58 papers published disputing anthropogenic global warming so far in 2017 - Cult of climate "science" btfo; abandon your false Gods Bill Nye and Al Gore

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
A lot of these articles are applied to regional weather, not global, and deal with predictions going way further back than 1800. The While a meta-analysis of these data would make an interesting global climate map of the middle ages, I’m not seeing any smoking gun that disproves the current model of increased global temperatures correlating with increased atmospheric CO2.

So, the answers to the above are: a) mostly, yes. and b) hell no.
 
Feline Darkmage said:
Are the papers
A) Peer reviewed
and
B) Actually saying what Breitbart says they say?
Click to expand...

I didn't trace the original papers, but what they say is basically that temperatures have been higher during the past 1000 years or so, at least in some part of the world. None of them says that the current bout of temperature rise cannot be due to anthropogenic causes.
 
I want to actually see these papers... Not the articles about them.
 
Male Idiot said:
There is no reason to not believe that the Earth's climate was not changing on its before humans did stuff.

After all, ice ages and that happened and I heard a lot we are in between two ice ages, so the heat is going up. This does not mean that human made gases have no impact.
Click to expand...

The climate has changed before yes, but the rate of change in the last 100 years is a lot faster than at any point of the Earth's history. Ice ages and climate shifts usually occur over millions of years with gradual shifts depending on the composition of the atmosphere.

There is a debate on the extent of our effect on the climate (i.e. are humans the main cause, a contributing factor, or a trigger that set off a positive feedback loop) but theres no debate on whether or not the climate is changing and if humans play a role. We as a species have colonized every habitat on the planet, outnumber every other species besides cockroaches and dandelions, changed the dynamics of entire ecosystems, and changed the face of the planet in just 20,000 of Earth's 4,500,000,000 years of existence, to think that this won't have an effect on the larger dynamics of the planet is just intellectually dishonest.
 
What's your deal with climate change? Even if it were a hoax, who does cleaning up pollution hurt, exactly? Some poor multimillion dollar corporation?
 
melty said:
What's your deal with climate change? Even if it were a hoax, who does cleaning up pollution hurt, exactly? Some poor multimillion dollar corporation?
Click to expand...

That's the exact issue. People want to dump waste everywhere and pollute the environment all while raking in billions and going "climate change is a hoax bro." I guess they're hoping that we're all so dumb that every time somebody wants to dump toxins or increase carbon emissions that we won't care because climate change doesn't real. It's all about money. Nothing else. For the love of the almighty dollar.
 
link the actual papers, not the right-wing equivalent of buzzfeed/huffpo, my dude.
 
Dysnomia said:
That's the exact issue. People want to dump waste everywhere and pollute the environment all while raking in billions and going "climate change is a hoax bro." I guess they're hoping that we're all so dumb that every time somebody wants to dump toxins or increase carbon emissions that we won't care because climate change doesn't real. It's all about money. Nothing else. For the love of the almighty dollar.
Click to expand...

It's not like there have ever been corporate sponsored "studies" proving all kinds of shit, like for instance that smoking didn't cause cancer and was actually good for you.
 
melty said:
What's your deal with climate change? Even if it were a hoax, who does cleaning up pollution hurt, exactly? Some poor multimillion dollar corporation?
Click to expand...
Nobody's saying not to clean up pollution, clean air and water are great. Climate change is supposedly caused by CO2, which is the opposite of pollution, it makes plants grow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom