Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How has this held up? I know a critique of PETG in the 3D2A community is flex which is why PLA seems to be the go-to. I've tested some non-standard materials like resins (Formlabs Tough 2000) and it can hold up in the short term, but I haven't done long term testing and I know resins are notorious for being brittle.Printed a rifle stock and foregrip for my pistol, used PETG. Really fun to play around with what I suppose is now technically a Margolin carbine, especially once I managed to put a red dot sight on it.
Just fine, but it's only been two months and the pistol isn't particularly powerful (it's a .21LR competition pistol).How has this held up? I know a critique of PETG in the 3D2A community is flex which is why PLA seems to be the go-to. I've tested some non-standard materials like resins (Formlabs Tough 2000) and it can hold up in the short term, but I haven't done long term testing and I know resins are notorious for being brittle.
Actually Im doing that right now. just ordered all the parts for the pulltruder m1 off amazon.I did think about doing it but as most bottles only give a few grams of filament and you need to clean off glue with acetone, clean out the insides and reshape with a heatgun. I couldn't see it as being worthwhile to invest all the time/materials to do it. Like this guy uses 3kg of filament and an ender 3 to make a machine. It runs his for 2hrs and makes 30g of recycled filament from a 5l bottle, he would need to run the machine for 200hrs+ and recycle 100+ 5l bottles to even just get the original investment back. Unless you want to make it a daily ritual to recycle a bottle in that way I can't see the point, just spend the money you would have spent on acetone and parts to buy actual filament.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=1yIe1Pp_Nrg
They're like NVIDIA of the 3D world in that if you talk shit, they'll go out of the way to blacklist you AFAIK. It's TBTF for China now I think.Internet bambulab shills
I believe them. Not because I don't think there's shills: 3d printing has tons of them, most involve chinese brands playing dirty and you always see them come out whenever some safety hazard is discovered with a printer or there's some drama like the walled garden growing taller around them. Not only that but they also always pick up fights and leverage buyer remorse and so on. I believe them because tons of people's first 3d printer were Ender 3s, they were extremely cheap, and Creality's utter, unmitigated incompetence, absence of any proper QA, refusal to improve over completely flawed designs and issues (including proven fire hazards!) over iterations buckbroke hundreds of thousands. Creality's corner-cutting at the expense of safety, quality, and reliability cannot be understated, pure undiluted chink mentality. Quite literally the modern day makerbot (and hopefully dying the same, miserable way), except you could get them for 100-200 dollars half a decade ago (so cheap!) instead of having a four-digit price tag for a piece of shit that's a complete lottery whether it'll serve you well or forever give you issues. There's a market for people that want 3d printing as an hobby, not maintaining a 3d printer, they nailed it down for a small price premium, addressed most issues with them, and all those that didn't know what they were getting into when they were shilled enders as their first printer at the peak of their popularity many years ago discovered it doesn't have to be that way, so obviously they're in love with it.Sidenote is anyone else super suspicious of Internet bambulab shills? any thread or topic talking critiques about bambulab has a million of these guys come in and they all say the same thing about how they had an ender and their bambulab saved everything for them...id typically find it genuine but theres so many of them saying it in the same copy and paste format that it makes me suspicious.
I can't really be too mad at creality. They were the ones that made 3d printing affordable to a lot of us. I can't say though that my first printer was a creality cause it was not... it was a biqu b1. Since they don't make their hotends anymore I had to 3d print it a new hot end enclosure that let me use a generic v6. I printed every single part for that with an ender though with little to no issue. Yeah I did have to place blue tape down to get the petg to stick but I know if something goes wrong with it I can simply hop on the thingiverse and get some pieces to make the unit work better than it was initally. what I am getting at is that Enders are in fact cheap but they also force you to learn a lot about their mechanisms which results in you not having to be so self reliant on their company when things go wrong. Bambulab teaches people nothing but the mentality of a an apple user/hp user where if one thing goes wrong they have no way of learning things cause everything is so locked down which forces most who may even have a diy mindset to "just buy a new one"I believe them. Not because I don't think there's shills: 3d printing has tons of them, most involve chinese brands playing dirty and you always see them come out whenever some safety hazard is discovered with a printer or there's some drama like the walled garden growing taller around them. Not only that but they also always pick up fights and leverage buyer remorse and so on. I believe them because tons of people's first 3d printer were Ender 3s, they were extremely cheap, and Creality's utter, unmitigated incompetence, absence of any proper QA, refusal to improve over completely flawed designs and issues (including proven fire hazards!) over iterations buckbroke hundreds of thousands. Creality's corner-cutting at the expense of safety, quality, and reliability cannot be understated, pure undiluted chink mentality. Quite literally the modern day makerbot (and hopefully dying the same, miserable way), except you could get them for 100-200 dollars half a decade ago (so cheap!) instead of having a four-digit price tag for a piece of shit that's a complete lottery whether it'll serve you well or forever give you issues. There's a market for people that want 3d printing as an hobby, not maintaining a 3d printer, they nailed it down for a small price premium, addressed most issues with them, and all those that didn't know what they were getting into when they were shilled enders as their first printer at the peak of their popularity many years ago discovered it doesn't have to be that way, so obviously they're in love with it.
Almost done with mine, just need to weld the bolt lol.Gonna take the plunge and build a from-scratch FGC9 soon as well. Got like 80% of the stuff I need for the ecm process. Just need the hydraulic piping and a pump.
I have an XL at work, it's completely separate tools so there's no reason outside of the slicer software that you can't do that. With the INDX coming soon for the Core One, I suspect the Prusa Slicer support for multi tools will have some incentive to improve. I myself am very eagerly awaiting that upgrade and will order one as soon as they're available.The Prusa XL has the potential to change not only colors in each head, but also nozzle diameters and layer heights.
FreeCAD's a joy thief, at least the versions I used pre-1.0. Having to fully constrain every dimension is such a load of bullshit and a timesink when you're sketching relative to other features in the part, especially for me having started out mesh modelling in Softimage and Blender. I'd like a happy medium where I could just fuck around with the modelling and only constrain what geometry I want to.FreeCAD exists. You can use it to model your own things you can print.