AI Art Seething General

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm gonna have to look into this cuz it seems to be an absolute gold mine of lol suit content. The basic gist they have is AI art infringes on their copyright because the AI uses billions of images to create the picture.

The problem is that this is literally, by definition, fair use derivative work. Hoes mad, and hoes gonna lose. Should be fun to watch though
It SHOULD be a fair use derivative work, but there were two cases that ruled sampling in music was a copyright violation (there is another case that said it isn't). I'd expect that to be part of this case.
 
the art I've generated with AI in 30 seconds looks so fucking good I never want to pay you a goddamn dime for your half assed, overpriced services again.
It's unironically over for artcels. This is what they have to compete with: an AI that produce an image of this quality in less than a minute.
 
All the seething from self important, overpaid assholes makes me laugh. AI art is a tool like any other, and the output of the tool depends on user input and result selection.

Not my fault if the art I've generated with AI in 30 seconds looks so fucking good I never want to pay you a goddamn dime for your half assed, overpriced services again.

Stay mad.
View attachment 4302387
I'm still kind of oblivious to some of the details of actually making AI art. What program did you use to make this? Is it one of those you have to download?
 
All the 'good' AI art I've seen is either the same type of Victorian era big boob anime girl, Sam Does Art variant 268 or pop culture thing as an 80's dark fantasy film.

Maybe my fellow drawslaves are blowing the threat of AI art out of proportion?
 
I'm still kind of oblivious to some of the details of actually making AI art. What program did you use to make this? Is it one of those you have to download?
No, actually. It was just a version of Stable Diffusion 1.5 through the site Patience.ai, which has quite a few AI versions to choose from but not all are free. SD 1.5 is, tho, and this version gets some really good results for me.
 
No, actually. It was just a version of Stable Diffusion 1.5 through the site Patience.ai, which has quite a few AI versions to choose from but not all are free. SD 1.5 is, tho, and this version gets some really good results for me.
Thought you had to download stuff to get the really good art, thanks for letting me know.
 
I'm still kind of oblivious to some of the details of actually making AI art. What program did you use to make this? Is it one of those you have to download?
There are locally-run ones you can download and use, yes - usually involving downloading Python and pulling something from github. You have a number of different options too - Auto1111 (https://rentry.org/voldy) seems to be the most popular, but I'm a huge fan of InvokeAI ( https://invoke-ai.github.io/InvokeAI/installation/020_INSTALL_MANUAL/#pip-install ) and they've got a .bat installer, too.
 
Thought you had to download stuff to get the really good art, thanks for letting me know.
Downloading and doing your own setup gives you much greater variety in the models you can use as you're not limited to whatever model the online service decides to provide, as well as inpainting, img2img and upscaling modes which not all services provide. Unfortunately, that also means you need both the hardware and the computing time to run it (unless you have multiple GPUs, computer can become somewhat unresponsive when rendering).
 
All the 'good' AI art I've seen is either the same type of Victorian era big boob anime girl, Sam Does Art variant 268 or pop culture thing as an 80's dark fantasy film.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=I7kW2-4xdN8https://youtube.com/watch?v=B81PTCHs1bQ
https://youtube.com/watch?v=rX_b6E0JyXwhttps://youtube.com/watch?v=SlRpG75BQlI
Maybe my fellow drawslaves are blowing the threat of AI art out of proportion?
There is plenty of good ai art in any manner of styles. There are quite a few sites right now that display ai art with the prompt used to generate it and the tool to use to do so. Check out https://openart.ai for one. Artists really aren't blowing neural nets ability to completely wipe the floor with a lot of human talent, but they are overemphasizing the effect it'll have on the market. Especially for already established artists with well known styles.
 
All the seething from self important, overpaid assholes makes me laugh. AI art is a tool like any other, and the output of the tool depends on user input and result selection.

Not my fault if the art I've generated with AI in 30 seconds looks so fucking good I never want to pay you a goddamn dime for your half assed, overpriced services again.

Stay mad.
View attachment 4302387
I think a future area of improvement for AI image generation would be improving shadow color and the action of light. Possibly this could be taken care of with some sort of post processing. As is the shadows tend to look very black and dead without the subtle bounce lighting effects and subsurface scattering one would see in faces and hands in particular.
 
Thought you had to download stuff to get the really good art, thanks for letting me know.
There's also novelai but their models are limited to fictional things for the most part unless you really know how to prompt. Best results under anime artstyles. Not sure if there's a version that's not paid, either, but for what it can do it may or may not be worth it depending on what kind of cash you have to burn.
 
Thought you had to download stuff to get the really good art, thanks for letting me know.
In a way, you are correct. You can tune the output of your art by using custom models and hypernetworks which have been custom trained.
If you want to use specific models, you will need to download them, and load them locally or in a cloud instance. These models are used to generate specific subsets of art. For example, the most common ones are designed to generate art of a single character from an animation program based on a prompt. The most complex ones can even emulate a certain artists style.

These models are loaded into software which then converts text prompts into your images. You can find more information on this process in a helpful thread in this very forum.

 
There is plenty of good ai art in any manner of styles. There are quite a few sites right now that display ai art with the prompt used to generate it and the tool to use to do so. Check out https://openart.ai for one. Artists really aren't blowing neural nets ability to completely wipe the floor with a lot of human talent, but they are overemphasizing the effect it'll have on the market. Especially for already established artists with well known styles.
My prediction is that it won't matter. It'll be just like sonic recolors or Art tracers where there will be a glut of the samey images over and over, overflowing its algorithm and still churning out rather utter shit.

Let's be honest, most AI works are complete crap made by people spamming the hell out of the machine to make thousands of rather derivative works. You have to keep in mind that most people are lazy and will rather not put in the effort of making any pic look nice and since there is very little oversight, more and more people will just overflow the internet with complete shit. I have seen many accounts being a week old, yet spanning over 9000 posts of the same "sameface mcgee" artwork with deformed limbs and awkward texture placement.

This is why, even though I do not like AI, I am not too worried about AI "taking people's jobs", nor do I participate in these rather retarded "protests". The retards involved are already doing a far better job ruining AI for everyone and there is bound to be oversight once people affect certain bottom lines.
 
My prediction is that it won't matter. It'll be just like sonic recolors or Art tracers where there will be a glut of the samey images over and over, overflowing its algorithm and still churning out rather utter shit.

Let's be honest, most AI works are complete crap made by people spamming the hell out of the machine to make thousands of rather derivative works. You have to keep in mind that most people are lazy and will rather not put in the effort of making any pic look nice and since there is very little oversight, more and more people will just overflow the internet with complete shit. I have seen many accounts being a week old, yet spanning over 9000 posts of the same "sameface mcgee" artwork with deformed limbs and awkward texture placement.

This is why, even though I do not like AI, I am not too worried about AI "taking people's jobs", nor do I participate in these rather retarded "protests". The retards involved are already doing a far better job ruining AI for everyone and there is bound to be oversight once people affect certain bottom lines.
Current ai work ends up samey and crappy if you use the same prompts over and over with the same settings. Future ai work won't have these issues just like the current stuff can clone a variety of art styles where you could barely make one produce clipart on a white background a few years back. This is a constantly improving technology and it isn't appearing to yet slow down in its development. That time will come, but by the time it does we'll have deep learning algorithms that produce full CG scenes. We're already at the point where you can hack stable diffusion to do it for you. Shits mad.
 
Current ai work ends up samey and crappy if you use the same prompts over and over with the same settings. Future ai work won't have these issues just like the current stuff can clone a variety of art styles where you could barely make one produce clipart on a white background a few years back. This is a constantly improving technology and it isn't appearing to yet slow down in its development. That time will come, but by the time it does we'll have deep learning algorithms that produce full CG scenes. We're already at the point where you can hack stable diffusion to do it for you. Shits mad.
Yeah, but the point is, that you need to get the people using it to be smart enough to actually utilize AI as a tool, since as it stands right now, retards would use it as "holy shit! This AI will draw stuff for me!" and will do the laziest way possible in order to either purposefully abuse the system, or to just to have a "portfolio" to show off to facebook friends.

In order for AI to be a great tool for the future, you must have people be smarter in order for this tool to be sustainable. All this is really doing is opening up the floodgates for retards to spam the feeds with garbage.
 
In order for AI to be a great tool for the future, you must have people be smarter in order for this tool to be sustainable. All this is really doing is opening up the floodgates for retards to spam the feeds with garbage.
Have you seen deviantarts what's new tab?

I get what you mean but this is the fad stage. You got the same thing when webcam filters became a thing, when instagram first launched. When Apple released their hideous video emojis. Yes, not all completely applicable, but very similar. That tide will falter and the quality artists will still be there.
 
Sometimes I get in a Mood and play with NightCafe, because free.

That site has no idea what a peppermint plant is, and that amuses me more than it should.
 
r/DefendingAIArt hit 10k AND 11k followers within two days because of all of this lawsuit nonsense.

I just KNOW Crudo, Katria, and Ortiz are seething about it. Amazing stuff.

I've noticed they're pushing the "pro-AI art is a hate group/alt right/Gamergate" rhetoric more and more, they're getting desperate in case the lawsuit doesn't work out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom