No, Kane acted stupid. He declared the ovomorphs to be eggs, that it had organic life still within, and he still put his face up to it. The reason it works though is it is perfectly within his character and does not contradict it. He was written in script to be a "rainbow chaser", and he was always the most gung-ho of the trio that went to the derelict. He makes a bad call based on what his character would actually do.
Spot on analysis. There's even a tiny background line where Kane tells the Captain "I'd like to volunteer to be in the first away team" and I think it's Lambert in the background who says "That figures." He's established to be the sort of person who would do that. (He's also the first one to actually get out of bed though that's maybe a very subtle misdirect to suggest he's the main character who wont die) The entire movie is really a masterclass in establishing characters with maximum economy. The meals scenes are superb for this. You have Brett raising the bonus situation but getting Parker to broach it, From Parker saying "you're in my chair" to Ash showing he's disliked, to Lambert pulling a face to Parker's pussy joke, Ripley's slight smile and return to her coffee when the bonus situation comes up - she knows how it will play out, that it will lead nowhere and is just sitting this one out. The way Ash is always watching everybody else and the tiny little cue of him staring at Kane right
before Kane starts convulsing. The way Parker and Brett have their entire scene with Ripley over a hissing steam vent only to shut it off the moment she's gone. I've rarely seen a film convey so much information with so much efficiency.
Kane is a space trucker. He's exploring the egg vault and interacting with the eggs because he's entranced by being in a giant alien ship. The characters in Prometheus and Covenant are supposed to be world class scientists. Who should not be petting the space cobras or removing their helmets. I can understand the cooks and helicopter pilots in The Thing not being military level cautious as well. And the military personnel in Event Horizon wanting to immediately leave the ship and blow it up. It shouldn't be the other way around.
There are supposed to be some constraints in Prometheus about not being able to get the pick of the crop for Weyland's crew - the need for secrecy, the fact that it's a multi-year voyage, things like that. But it's rather understated and the level of stupidity by some of those characters is still too much to actually be justified. You could write elements that justify some of the stupidity better with some effort on the writer's part. In Covenant, maybe they have to spelunk down some cliffs or get cut off and run low on oxygen and have to remove their helmets because "look, the instruments show it's breathable. You prefer to suffocate?"
I tend to be one of the more generous people when it comes to cutting some movies some slack. The world being against you is a very traditional trope of horror - the rain or the rock slide or the car not starting, all horror traditions and not without reason. It increases the sense of doom when done well. But in Prometheus and Covenant, not done well. In large part because we can attribute their misfortunes to the character's own stupidity.
If you watch Alien you can start down the road of "they were stupid" but as you watch it's revealed that the sabotage is deliberate. Just off the top of my head:
"Hey, why don't you just freeze him?" from Parker -> shut down by Ash before Dallas can really decide.
"What's it key off?" is Ripley questioning Ash's motion detectors. And the later "micro-changes in air density my ass!" as the thing starts failing leading the Dallas's abduction.
The letting them back on the ship, Dallas snapping back to Ripley "look, it happens that way because that's how the Company wants it". The list really does go on. About the only "stupid" thing you can actually lay on the crew is Ripley going back for the cat, and that's not really a question of intelligence so much as "you do you."
Some of the logic in Prometheus was so bad that I thought it was genuinely a plot point that it was. Like the stuff about Engineers creating humanity. We have a fossil record going back millions of years. so were they supposed to have created all life on Earth? The opening scene is just jagged rocks and water - there's no life depicted, not even plant life. So I think the intent was that they began all life. Which makes the timescales of the movie insane. If they're supposed to just be creating humanity, there's that largely unbroken evolutionary history of humanity we already have. If they're supposed to be uplifting humanity to greater sentience, then the part about them already sharing DNA with humans is nonsensical because we also share DNA with the rest of animal life so they're related to Earth's entire animal kingdom. It's so bad that I genuinely thought they must be setting this up as obviously false but no - they just have that little grasp of science.
It's because Ridley Scott is a contemptuous asshole who thinks he's smarter than you. He does that sort of shit a lot to try and flex his midwit knowledge of things.
Explains a lot. My own review was getting long so I skipped this but the Romulus and Remus stuff bothered me as well. The symbolism makes no sense to me. It really feels as if they're just throwing some mythical names onto it expecting this to make it deep. Promtheus at least made sense. (Covenant did not that I could see).
And actually, the religious insertions into Covenant bothered me. You want to show that the Captain is distrusted because of his faith, okay - you could make that interesting. Perhaps the future is heavily atheistic, perhaps there were religious wars and religion is now frowned upon, I don't know. (You want to be bold, though, make his faith Islam). But firstly it seems really arbitrary and secondly it just seems very mean in that his faith is ultimately depicted not merely ineffective but bogus. Is Ridley Scott a militant atheist or something? The captain's entire arc seems to be: "People don't trust me because I'm religious and now I've learned that all my faith is dumb, I dead now!" Way to kick someone when he's down!
Again, Ridley Scott's an asshole. He thinks this is what you deserve since you did not like his fart huffing creationist ancient aliens "masterpiece". Fun fact: He fought really hard and failed to blatantly state Jesus was a Giant Blue Man in the film, and bragged about that in interviews.
I thought his idea was supposed to be that they took a dude back to their home planet to educate him and teach him their beliefs and sent him back to teach humanity, and that dude was Jesus.
Daft plan by the Engineers either way.
Because current year can't make a franchise that has a woman protagonist replace her with a man... even as the industry is collapsing due to refusing to actually make shit audiences want. Also they're too chickenshit to ever change it, despite the actresses they hire never being as good as Weaver was, and thus forever being stuck in her shadow.
I'm actually lightly against switching the protagonists to male. I've no interest in some tit-for-tag "they made male character female so we'lll make female character male". Ripley is iconic and it adds a strong thematic element to the movies that she's female. A kind of positive female archetype - protective mother vs. the negative female archetype of the aliens - destructive Furies. And the whole rape inversion thing of the aliens impregnating men is part of the original horror. Ripley isn't "Woke" because she doesn't humiliate the men around her (except Burke - he deserves it) and isn't shown as better than then. She's competent and she is willing to get in a loader and demonstrate it when challenged. She doesn't show up men, she fits in with them. Which is kind of the opposite of Woke, really.
But as the movies go on, it does become odd to
always have a female protagonist. It goes from natural to forced. I was happy with Rain and Andy being kind of the duo protagonists by the end of Romulus. As I said, there's a lot to like about Romulus. It's not awful, so much as it is flawed. IMO.