- Joined
- Jun 18, 2015
Could you have set the bar any lower?
Not as low as Doug's scripts do. Like I say, Malcolm does the best with the shit he's given, but trying to create a Van Gogh with shit is always going to fall flat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could you have set the bar any lower?
I'm not even out to trash the guy but your praise is a bit ridiculous. He seems nice enough, but he's a bad actor and incidentally a furry.Not as low as Doug's scripts do. Like I say, Malcolm does the best with the shit he's given, but trying to create a Van Gogh with shit is always going to fall flat.
It might be the hat on a cop costume. Emphasis on "might be".As if he wasn't pretentious enough. Or lazy enough.
That only makes it worse if that's what it really is.It might be the hat on a cop costume. Emphasis on "might".
Also, I don't know why Malclom's suddenly getting praise for being a terrible skit actor. Sure Doug's worse in many ways. But I wouldn't even dare praise the others either. Heck, I'd probably praise Lewis before I praised an admitted furry.
Still, good for NC standards is pretty bad.Lol, me 'praising' Malcolm for being the best in a typical NC Skit is not exactly the same thing as sucking his dick. I'm merely saying that of all the NC skits I've seen, he was the best part by far. Though as someone else has said, its hardly the highest bar to get over.
Wow. I thought I had bad genes for hair loss.Holy shit you are right.
![]()
Or just wear a hat. Anything to cover that shit up.Prince William only gets away with his tragic hair loss because he's royalty, Matty. Have some dignity and Heisenberg that shit.
you might be reading a liiiiiiitle too much into it, dude...Can I just take a minute to talk about Sage's review of Æon Flux?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=hn--vXHDQ2E
He's entitled to his opinion (Personally, I love the show the same way I love shows like Evangelion or Twin Peaks, because they're daring, pretentious messes, not in spite of it), but one bone of contention for me is around 13:08-13:27. For reference, he praised the original 5-minute shorts over the longer episodes. During that timestamp, he considers the scene with Æon slipping a letter into one of Trevor's teeth caps gross. The problem is, that scene was from the first 5-minute episode, not the 30-minute series, and he edited it in a way to suggest it's from a 30 minute episode.
Sorry about the lengthy bitchposting, but now I'm curious if there are any more examples of Sage's manipulative editing.
At this point, Doug might as well just stop mentioning his "inspirations", especially since this is like what? The fifth time (you forgot Roger Ebert there)?His "storyline skits" are so fucking cringy. Just get on with the review and stop trying to be this grand actor/writer/director/producer/hollywood god. He also contradicts himself in many of his videos to be "hip"; he said that the Animaniacs were his idols, then it was Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, then it was Tom and Jerry, now it's Rocky and Bullwinkle. Didn't he state in another video that he found R&B extremely annoying?
... Really? Howard the Duck? How the fuck is that consider a remake of a cartoon? At least with having Extreme Ghostbusters on his worst reboots list, that choice was debatable meaning it could have or could not been appropriate for the list. This? there is absolutely no reason Howard the Duck should be on it at all.