Amanda Abbington blasted for doubling down on trans remark despite backlash - The actress is under fire for a comment made about the trans community

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
(Credit: Pierra Willix, Metro)

Amanda Abbington is under fire again after saying she was a supporter of the ‘legitimate trans community’.

Last week the Sherlock actress, 49, was the first contestant announced as part of the line-up for the upcoming season of Strictly Come Dancing, however soon after many people threatened to boycott the series after old tweets of hers emerged.

Earlier this year, Amanda reacted to footage from a Caba Baba Rave, a baby sensory and cabaret show for parents and their babies aged 0-2 years old.

Following a video of the rave showing a person dancing in boots and a bondage harness, the actress tweeted that the show was ‘not for babies’ and said that ‘if you think it is, there is something fundamentally wrong with you’.

Over the past week she’s repeatedly denied she is transphobic in response to the backlash, however now India Willoughby has weighed in.

Sharing a social media post written by Amanda, India, 57, wrote: ‘Amanda Abbington basically saying she’s transphobic because she’s looking-out for trans people – “who need protection”.

In the exchange, Amanda had been responding to a comment on her recent Instagram video in which she insisted she was not transphobic.

During part of the video, Amanda had said she was a supporter of the ‘legitimate trans community’.

When asked to explain that comment by a journalist, she responded that she ‘merely meant that I worry when I see men suddenly identifying as women when they think it’s going to benefit them’.

‘Predatory men. Not all but there have been some cases where this has happened and it doesn’t help the trans community because everyone then focuses on those people and it diminishes and endangers the trans community,’ she continued.

‘The trans community need protection. Women in refuges and prisons need protection. Predatory men will do anything. That’s all I mean. It’s such a delicate and complicated situation.

‘We just need to be aware of people who will take advantage of a community wishing to be understood and accepted.’

In her Instagram video this week, Amanda had doubled down on her past posts, but said they had nothing to do with the trans community.

‘My tweet back in March was regarding a 12-year-old who was doing it in front of adults, and it just upset me because I saw a kid, a little kid, a 12-year-old, doing something very over-sexualised and I didn’t think it was right,’ she said.

‘Personally speaking, I don’t think 12-year-olds should be performing in drag shows in overtly sexual ways because they’re 12 and they need a childhood, it’s nice for kids to have a childhood and grow up and find that out when they’re old enough to really understand it.’

She added that her tweet had not been ‘associated with the trans community, nor would I associate that with the trans community, because I think they’re two separate things’.

Going on to describe drag queens as ‘hilarious and brilliant and an art form’, Amanda added that she thought there was ‘absolutely a place’ for them in the entertainment industry.

(Link: https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertain...1&cvid=98774d4334d842e2b0d3b8889d8178d9&ei=41)

8989.jpg
 
Well it's some progress at least. At this time we aren't going to see anything bigger than this. But hopefully eventually we will. Take what you can get for now.
 
She's just a fucking closeted TERF, at least the Harry Potter woman has the balls to admit it.
 
Nothing quite like having a raging TERF melty over a comment like "I don't think 12 year olds should be doing drag" to make normal people wonder why the trans community doth protest so much about children doing sexual performances. :story:
 
I really hope she doesn't apologize. It's the worst thing you can do.
 
When asked to explain that comment by a journalist, she responded that she ‘merely meant that I worry when I see men suddenly identifying as women when they think it’s going to benefit them’.
That simple statement cuts straight to the core of the current Troon trends.

And the Troons will stop at nothing to try and silence or discredit anyone who says this before the public at large realizes that they're right.
 
Last week the Sherlock actress,
I wonder if there are still people out there salty that their uWu m/m Watson/Holmes pairing was never made a reality? That was a fun ride. Not the show, ofc, I mean the sperging around it.
Earlier this year, Amanda reacted to footage from a Caba Baba Rave, a baby sensory and cabaret show for parents and their babies aged 0-2 years old.

Following a video of the rave showing a person dancing in boots and a bondage harness, the actress tweeted that the show was ‘not for babies’ and said that ‘if you think it is, there is something fundamentally wrong with you’.
What exactly makes this a controversial statement?
 
That simple statement cuts straight to the core of the current Troon trends.

And the Troons will stop at nothing to try and silence or discredit anyone who says this before the public at large realizes that they're right.
You're sadly very right on this.

When rumours are circulating that some Climate Activists allegedly planted a bomb at the Shrewsbury Flower Show yesterday, who knows what these loonies are capable of.

They could definitely take the route of the IRA and try to scare/bomb us into submission.
 
Funny how she's trying to balance worshipping trannies but also acknowledging they're sexualizing kids and terrorizing women.

The only difference between a "legitimate trans person" and an illegitimate one is the sincerity of their gender delusions.
 
just to make sure everyone gets it... This:

Following a video of the rave showing a person dancing in boots and a bondage harness, the actress tweeted that the show was ‘not for babies’ and said that ‘if you think it is, there is something fundamentally wrong with you’.

Is what she was originally attacked over and the reason they were demanding her firing.
 
Back
Top Bottom