US Amanda Seyfried’s Prosthetic Butthole - 🤖 🫱(‿¤‿)🫲 🤖

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article (Archive)
1772179265230.png
On Wednesday, Amanda Seyfried told The Scott Mills Breakfast Show that while filming nude scenes for her leading role in The Testament of Ann Lee, she wore—drumroll, please—a prosthetic butthole.
And folks, it’s news like this that I come to the internet for.

The Testament of Ann Lee is a historical musical drama about…Ann Lee, the religious leader who journeyed from England to America in the 1700s to form the United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Appearing, a Christian sect known as the Shakers. “This movie needed to be graphic, so I had a prosthetic butthole,” Seyfried explained. Yes, naturally, you would need a prosthetic butthole for this movie about a celibate religious sect, Amanda. I completely agree.
[!PROSTHETIC BUTTHOLE SPOILER ALERT!] The prosthetic in question appears in one of the film’s final scenes. “I was pregnant and naked, but I wasn’t naked at all, and at the end of the movie, I’m standing in front of a burning building with just a merkin,” she explained. “I felt so free.”

Unfortunately, she did clarify: “You cannot see my butthole in the scene, but I swear there is a prosthetic butthole there.” Release the butthole cut.

“It was cool. It was exciting,” she added. Sure. No big deal, Amanda. Like you didn’t just sell me the entire film in one sentence.
Whenever I’m sinking into the dull monotony of existence, I can always count on her to drop an unhinged quote and bring me back to life. Take, for example, the amazing bit of press she did for The Housemaid earlier this year, when she revealed she had “no idea” she was a producer on the film until three weeks into production.
Even if this prosthetic butthole story is just a sneaky bit of PR, you’ve gotta admit—at least it’s creative. I’ve heard a million press soundbites that are boring at best. Oh, Margot Robbie got Jacob Elordi a matching ring on the set of Wuthering Heights? I’m falling asleep. Liam Neeson and Pamela Anderson fell in love on the set of The Naked Gun. What do you take me for? An idiot?
Where’s the originality? Where’s the whimsy? Where are the prosthetic buttholes????
We need more celebrities like Seyfried who are willing to be silly, because media training is SO last year. This year, let’s get a little crazy with our PR. We could all use a bit more silliness in our lives.
Fewer assholes, more prosthetic buttholes. Thank you.


  • You can now rent out the Heated Rivalry cottage on AirBnB…[PopCrave]
  • Tate McRae is rumored to be dating that MAGA-coded hockey player, Jack Hughes. Way to betray Canada, Tate. [People]
  • Lily Allen confirms relationship with Sigmund Freud’s great-great-grandson. I can’t imagine how this could go wrong! [NME]
  • Tim Gunn shares that he has been celibate for 43 years. [PageSix]
  • Help! I can’t get the image of Benny Blanco’s dirty feet out of my brain. [People]
 
She had to have it amputated
Ok I'm confused here. Did she have her own butthole replaced by a (functional) prosthetic due to rectal cancer or something, then put a cosmetic prosthetic over that for a nude scene?

Or did she wear a realistic looking silicone ass so she technically wasn't nude to game the PG/NC/whateverthefucktheyare ratings?
 
I can't tell if this slop was written by an illiterate or an AI. What's even the context behind this? Did Seyfrieds have a colostomy or something?
The context is they need to market a movie and they decided mentioning they used a common filming trick to fake nudity when the actor did not want to do nudity would make for good PR.

This article is an ad.
 
The Shakers are sort of like a preview of what's happening in modern countries. You let women who hate sex and worship the rat race get too much control and influence then everybody stops having it and you end up dying off from no babies. Once again Paul got it right.
 
Last edited:
I hate every line of this article.

Everyone who contributed to the existence of this article should be shot dead.
 
Back
Top Bottom