out other mediums like normal people (including me and you Kiwis here) actually do in general - like sports or live-action (even if it's just movies.), and books (definitely books - even if they're digital!), for example.

For me, it's always been about watching and indulging in what you like (these mediums (cartoons, movies, some sports & books, etc.) being examples.); never, ever for brownie points. Which is exactly what wanting validation entails in every sense; something these FOOLS do not get and refuse to clearly get, too. If you're only doing it for wanting validation (brownie points), you're wasting your life - and the lives of others who just want to enjoy what they do in peace - as in without making a big deal about it. TRUTH.


TVBForever said:
I mean it's not surprising that the animation aspies; especially in their mid-to-late 20s; are liable to include a cartoon character whose 15-years-old on the list of sexy cartoon characters considering that in America, you will get caught for sexually fantasizing an underage woman. This is not different with the anime community; although sex laws in Japan is different seeing as by the age of 13; regardless of either male or female; that age is a mandatory requirement to get in a relationship; but forbids fornication until age 18 according to Japan's Children Welfare Act ch. 34 (Archived source here). But anyway, considering that Star vs. the Forces of Evil is an American cartoon, at least we could see people like Valiksibum and PhantomStrider (yeah, the latter is Australian, I know, shaddup!) in a prison cell sometime soon.

Anyway, I honestly though Star vs. declined quality by the end of Season 2. But considering these spergs are in a rat race to defend that, as well as Steven Universe, the woke af She-Ra reboot, "90s cartoons," or any other bullshit, and claim (as well as make shit rumors) that Teen Titans Go!, Pickle and Peanut, and Uncle Grandpa are bad for your children; more ad revenue. I mean, YouTube nowadays wants to be safe and generic as possible. The community is the equivalent to the Christian pastors back in the '50s-'90s spreading rumors about how rock music is "satanic music" or how annoying soccermoms defend Hilary Clinton and Jack Thompson throughout the '90s-'2000s about how video games like Resident Evil, Pokemon, Grand Theft Auto, Silent Hill, or Mortal Kombat and punk, metal, or rap artists; like Ice Cube, Slayer, Cannibal Corpse, Eminem, Insane Clown Posse, and Marilyn Manson; are "bad influences for children," and this decade with SJW's, NPC's, normies, leftists, and the same groups I mentioned claiming everything is evil, any forms of entertainment needs to be political, that "drumpf" needs to be impeached, or other stupid bullshit they like to throw in like a bunch of preschoolers in a playground field.
Click to expand...

Damn. What else can I say... Other than so much truth, here. *CLAPS HANDS*
And TTG!, Pickle & Peanut, and Uncle Grandpa are just dumb fun (if you're in the right mindset to sit down to them, of course.). I mean, fuck me sideways, THAT is something kids have a lot of when watching any kind of silly shite for clicks on YouTube, as it is. Knowing this - I think I know who the real soccer-moms are around here (especially Enter & PhantomStrider). And as long as people keep agreeing with these re-tards, it's only gonna get worse, honestly.

Yeah - it felt good to get all that out of me. This shit just pisses me off with how embarrassing it all comes off. I know it's important to stick up for a medium you like, better yet love - too bad there needs to be both limits and balance, so you don't come off sounding like - well, just another soccer-mom (you know, like what Enter & PhantomStrider truly are in drag! LOL - I'll show myself out now...).
 
friedshrimp said:
I mean, cartoon spergs wouldn't be so annoying if it wasn't for the fact that they spent all their time praising a show for its "never before seen" morals, and trashing cartoons of old because they were just "stupid with no morals!" yet I have two problems with that.

1) Nothing is new. Almost every cartoon has the same morals. Be kind, do good onto others, etc etc. Their precious Steven Universe probably shares morals in common with Care Bears. So really stop praising and claiming "this show is bringing back empathy to our world" since literally every single piece of kid's media has that same message.

2) Then the cartoon spergs go out of their way to praise old cartoons like Rugrats, Hey Arnold, Batman, saying how "they changed the field of animation" and "had good never before seen morals that weren't previously depicted in children's media". So what is it then? Were old cartoons aimless or not? What are the "horrible" moral-less cartoons that they always seem to have a grievance with? Cow and Chicken?
Click to expand...
1) They aren't called spergs for a reason. If they realized Steven Universe is just Care Bears, but with crappier animation and a shot of LGBTQ "representation", they'd either claim SU is ripping off the Care Bears, claim Care Bears set the foundations for SU (lol no), or outright state that SU is a better Care Bears (which again, lol no).

2) There is some truth to what they say when those shows changed animation, but just because they changed animation doesn't mean they're good or hold up over the sands of time. Batman for instance, for every notable episode like Heart of Ice, there's 2-3 mediocre or outright terrible episodes. Hell, I could easily say Ren & Stimpy changed animation in that it helped with creator-driven cartoons, but that doesn't mean it's good. In fact, I'd argue it's the worst of the 90s Nicktoons outside of 1-2 shorts.

The morals part, I guess they're talking about 80s cartoons like Transformers, TMNT and their ilk. But even then you have examples like He-Man, which had morals at the end of each episode, and Bravestarr had an episode where a kid overdosed from a drug. Most of the shows they claim changed animation don't even have morals in them. So by their logic, they should be bashing Batman or Animaniacs for lacking proper morals, yet they praise them every chance they can get. Logic is not something they have.
 
Whenever I see her thumbnails I always think about how she's a fat cuckquean in real life
 
Sorry..... I already got a better review (careful of the spoilers, however.) from two good niggas known as Double Toasted, thank you very much. I'd watch that, instead.
 
2odastream said:
You actually watch and like Double Toasted?
Click to expand...

Sometimes, but not always. I just like what they had to say better. This review from CellSpex isn't encouraging me to invest time in it - let alone most of her reviews in general.
 
Shokew said:
Sometimes, but not always. I just like what they had to say better. This review from CellSpex isn't encouraging me to invest time in it - let alone most of her reviews in general.
Click to expand...
Kind of the reason why I put it in a thread dedicated to bad internet reviews.
 
2odastream said:
Kind of the reason why I put it in a thread dedicated to bad internet reviews.
Click to expand...

If it makes you feel any better, you've done a great service coming up with this good-ass shit. It's been enjoyable and rewarding emotionally to tear into some bad reviewers like this, actually.
 
Since people love their Phantom Strider content, have a guest appearance in a podcast.
 
693760

>tfw even James is going bald too.
 
So... If anyone's still keeping tabs on him, did anyone check out Enturd's "Admirable Animation" on TTG! to The Movies? Yes, you read that right.

I still think this only exists because he caved to peer pressure, or something like that.

EDIT: Now, keep in mind this is all IMHO. Don't go crazy. Please and thank you.
 
Last edited:

Overall nothing too bad, had some good ideas, but man that Christianity bashing was nuts. What church has he been going where the priest tells him to kill jews and blacks? :|
 
Wait, really? Someone reviewed enough Blue's Clues episodes to list the worst ones? Am I being punked?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom