A brilliant response to racist propaganda

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Original (Archive)

Professor William Darity is known for his extensive work studying American economic history and advocating for Black reparations. As a Duke University Samuel DuBois Cook Distinguished Professor of Public Policy, he has also pushed for a robust federal job guarantee economic plan. This approach has found favor in the broader public over the past decade.

In May, Darity appeared as the University of Massachusetts Amherst’s 2023 Philip Gamble Memorial guest lecturer. His full lecture, titled “Does everyone lose from racism? Insights from stratification economics,” is worth the watch (down below). During the question and answer section of the lecture, a young man spewed what many would consider a right-wing, neo-libertarian talking point about Black “trends” of “higher crime rates” and “high illegitimacy rates” that would supersede any structural criticism of our country.

Professor Darity deftly dismantled this fact-free “propagandistic method” and asked what exactly “crime” meant to this young man, noting that if it means a “history of violence,” then there is “unquestionably” only one group of Americans who, far and away, have participated in general and racially focused violence at levels unmatched by other groups of Americans.

We speak with University of California-Berkeley law professor Ian Haney López, a bona fide, real-life critical race theorist. Not one of those fake ones conservatives are hyperventilating about wherever Black people might exist, like in schools and public libraries.
 
We speak with University of California-Berkeley law professor Ian Haney López, a bona fide, real-life critical race theorist. Not one of those fake ones conservatives are hyperventilating about wherever Black people might exist, like in schools and public libraries.
I can't imagine the level of stupidity it must take to say that as a positive thing with a straight face

Professor Darity deftly dismantled this fact-free “propagandistic method” and asked what exactly “crime” meant to this young man, noting that if it means a “history of violence,” then there is “unquestionably” only one group of Americans who, far and away, have participated in general and racially focused violence at levels unmatched by other groups of Americans.
Nobody kills blacks more often or in greater number than other blacks. and fucking lol at trying to justify this nonsense by bringing up something that happened a handful of times in the fucking reconstruction era. No data that proves this idiots point more recent than 150 years then huh
 
Professor Darity deftly dismantled this fact-free “propagandistic method” and asked what exactly “crime” meant to this young man, noting that if it means a “history of violence,” then there is “unquestionably” only one group of Americans who, far and away, have participated in general and racially focused violence at levels unmatched by other groups of Americans.
Routine university level fart-huffing where they say nothing but get labeled as "brilliant."

The only reason white people can bear the weight of all the perceived history of violence, is because they had the temerity of having a written language and writing shit down; as well as the method to record such deeds was simple enough for any literate to pull out pen and paper and record. That and the notion of the Noble Savage has been ingrained into people for some reason; where everything was sunshine and rainbows, then whitey showed up and immediately turned every non-white into a child-sacrificing, scalping, cannibal.
 
Isn't it more racist to treat minorities as infantile creatures that cannot be held to the same standard of responsibilities and expectations of other ethnicities?
 
noting that if it means a “history of violence,” then there is “unquestionably” only one group of Americans who, far and away, have participated in general and racially focused violence at levels unmatched by other groups of Americans.
Do you know why we bring up black-on-black crime rates, statistical jail sentencing, crime ridden ghettos and cultural attitudes towards the acceptability and the proliferation of crime? We're not racist, we don't hate black people, these are mitigating factors that are not present in any other financially successful and law abiding communities based on race. The problem areas are being pointed out so we can talk about them, come up with solutions and implement them to fix the problem because, as citizens of this country, we both do not like to see Americans suffer and do not want to suffer the consequences in turn.

People like this guy are content to see these people suffer endlessly, if they were plumbers they would be content to collect a paycheck for yelling about how the pipe-making company is bad instead of getting some ABS and fixing the fucking leaks.
 
Isn't it more racist to treat minorities as infantile creatures that cannot be held to the same standard of responsibilities and expectations of other ethnicities?
Depends on who you're asking.

Your modern progressive is stuck with White Man's Burden, and with it the misbelief that all it takes is a little money and education and they'll turn bix nood into the Queen's vernacular.

Your modern jogger doesn't care as long as it means he can steal, rob, and menace without his victim defending themselves or someone calling the popo. In fact, calling the cops is racist, why can't you just be a good little victim.

Neither want a real solution; because it might mean the progressive is wrong and their ego is so fragile they couldn't handle it, and the jogger wants to be of a higher caste where they can menace without retribution.

As hard as I come off here, I'm not completely without sympathy. But it's all the lying and deception that makes up the majority of the "civilized conversation" that makes me want to gun them all down in Minecraft. You can't have a real solution based on lies, so either admit the problem, because what sympathy I do have is dwindling to no recoverable levels.
 
Professor Darity deftly dismantled this fact-free “propagandistic method” and asked what exactly “crime” meant to this young man, noting that if it means a “history of violence,” ...
I watched the actual video. After Darity gives his speech about "history of violence", the person who asked the question is about to follow up (perhaps by stating that no, he did not mean centuries old "history of violence" when talking about crime), but he is immediately cut off and told they need to move on. A true sign of a brilliant response, impervious to criticism.

Also, the link that says "fact-free" is broken, but it seems to be a report on births in the U.S. in 2021. How is that even relevant?
 
in what world is this a brilliant answer?

He just reframed the question to fit his narrative. Politicians do this all the time.
 
Ironically, their pushes for anti-racism is actually making people even more racist. Though that may actually be a feature since the elites are scared of another OWS or Jan 6. Gotta keep the goyim divided!
 
Professor Darity deftly dismantled this fact-free “propagandistic method” and asked what exactly “crime” meant to this young man, noting that if it means a “history of violence,” then there is “unquestionably” only one group of Americans who, far and away, have participated in general and racially focused violence at levels unmatched by other groups of Americans.
Yeah, niggers, they make up majority of interracial violence against all groups.
 
in what world is this a brilliant answer?

He just reframed the question to fit his narrative. Politicians do this all the time.
In the progressive world; you're either a simple brain who's amazed at the educated big brains (Black Science Man and the IFL Science types). In fact this isn't really progressive as much as it could probably be most of society, especially what you would call a far huffer; one of the biggest "complaints" about George Bush 2 and Trump were their low grade level speaking levels. People trying to engage in class warfare about how they're only able to speak to their low-IQ voter base; nevermind in a number of technical fields, translating your big brain bullshit into common speak is seen as a valuable skill. Or God forbid the old adage of if you can't explain it / teach it, you don't really know it.

But back on track, this is fart huffing big brain mentality; where being able to articulate a point really isn't seen as right or valuable. You give a little quip or a five second sound bite for the fanbase caste to lavish you with praise. Especially when you use it to shut down an ideological other; free speech is violence, that's why Nazis like free speech, ergo you shouldn't give free speech to Nazis. Who's a Nazi? EVERYONE!

One last bit about politicians reframing shit; people liked Obama because he was articulate (allegedly), while Bush 2 and Trump were 8th grade level white trash. I don't care how you voted or who you like more; but consider the narrative about people's speaking skill being a metric to gauge how good/smart they are. Not saying Bush or Trump are 8th Dimension Underwater Go masters, but neither was Obama, and the "educated" would want him to be elected President of the Universe.

Education's a fucking lie, and the new religion, and as the old religion, we need to purge the heretics.
 
Last edited:
It's a good thing they told me this was a brilliant response to racist propaganda because otherwise I would have thought it was a bunch of condescending, pseudointellectual bullshit poorly masquerading as academic discourse, which is what it looks like. You know an argument is really up to snuff when they have to tell it is.
 
Nothing says brilliant than ranting about the definition of a word, obviously using it as a filibuster, and then bitching when the guy tried to clarify on a question your dumbass didn't even answer.

You owe the guy for wasting his time. As does this journoscum.
 
in what world is this a brilliant answer?

He just reframed the question to fit his narrative. Politicians do this all the time.
Every time I see an article that hails something as "brilliant", I immediately assume that whatever follows will be shit covered shit with shit topping.
 
Presented without further comment
gdpiq.jpg
 
It's a good thing they told me this was a brilliant response to racist propaganda because otherwise I would have thought it was a bunch of condescending, pseudointellectual bullshit
CRT merchants are emperors without clothes.
 
During the question and answer section of the lecture, a young man spewed what many would consider a right-wing, neo-libertarian talking point about Black “trends” of “higher crime rates” and “high illegitimacy rates” that would supersede any structural criticism of our country.

Professor Darity deftly dismantled this fact-free “propagandistic method” and asked what exactly “crime” meant to this young man, noting that if it means a “history of violence,” then there is “unquestionably” only one group of Americans who, far and away, have participated in general and racially focused violence at levels unmatched by other groups of Americans.
According to the FBI, blacks effectively murder each other (annually) at rates just below the total number of blacks lynched during the 'Jim Crow' Era.

Blacks are a bigger menace to each other (and some will admit this when other blacks aren't around) than whitey could hope to be. And those are just the blacks on the street. The ones who have been (((educated))) and accepted into the Cathedral, like William Darity, poison the minds of black people, telling them that they simultaneously stand below whites economically, but above whites morally and culturally.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom