ACLU Sues Sec. Devos Over New Guidelines That Bolster Due Process Rights

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Townhall article | https://archive.vn/Qrrmk
ACLU press release | https://archive.li/ttLf2
____

From Townhall
Reagan McCarthy | Posted: May 15, 2020 11:30 AM

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), a nonpartisan interest group that has historically supported individual rights, is suing Education Secretary Betsy DeVos over her new Title IX reforms on college campuses. Just last week, Sec. Devos released the long-awaited reforms to Title IX; her changes represent a complete overhaul of the Obama-era guidelines for Title IX and sexual misconduct cases. The Obama administration’s Title IX policies were biased against the accused, essentially stripping those parties of due process, and created a bogus evidentiary standard for handling sexual assault and rape cases. The previous guidelines paved an avenue for accusers to wrongfully bring claims of sexual misconduct forward, be taken at face value without proper due process, and for the accused to be wrongfully punished.

The ACLU, an organization which claims to champion civil liberties, including due process and free speech, claims that Sec. Devos’s new guidelines for sexual harassment are not strict enough:
“The DeVos standard redefines what constitutes sexual harassment and assault in disturbing ways. It excuses schools from investigating reports of harassment and assault that take place off campus or school grounds, like at unofficial frat houses, at an apartment on the edge of the campus, or during a school’s own study abroad program.”
The organization’s assessment completely misses the mark. Sec. Devos’s reforms to Title IX, with respect to harassment, bring much needed reforms to the Obama-era definition of sexual harassment. President Obama defined sexual harassment as “any unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature,” which allowed any unwanted speech to be deemed sexual harassment. Sec. Devos’s guidelines now mandate that any such conduct must be severely offensive to any reasonable person, which mirrors the Supreme Court’s 1999 ruling on harassment. Sec. Devos's Title IX overhaul also includes sexual assault, dating violence, domestic violence under the definition of sexual harassment, as to codify such misconduct as illegal discrimination on the basis of sex.

The Obama administration’s loose framework led to cases adjudicated on campuses being later overturned in court, and actually undermined the severity of sexual harassment as a crime. Such a loose definition for deeming speech as harassment does a disservice to students who have actually been sexually harassed. Sec. Devos’s new regulation gets it right.

Most egregiously, the ACLU claims that Sec. Devos’s new guidelines create barriers to report sexual misconduct.
“Sexual harassment and assault have no place in our schools. Federal law imposes obligations on schools to make sure that’s the case. Students shouldn’t have to jump through hoops just to report abuse, and schools should not be allowed to ignore claims of discrimination on the basis of sex when they would have to respond to claims of discrimination on other protected grounds.”
A basic understanding of the new regulations directly refutes the ACLU’s sanctimonious claim. Nowhere in the new guidelines does Sec. Devos’s ED allow for any such discrimination on the basis of sex, and as Sec. Devos has said repeatedly, sexual misconduct in any form has no place on college campuses.
"This new regulation requires schools to act in meaningful ways to support survivors of sexual misconduct, without sacrificing important safeguards to ensure a fair and transparent process. We can and must continue to fight sexual misconduct in our nation's schools, and this rule makes certain that fight continues," Sec. Devos said in an earlier release.
The organization refers to Sec. Devos’s mandate that students report a claim to a Title IX official on campus, rather than any instructor or administrator. After this, if the student wishes, the process, and possible adjudication, will move forward. Such a procedure hardly constitutes a “hoop” to jump through.

The ACLU was once one of the most powerful organizations supporting civil liberties, but is now arguing against stronger protections for due process. Sec. Devos’s overhaul ensures that proper justice is carried out for both parties, and that basic civil liberties, including due process, are not compromised when institutions adjudicate these cases. Protecting basic agency for the accused under Title IX is not mutually exclusive with fair adjudication, nor do such protections impede on rights of the accuser. Sec. Devos's guidelines ensure that institutions practice judicial impartiality without compromising due process or free speech.
____

Other coverage:
Washington Examiner, The Hill, NBC News, Commentary Mag,
 

Attachments

I swear I saw a story today about a disturbingly high number of universities having like a 2:1 ratio of "administrators" to "staff", which means "Critical Theory assholes that spun their basket-weaving degree into unearned positions of power" vs "people that actually teach classes."
This is why tuition is so expensive.
 
This is why tuition is so expensive.
Paradox of subsidies. Boomers had a great time in college, thought everyone should go, and threw god knows how much money at the system to make that happen... only for the system to absorb the money, raise prices, and make college both worse and less affordable. Basically a microcosm of everything the boomer generation ever tried.
 
One of the silver linings I'm looking forward to possibly getting out of corona is a MASSIVE downsizing of the bloat that infests universities as who knows how much of the Bursar's money just went "poof" along with everyone else's?

And if they think they're gonna get a bailout from Trump after years of being TDS Boot Camp? Hooooooo boy.............
 
Last edited:
nonpartisan interest group that has historically supported individual rights
lol.

The ACLU, an organization which claims to champion civil liberties, including due process and free speech, claims that Sec. Devos’s new guidelines for sexual harassment are not strict enough
“Sexual harassment and assault have no place in our schools. Federal law imposes obligations on schools to make sure that’s the case. Students shouldn’t have to jump through hoops just to report abuse, and schools should not be allowed to ignore claims of discrimination on the basis of sex when they would have to respond to claims of discrimination on other protected grounds.”
Totally not overreaching and hysterically reacting like the pearl-clutching faggots they are tho, we should totally listen to what these dumbasses are saying, even though they've done absolutely nothing of note ever.
 
" Sexual harassment and assault have no place in our schools. Federal law imposes obligations on schools to make sure that’s the case. "

Funny, I seem to recall that it's also Federal Law, by way of the 5th Amendment, that I have a right to fair trial.... and being denied the ability to confront my accusers and be fairly represented seems like the kind of thing that should also have "no place" in a school, much less the country at large. It's funny how that enshrined right that is the bedrock of law in our nation has suddenly been reduced to an unnecessary "hoop" to jump through in the eyes of the powerful and "correct" thinking, isn't it? Anyone holding their fellow man to that level of contempt, not even worth his basic rights, has no job telling anyone what is just. What "has no place".
 
Last edited:
I normally like the ACLU but Title IX is bullshit

What has the ACLU done in the last decade that isn't terrible?

I agree, they used to be a worthwhile organization. I might be on the wrong side of the political aisle for them, but they occasionally fought the good fight. Now? Only by accident, and rarely at that.
 
What has the ACLU done in the last decade that isn't terrible?

I agree, they used to be a worthwhile organization. I might be on the wrong side of the political aisle for them, but they occasionally fought the good fight. Now? Only by accident, and rarely at that.

ACLU defended free speech against groups like Antifa.
 
What has the ACLU done in the last decade that isn't terrible?

I agree, they used to be a worthwhile organization. I might be on the wrong side of the political aisle for them, but they occasionally fought the good fight. Now? Only by accident, and rarely at that.

Throw the WHO and SPLC in there too.
 
ACLU defended free speech against groups like Antifa.

In the most pansy-ass ways they could manage, in between condemning the police for using appropriate force against them, revising their standards incrementally to slowly edge out groups they have previously upheld, and being amazingly silent on calls for censorship and suppression that fifteen or twenty years ago they would have been the first and loudest to condemn.

No. The ACLU (And the SPLC, like TowinKarz said) has more or less completely sold out to one side of the political narrative.
 
Back
Top Bottom