Culture ALPA Faces Backlash for Prioritizing DEI in Language Guidelines - The world’s largest airline pilot union, ALPA, has advised pilots to stop using terms deemed offensive to women and LGBTQ individuals Including “cockpit” and “manpower”

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
By LOTT Wire Staff
Published on June 19, 2024

1718814352575.jpeg

Article Summary​

The world’s largest airline pilot union, ALPA, has advised pilots to stop using terms deemed offensive to women and LGBTQ individuals, promoting inclusive language for solidarity and safety.
  • Inclusive Language: ALPA encourages pilots to use inclusive language to foster solidarity and safety.
  • Offensive Terms: The union specifically targets terms like “cockpit” and “manpower” as non-inclusive.
  • Policy Collaboration: ALPA collaborates with a United Nations agency on these policies.
  • Diverse Family Structures: Recommendations include avoiding terms like “mother/father” and “husband/wife” to respect diverse family dynamics.
  • Language Guide: The 2021 diversity, equity, and inclusion language guide provides detailed alternatives to traditional terms.
The world’s largest airline pilot union, Air Line Pilots Association, Int’l (ALPA), has urged the aviation community to stop using terms considered offensive to women and LGBTQ individuals, such as “cockpit.”

Representing over 70,000 pilots globally, ALPA collaborates with a United Nations agency on its policies. Their 2021 diversity, equity, and inclusion language guide lists several terms and phrases to avoid, particularly “masculine generalizations,” to promote inclusion and equity.


1718814337426.jpeg
The guide emphasizes that “inclusive language in communications is essential to our union’s solidarity and collective strength and is an important factor in maintaining flight safety.”

The guide suggests replacing “cockpit” with “flight deck,” citing that the former term has been used derogatorily to exclude women. It also advises against using terms like “manpower,” recommending “people/human power” instead, and discourages addressing groups as “guys” due to its non-inclusive nature.

ALPA also recommends avoiding “mother/father” and “husband/wife” to respect diverse family structures and same-sex couples.

1718814243528.jpeg
The largest airline pilot union urged airmen and women to avoid using terms considered offensive to women and LGBTQ individuals.

Linguist Ben Zimmer noted in a Wall Street Journal article that “cockpit” originated from 16th-century cockfighting, evolving to describe tense environments and later the area on British warships for treating the wounded.

Former FAA safety team representative Kyle Bailey told Fox News Digital that diversity has little to do with safe travel, emphasizing that flight experience and training are paramount. He noted that piloting remains predominantly male, with few young girls aspiring to be pilots.

Major airlines like United Airlines have faced criticism for their DEI initiatives. United’s CEO Scott Kirby drew backlash for promoting diversity goals, aiming for 50% of their graduating pilot classes to be women or people of color. This led to criticism from figures like Elon Musk and Center for Security Policy Senior Analyst J. Michael Waller, who suggested Kirby should resign to set an example.

Source (Archive)
 
Sorry, folks.

"Flight deck" doesn't go far enough to rectify the absolutely galling lack of representation of women for a hundred years when referring to the area of the plane where pilots sit. In 100 years we can talk about calling it something neutral like "flight deck."

For now, it's pussypit, and don't you forget it.
 
Aren't there already serious problems with a concerning lack of capable pilots and crews to service planes and this is the priority? I suppose coupled with cheap ass companies along with diversity at all costs is truly bringing us towards a competency crisis every single day.
 
Aren't there already serious problems with a concerning lack of capable pilots and crews to service planes and this is the priority? I suppose coupled with cheap ass companies along with diversity at all costs is truly bringing us towards a competency crisis every single day.
Yep

The pilot's unions are useless RETARDS anyway.

Instead of retarded shit like this they should be asking for better pilot training.
 
Aren't there already serious problems with a concerning lack of capable pilots and crews to service planes and this is the priority? I suppose coupled with cheap ass companies along with diversity at all costs is truly bringing us towards a competency crisis every single day.

For the commercial side of things, there's like two paths. The first is military aviation guys going to like Delta or United or whatever who move from mil av to the 737 and up. These guys are squared away and the armed forces shitcan those who can't right off the bat, so the sorting take place quickly and away from the public eye.

The next route is people going to civvie flight schools like Embry Riddle and working their way up from puddle jumpers up to turbo props and then the small jets up to the 737 types. This second group is a mixed bag of all sorts. Some are amazing pilots who just had to come up this way, some are shitbags who will CFIT when given the first chance. Part of this is that the newbies start at small aviation outfits and get pressures from passengers to fly when the weather sucks ass and they don't have IFR capabilities in the little planes. I flew in a Beechcraft Bonanza with a guy who is now a mainline 737 pilot - great guy and I'd fly with him wherever whenever. I also flew with a shitbird who augured into the side of a mountain bc he made bad choices.

My job requires me to fly on 4-6 people planes and you get a sense real quick of who you can trust and who you can't.
 
Back
Top Bottom