Opinion About MAGA Inc. - Or how to get yourself disinvited from political cocktail parties.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

About MAGA Inc.​

Am I working for Gov. Ron DeSantis out of a bunker in Florida? No. I live in Ohio and don’t work for or take money from any campaign or candidate. But I was approached by Alex Bruesewitz, a GOP consultant allied with Donald Trump, to join the Mar-a-Lago circle jerk. “Would love to connect on a project I’m working on for 2024,” he wrote me last August over Twitter. “I’m thinking you could be helpful on the messaging aspect.”

Why am I abusing you with this information? I recently wrote about why I didn’t join Trump’s circus. Now, I want to bring to your attention how the circus works, or what I’ve come to call MAGA Inc., which is essentially the new version of “Conservatism Inc.” But instead of guys like Frank Luntz, who share bunk beds with Kevin McCarthy, you get characters like Bruesewitz.

More importantly, I oppose MAGA Inc. for the same reasons I oppose Conservatism Inc. That is, it exists for no purpose other than to deceive Republican voters, and it cannot combat the left. They’re different sides of the same coin. One is just less honest about what it is.

From my little peek under the hood, I’ve found that direct money doesn’t have to be exchanged. When it is, it doesn’t have to be much. These people are cheap dates. Federal Election Commission filings show it cost $35,000 for Bruesewitz to initially switch from pro-DeSantis to anti-DeSantis.
There are other incentives, like having access to Trump (which by itself can be lucrative for consultants who can, in turn, offer it to others for a fee), having Trump promote whatever you’re selling, having access to the Mar-a-Lago social club, and, yes, the possibility of a job in the White House because ass-kissing is the only qualification you need for a job.

Bruesewitz is reportedly considering a run for office in Wisconsin, so I suppose he believes branding himself as a “MAGA Warrior” would help him get Trump’s endorsement, even though that doesn’t go far nowadays. I don’t have a problem with people doing what they have to do to eat. But these people do it by shitting in other people’s bowls.

I don’t know what I would have received for joining the party. Maybe a signed hat from The Donald himself. Who knows. But if you want to see what MAGA Inc. looks like in action, see the response to my thread about Donald Trump Jr.’s position on transgenderism.

In a podcast released earlier this month, Trump Jr. called gender affirmation “bullshit,” said he rejects the idea of transgenderism being pushed on “kids” but then concluded that he does not mind it for adults. His words:
I don’t give a shit, dude. If you’re an adult and you wanna be trans and you do it—great! If you’re happy, you’re productive. I actually don’t give a shit. I’m fairly liberal on the issue.
Being “liberal on the issue” is how you get Dylvan Mulvaney, who likes to dress as a six-year-old girl, when not knocking back cans of Bud Light while wearing pearls.

Incoherence is a feature—not a bug—of MAGA Inc. Trump Jr. accepts the fundamental premise that men can snap their fingers and become women with genital mutilation and hormones or women’s clothing and a tuck like Buffalo Bill in “The Silence of the Lambs.” But don’t push it on three-year-old kids. That’s the line in the sand between civilization and barbarism.

It’s worth noting Trump père feels the same way, and it’s largely thanks to Trump that the “conservative” celebrity of Jenner has cursed us (Jenner recently joined Bruesewitz in his attacks on actual conservatives). I have documented how people from Trump’s White House and campaign were critical to forming the Jenner gubernatorial candidacy in California. A non-profit funded by Paul Singer was involved, but they don’t like to talk about that.

Back on the hellscape that is Twitter, I highlighted that if, like the Trump family, you believe adults can “consent” to transgenderism, you’ve already accepted the premise that proposes children can, too. You’ve already uprooted reality, eviscerated the natural order of things, and there’s no reason why it cannot also apply to “kids,” however arbitrarily defined. Trump Jr. said he is against pushing transgenderism on three-year-olds. I agree. But my son turns four next year, so would it be more acceptable then? Oregon might allow 15-year-olds to get a sex-change operation on their own. Would it be less troubling at that age? Audrey “Aiden” Hale, the “trans man” (a woman who “consented” to becoming a man) killer of three children and three adults, was 28. These are tough questions, I know.

After I posted that thread with these thoughts, I was told the Trump camp called for people to attack me on Twitter, which I found amusing. The astroturfed “backlash” was illustrative of how inorganic the MAGA Inc. game is in practice. Twitter is their domain, where influencers can be used to shape narratives. But that’s not reflected in reality or even other social media platforms. Trump Jr. struggles to get people to agree with his DeSantis bashing on Instagram for the same reason Trump Sr. can’t get audiences at rallies to go along with it: there’s no horde of influencers to carry the laugh track.

To be clear, the problem is not criticisms of DeSantis. Every politician should be subject to scrutiny. The real problem is people who claim to have the best interests of Middle Americans at heart but don’t. Moreover, not everyone in this sphere is fake, and I appreciate the independent few.

But too many are, despite all their chest-thumping about fighting the D.C. swamp, beholden to the swamp in Mar-a-Lago in one way or another. I don’t envy them. They’re charged with keeping alive the spirit of Trump 2016 like it’s “Weekend at Bernie’s,” violently slamming chest compressions into a body that’s bled out while trying to make it dance for bystanders. You wonder if the decent thing would be to bury it and move on. But they can’t. That corpse is their meal ticket.

These people know that without Trump, they would lose a climbing ladder, so they’ll fight tooth and nail, even going at it with other Trump supporters, like Michael Caputo, who worked at Trump’s Health and Human Services; Jenna Ellis, a lawyer who served on Trump’s legal team; and Katrina Pierson, the national spokesperson for Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and senior adviser to the 2020 campaign. All these people have butted heads with Bruesewitz and the army of clowns swirling around MAGA Inc.

Some of this seems like unnecessary drama, and, indeed, this is the last time I will write about it for a good while. However, the left keeps winning, our political swamps remain placid and undrained, and we are consigned to conserving yesterday’s revolution against civilization precisely because these people are leading us. MAGA Inc. is just a vulgar version of Conservatism Inc. and just as ill-equipped to do what must be done.

Note: images not loading properly, refer to article link or archive to see images
 
Lmao how is "Trump Inc." worse than the uniparty neocons? "Oh no, they're organizing!" Kill yourself.
Back on the hellscape that is Twitter, I highlighted that if, like the Trump family, you believe adults can “consent” to transgenderism, you’ve already accepted the premise that proposes children can, too.
"If you believe adults can 'consent' to sex, you've already accepted the premise that proposes children can, too." I dunno, that doesn't seem to follow.

You want to talk "astroturfed?" This guy is a plant, and this is all intentional F.U.D.
 
There is some truth on this. Many so called "conservatives" are just liberals. The whole "as long as you don't hurt others" is a 100% liberal shtick. There is a big difference between opposing something because it's forced and opposing it because it's wrong.

The problem seems to be that people are assuming that being opposed to tranny degeneracy makes you a conservatives by default. Wrong. Many communists oppose this too and they aren't conservatives, obviously. A lot of people jumping to participate in politics do so out of good faith, but without properly understanding the definitions of the things they either support or oppose. If they want to fight troons and groomers, you can do it under a liberal flag. It's not conservatives' fault that liberalism now is associated with degeneracy.

In the same way, you can be a liberal who has some conservative views and vice versa. People's politics aren't always so white and black.

"If you believe adults can 'consent' to sex, you've already accepted the premise that proposes children can, too." I dunno, that doesn't seem to follow.
No, what he's saying is that if you accept that adults can change their sex, then you're accepting that minors can do it and the only thing that stops them from doing it is their age. There is no point if we're fighting for a 17 years old kid to not chop off parts of their body, and they she or he turns 18 and does it.

Believing that you can change your sex or "gender" is either right or wrong. If you believe that adults can do it, then there will be always a excuse for when a minor does it, because you're talking about a true statement: "some people are born in the wrong body and that need to be fixed".

The truth is that thinking you can hack off parts of your body to fix it is whack medicine and nobody should do it, adult or not.
 
No, what he's saying is that if you accept that adults can change their sex, then you're accepting that minors can do it and the only thing that stops them from doing it is their age. There is no point if we're fighting for a 17 years old kid to not chop off parts of their body, and they she or he turns 18 and does it.

Believing that you can change your sex or "gender" is either right or wrong. If you believe that adults can do it, then there will be always a excuse for when a minor does it, because you're talking about a true statement: "some people are born in the wrong body and that need to be fixed".

The truth is that thinking you can hack off parts of your body to fix it is whack medicine and nobody should do it, adult or not.
Smoking is 100% detrimental to your health. Adults are free to do it if they want to. Minors are not free to do it, and they should not.

The distinction is between what adults can do versus what kids can do, not a question of if being a tranny is ever "legitimate." I don't know, and I don't care. I don't give a fuck about adult troons or pooners. Just don't let kids do it.
 
Smoking is 100% detrimental to your health. Adults are free to do it if they want to. Minors are not free to do it, and they should not.

The distinction is between what adults can do versus what kids can do, not a question of if being a tranny is ever "legitimate." I don't know, and I don't care. I don't give a fuck about adult troons or pooners. Just don't let kids do it.
It's not the same.

If you can say that adults can cut up and poison their bodies for the sake of "alleviating their gender dysphoria", then why shouldn't kids be allowed to do the same-- especially when the opportunity is there to do it before they go through any pubertal changes that would "cause them dysphoria"? Why is it okay to make a "trans kid" suffer with dysphoria until they're 18, at exactly which point it's magically okay for them to undergo these procedures-- and when most of their pubertal changes have set in, logically leaving them with several sources of dysphoria?

By the logic of transgender ideology, those who express gender dysphoria should be transitioned ASAP in the same way that you don't wait and see if you should de-fibrillate someone who you've already confirmed is fibrillating. You won't allege that you smoke for your health, in contrast.

Just because you don't think that this is a matter of transgenderism being legitimate, doesn't mean that's not what's being argued when the ideology is advanced and debated.
 
This guy does sound like one of the few DeSantis people who are not retarded. I agree with some points but not others. I think part of the issue is Trump is not the massive reactionary many people both for and against him think. In a sane world he would be a regular american centrist, a 1980's liberal pretty much.

There is some truth on this. Many so called "conservatives" are just liberals. The whole "as long as you don't hurt others" is a 100% liberal shtick. There is a big difference between opposing something because it's forced and opposing it because it's wrong.

This is part of the long, long con by communists and progressives to destroy the American project and implement their own Utopia. Freedom is incompatible with Equality on principle, because if people are free they will end up unequal. America was founded on the basis of freedom and with Liberal values of it in mind.

However starting in the 1920's and to the 1950's the commies, with the help of the Comintern in many cases, started pushing to conflate "liberal" with "left" and "conservative" with "right" as part of the plans to the revolution in the USA. It is how they manipulated the current status of things like this, where in a sane world Trump would just be a liberal right winger not a "conservative".

Then you also have the fact that people like Trump Jr. and other more mainstream people do not realize they are fighting a Total War and think this is a regular political battle. The people pushing for grooming kids into trans shit are not doing it out of any real love of "trans people", transsexuals mean fuck all. This is just a vehicle for the delivery of cultural marxism and identity politics. They used black people and civil rights first, then gays, now trannies, and in the future they will use pedos and zoophiles and whatever is needed.

The point isn't "being accepted", if that was the goal none of this shit would be happening. The goal is to destroy Freedom to implement Equality in it's place. That is why you get shit like "white supremacist blacks" or "homophobic gays" and why they will go mental and call Clarence Thomas a nigger and demand that J.K. Rowling suck the tranny dick.

Tl;Dr the problem is communist are not honest, and you should not assume they ever argue in good faith and instead ALWAYS be on the defensive. Always assume they are grifting, always assume their grievances are just power plays, never think they will negotiate.
 
It's not the same.

If you can say that adults can cut up and poison their bodies for the sake of "alleviating their gender dysphoria", then why shouldn't kids be allowed to do the same-- especially when the opportunity is there to do it before they go through any pubertal changes that would "cause them dysphoria"? Why is it okay to make a "trans kid" suffer with dysphoria until they're 18, at exactly which point it's magically okay for them to undergo these procedures-- and when most of their pubertal changes have set in, logically leaving them with several sources of dysphoria?

By the logic of transgender ideology, those who express gender dysphoria should be transitioned ASAP in the same way that you don't wait and see if you should de-fibrillate someone who you've already confirmed is fibrillating. You won't allege that you smoke for your health, in contrast.

Just because you don't think that this is a matter of transgenderism being legitimate, doesn't mean that's not what's being argued when the ideology is advanced and debated.
Nah, it doesn't work. The totality of the data--the real data--leaves no question that the overwhelming majority of kids who claim to have gender dysphoria cannot be legitimately trans (let's assume, for the sake of the discussion, there might be an actual mental disorder called "trans" in some people) and will desist in adulthood, a large percentage of the time merely turning out gay or lesbian. The data further show that trooning out with surgery and/or medication causes permanent changes that cannot be reversed including normal developmental changes that coincide with puberty (Anyone who denies this is lying.) That being a medicalized tranny makes you not just sterile but anorgasmic as an adult (almost 100% of the time). That you live a shorter, more painful, far more medically troubled, and more expensive life. (In short, that not being trans is objectively a better life than being trans.) That your potential dating pool as a tranny goes down, not up (even considering coomer degenerates who like troons). That rates of depression and suicidal ideation do not go down after surgery and medication (when you control for the temporary depression-dampening effects of testosterone). And that "only socially transitioned" children almost always leads into actual medicalization.

There is no fact-based argument for ever trooning out minors. All the evidence shows it's a fucking disaster, despite how happy Munchie Mom might be that little Brayden looks so delightfully androgynous in his dress because she butchered him into a eunuch before he even hit puberty. It's 100% child abuse.

But adults can choose their own way through the world. We do not stop adults from choosing to do things we know are objectively bad for them because taking away someone's agency because we know better than they do is a much more evil act than "allowing" adults to make mistakes. Are adult troons well adjusted people? No, they aren't, generally. Is transfaggery a good idea? Almost never. Is it my place to stop a grown-ass man from wearing a dress, getting revolting plastic surgery if he wants to, and mincing about in pumps? Only if he's infringing on someone else's rights, or only in the sense I'm definitely going to make fun of him until he feels too ashamed to do it in front of everyone else or kills himself. Otherwise, his life is his own to fuck up. That's why so many vices are restricted by law to children but not to adults.

And yeah, "according to trans ideology" blah blah blah. Delusional cultists believe whatever they want to believe. I don't care what they think. It's time for the adults in the room to stand up and tell these freaks to fuck off back to their creepy online fetish forums and to never, ever try to transgress against children again. I am not the keeper of random adults who happen to be around me on earth, but any decent person has to stand up against this stuff when it affects kids. Tell the truth about this shit constantly, and never back down an inch from Benny Hill sketch characters.
 
Nah, it doesn't work. The totality of the data--the real data--leaves no question that the overwhelming majority of kids who claim to have gender dysphoria cannot be legitimately trans (let's assume, for the sake of the discussion, there might be an actual mental disorder called "trans" in some people) and will desist in adulthood, a large percentage of the time merely turning out gay or lesbian. The data further show that trooning out with surgery and/or medication causes permanent changes that cannot be reversed including normal developmental changes that coincide with puberty (Anyone who denies this is lying.) That being a medicalized tranny makes you not just sterile but anorgasmic as an adult (almost 100% of the time). That you live a shorter, more painful, far more medically troubled, and more expensive life. (In short, that not being trans is objectively a better life than being trans.) That your potential dating pool as a tranny goes down, not up (even considering coomer degenerates who like troons). That rates of depression and suicidal ideation do not go down after surgery and medication (when you control for the temporary depression-dampening effects of testosterone). And that "only socially transitioned" children almost always leads into actual medicalization.

There is no fact-based argument for ever trooning out minors.
There's no actual medical argument for trooning out anyone. Everything you've mentioned isn't exclusive to children.

But, the people pushing the ideology want you to believe that SRS and HRT saves lives. That's the foundation of their advance. And in that context, it makes no sense to allow "life-saving medical treatment" for adults but bar it from children who are "no less in danger". When people seek these things, they're not doing it for the hell of it-- they're doing it ostensibly to ameliorate a mental issue. That's how it's marketed and discussed. As superficial as the process to get access to these operations are, that's why it exists. It's those arguments currently being dealt with in society, not the matter of letting anyone do whatever they want.

So if it turns out that kids shouldn't do it... then they soon find that they have no argument for why adults should do it.

Furthermore, "adults should be able to do whatever they want" isn't even valid here-- no legitimate doctor will ever sign off on an amputation of a healthy limb just because you feel as though you shouldn't have it, in the same way no mental health professional will abide anorexia because of the sufferer's own delusions. That's not even someone choosing their own life path, in the first place-- they're already involving a third party.
 
America was founded on the basis of freedom and with Liberal values of it in mind.
I agree with what you said, but I think this is the most important part. United States IS a liberal country, and by liberal I mean "classical liberal" values. Whether is good or not it's up to debate, but that's the foundation of the United States of America. You can have conservative politicians, but most people would disagree with actual conservative values.

Some countries just can't be conservative. Locally, Argentina and Chile, for example, are never going to abandon their liberal values. Peru and Bolivia, otoh, are very rejecting of liberalism and embrace conservatism. It's laughable when people try to give us liberalism because most people simply don't align with the ideas.

Furthermore, "adults should be able to do whatever they want" isn't even valid here-- no legitimate doctor will ever sign off on an amputation of a healthy limb just because you feel as though you shouldn't have it, in the same way no mental health professional will abide anorexia because of the sufferer's own delusions. That's not even someone choosing their own life path, in the first place-- they're already involving a third party.
Unfortunately, some doctors do perform amputations of free limbs that patients require. I dunno what's the legislation for such a thing in US, but I'm sure someone can always say "it's my body and I can do whatever I want with it." Here is the main difference between conservatism and liberalism about it: a liberal would tell you "yes, it's their body, you can't stop them", while a conservative would tell you "yes, maybe it's legally allowed, but it is wrong and should not happen".

That's how you can tell liberals from conservatives apart about this specific discussion. A liberal will tell you an adult transgender is only doing it to themselves (debatable), a conservative will tell you that just because you can, doesn't mean you should. I've seen this discussion before: promotion of whack medicine ends up creating a market, something liberals will defend to the very end. Most -if not all- doctors performing surgeries in both adults and children are private. When conservatives want to stop this lunacy, liberals see this market (both clients and providers) under attack.
 
Another Pedro Gonzalez "I am the truest scotsman ever" rant, the pudgy penedjo is being paid more to be anti-Trump than he would have gotten to be pro-Trump. It's getting pathetic, he's got TDS even worse some liberals because it always comes back to something Trump didn't do in office that *Charlie Kelly stringboard meme* now means we're all going to die unless Meatball Ron gets elected.
 
Late 18th century liberal is in no way shape or form remotely related to a 21st century liberal. The only thing they have in common is name, their views are worlds apart.
Yes, that is part of my point. It used to be that Liberal meant a similar thing fromthe late 18th century until the early 20th. Then commies started to hijack the fuck out of it, partially because that fits a marxist view of the "march of history towards socialism"
 
Late 18th century liberal is in no way shape or form remotely related to a 21st century liberal. The only thing they have in common is name, their views are worlds apart.
Only because "cancel culture" to a late 18th century liberal meant sending you to a guillotine as opposed to getting you fired from your job. Outside of the few absolute monarchists/uber-traditionalists out there, all political traditions from communism to fascism are descendents of some flavor of liberalism because conservatism in the West died in the 1830s. That's when the Légitimistes were overthrown in France and when the British Conservative Party (who basically defined "conservatism" at the time) was started from those convinced conservatism could only survive with "reform" so joined with the conservative wing of the Liberal Party.
 
Back
Top Bottom