"angry" gamers/critics

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Hmm, calls Veggietales preachy and "religious agenda" yet calls the terrorists that threatened South Park only "extremists". Nice going there, bub.

Also, it seems he's pulled a Doug and has turned video-making into his only job...Ouch.
You could start a campaign against choosing that as a full-time job. We could call it "Faces of Internet Reviewing":
Screenshot (219).png
GjOlEh7.jpg
CwYA-u3VIAAbMmI.jpg

"Internet Reviewing: Not Even Once."
 
Steven Universe clips (OF FUCKING COURSE!)

6. Sonic Boom
5. Clarence (WITH MENTION OF STEVEN UNIVERSE)
4. Uncle Grandpa
3. Veggie Tales (plays at Internet atheist here too)
2. Bojack Horseman (FUCK YOU STRIDER! BOJACK WAS ALWAYS GOOD!)
Honourable Mentions: Amazing World Of Gumball, Adventure Time
1. South Park (NO! FUCK YOU STRIDER! SOUTH PARK WAS ALWAYS GOOD TOO!)

Donatedonatedonatedonatedonate!
Wait, why is VeggieTales even on the list when he bashed it before?
 
He'd shit all over Prince of Egypt regardless of how good it is. The mere association with religious themes and elements automatically makes it "preachy" in his eyes.
Seriously, Veggie Tales is completely harmless. It's just an innocent cartoon for kids with some wholesome christian life lessons thrown in for educational or moral value. Nothing wrong with that.

....I wonder what sort of life situation you have to be in where looking into toddler cartoons is your main source of income. We live in a sad little world.
 
Something to do with it getting more parodical and less parochial. Also he claims that it's still the best of the few good religious cartoons out there (Muthafucka never seen the Prince Of Egypt I guess).
Yeah, but you'd figure he'd dislike the more recent stories as much as the originals.
 
Whatever gets the clickbux I guess.
This to a tee. The cartoon fucknuggets are going after views desperately via thumbnails and have no understanding how beating a dead horse is kryptonite to making something actually enjoyable. They also have no understanding of how the medium works, why something will never be cancelled, and are so lazy and pathetic will actually just rip off other videos for inspiration.
 
This to a tee. The cartoon fucknuggets are going after views desperately via thumbnails and have no understanding how beating a dead horse is kryptonite to making something actually enjoyable. They also have no understanding of how the medium works, why something will never be cancelled, and are so lazy and pathetic will actually just rip off other videos for inspiration.

Don't forget them outright regularly highlighting (positive look) OR bashing (negative look) the same damn things talked about too much over, and over, and over again, ad verbatim - to the point where I'd rather watch anything else, myself - no matter how good/bad it is, just to actually gauge it for myself than waste any of my time listening to losers like these.
 
Last edited:
Is it true that Tamara is latina/hispanic? I've heard it around, but honestly aside from her name nothing about her really suggests to me she's of hispanic descent.
 
What seems true is that she's very...very dumb. Like I've seen more of those "Tamara's never seen" videos, and she honestly strikes me as that dumb valley girl from school...


Again, one of those editorials that he overthinks too much. Though I kinda agree with him that the animation/design/colors is what really brings the second part of the movie down...
 
Last edited:
So James uploaded an update video explaining what his current production schedule is.
I think the most interesting segment is when he talks about his current AVGN production and how he's getting less and less time to work on them because he's got a 4 year old daughter and another on the way. It struck me that, even though James basically started the whole angry reviewer shit, he's actually way more personally adjusted than pretty much everyone else who tried or is trying it.

Think about it, James has pretty much settled down, he's got a wife and kids now. Sure, Doug has a wife, but can you imagine him having kids? James is pretty much the only "angry reviewer" I can think of who has kids and can think, "Oh, good for him!" instead of "Oh dear God no."
 
I like James. He has a pretty good feel for what he's talking about and he's always struck me as having a pretty mature outlook on his stuff outside his internet persona.
 
I like James. He has a pretty good feel for what he's talking about and he's always struck me as having a pretty mature outlook on his stuff outside his internet persona.
Same here. One thing that really stands about James compared to many game reviewers and that is he own many games and accessories, multiple of them rare.
 
The difference here is that James has a head on his shoulders. He's always known to differentiate between Nerd and himself, and so far the nerd stuff never really overlapped with his real life.

Doug, however, is stuck permanently and obsessed with being the Critic/being the next Spielberg, and is more concerned with bitching with his fans than doing anything useful with his life. He's pretty much stuck in the Peter Pan stage and that's why it's better he never has children (even though he looks like the typical average joe who would have kids and a normal desk job, and he's already aging like shit).

EDIT: Even though Doug is spergy as fuck, I'd be more worried about Spoony, Lewis or Lindsay having kids over him.
 
Last edited:
Between Lewis, Noah and Doug, who'd be the worst father?
Noah, definitely. None of them would be Father of the Year by any means, but it could be argued Lewis and Doug have the self-discipline, work ethic, and fortitude necessary to raise and provide for a family, whereas Noah can barely take care of his own basic needs.

Also I'd really feel bad for any mini-Antwilers who could inherit Noah's mental illnesses, but I digress.
 
Back
Top Bottom