2025 Jeffrey Epstein Files

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
.T.N.U.C said:
If at some time in the course of their role they required unescorted access to an Australian maritime security zone or security-sensitive area of an Australian seaport, they would have to apply for and obtain one and considering their position in a US gov dept I imagine the process would be just a formality.

It doesn't seem completely out of the realm of possibility that at some point, for some reason, a US Dept of Agriculture inspector would have to access a secure area in an Australian seaport and even a one-off would require an MSIC.

While holding one doesn't automatically grant you access, you won't be granted access without one.

Take all of the above with a grain of salt as I have extremely limited (but not zero) experience in this area of shipping and security in Australia.

Edit: having looked where the screenshot notes say ".tiff files", "designer professional", and "MSIC logo" and "letterhead mock-up" in the emails, that sounds very much like they were trying to forge a Maritime Security ID card, at least to me.
Click to expand...
That actually answers a lot. The guy had a navy federal account, so while that credit union is open to all branches i get the feeling he had a navy background, combined with the resumes from the guys who worked at kings bay.

This is just speculation, but at the same time that terramar charity raises some questions. did anyone search them up in the files, if it does not come up that would be a red flag that they are with holding information as that was supposed to be epstein's big charity.
 
Turquoise said:
disagree

He was just a boomer sending emails off a phone. He couldn't be bothered to write more.

He was intelligent without being intellectual. He understood what he needed to and coasted through life face down and oiled up.

Most of the Bannon interview focused on economics too. What did Jeff know about economic crashes? Probably nothing. What did he know about science? Probably whatever he could remember Lawrence Krauss telling him. Ask him about illegal minge and he'd probably have finished his sentences with a cartwheel.
Click to expand...
uhm. I could not find a finished sentence in the whole Bannon interview. When it comes to communicating his ideas, Epstein is a train wreck. It is surprising he got so much done in life but my guess is that he did not get much done himself but knew the right people who could. But I agree he must have had these financial/lawerish instincts that made him valuable initially and got him in the right places. Regardless. I stand by my statement: He was a retard who could not communicate his own ideas or even spell them and I don't think he ever read a book in its entirety in his life.
 
Or he was a Mossad stooge, his money and career were all smoke and his real shit was being able to play rich and powerful dorks into molesting kids and feeling like among the khabal of 'cool', all the while Mossad was filming all that shit from the toilet. For all we know his degenerate sexual fetishes, all the while still being able to present himself in society better than Chrischan, were what got him into the big league and nothing else.

Jeff really does seem retarded. No chance he was the brains behind all of this.
 
CAPTAIN HAPPY said:
Or he was a Mossad stooge, his money and career were all smoke and his real shit was being able to play rich and powerful dorks into molesting kids and feeling like among the khabal of 'cool', all the while Mossad was filming all that shit from the toilet. For all we know his degenerate sexual fetishes, all the while still being able to present himself in society better than Chrischan, were what got him into the big league and nothing else.

Jeff really does seem retarded. No chance he was the brains behind all of this.
Click to expand...
It's clear he was just a suction cup of one tentacle part of a much larger organism inside of an ocean deeper than anyone is aware of unless you're "in the know".
 

From: REDACTED
To: "Jeffrey Epstein"
Subject:
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:36:13 +0000

"Dear Jeffrey, I would like to explain my situation with the school. You always were very generous with education for my children. I always appreciate your kindness and generosity. I would like to explain the reason my kids are going to the RUSSIAN private school. The main reason is the school is for working parents. Bus pick up time is 7:30 AM and drop off at 5:30PM which gives me a chance to work full time. During the winter and spring recess school is open as Day care. Tuition for education is rather small compare to other private schools. Unfortunately it is not affordable for me with my household income. I have been exploring the Public school options which are presenting difficulties as school begins next week. Some of the obstacles I am facing includes making provisions for my kids after the school ends at 3PM. For 10 years working for you I know you as the kindness person and I would like to ask you again to please reconsider your decision about my kid's education. Thank you very much, REDACTED"

Another document about Jeff paying for kids' private school tuition:

"Jeffrey, As you suggested I explored the public school system for the school year beginning September 2013. Fortunately both of my girls were accepted into the Mark Twain public school for gifted children with ballet talent! In the past you graciously contributed up to $25,000 per year for private school tuition and summer camp. I would like to ask for your support with the after school programs tuition and summer camp. The total for the year is $9,000. As always I am very appreciative with all your help. Bella"

Yet another one:
"Jeffrey, After speaking with REDACTED* about what REDACTED school needed and getting your approval, I spoke with the principal of the Ivanna Eudora Kean High School (REDACTED school). He said that they had many needs to include their sports program and marching band. He sent the attached list. This obviously adds up to more than $20,000 but I just wanted you to know where the school will be allocating the funds. With warm regards, REDACTED"
*This first redaction was done improperly, you can see the letter peeking out of the box:
1773559603158.png

And lastly what looks like paperwork from Jeff paying a children's school in 1998:
 

Attachments

Last edited:
pro drivor said:
It's also known that Trump did call the cops on Epstein but only after he was made aware that Epstein had been caught by law enforcement
Click to expand...
Trump saying Epstein liked young girls is always floated as him being in cahoots with him and liking underage girls himself. Have people theorized that he was actually doing kind of a soft disclosure or needle with that comment?
 
Twix Eatr said:
Trump saying Epstein liked young girls is always floated as him being in cahoots with him and liking underage girls himself. Have people theorized that he was actually doing kind of a soft disclosure or needle with that comment?
Click to expand...
My opinion on Trump with this is agnostic so far, frankly I just don’t know, but I understand being a bit nervous about blowing whistles on these things given how many times a whistle blower just happened to have an accident, or commit suicide, or have other terrible things happen to them.
 
Twix Eatr said:
Trump saying Epstein liked young girls is always floated as him being in cahoots with him and liking underage girls himself. Have people theorized that he was actually doing kind of a soft disclosure or needle with that comment?
Click to expand...

Soft disclosure? No. He doesn't care about doing the right thing. Needle? Possibly.

As for Donald's personal peccadillos, I'm pretty sure he just likes normal hot chicks. However, if you put some jailbait in front of him on a lawless island, I'm not sure he could stop himself.

Same with Clinton. I'm pretty sure he just shagged anything that resembled a woman and only god knows what got caught in the crossfire over the decades. Hilary for a start...
 
I think the odds of him knowing he's into underage girls, doing it with him, and then saying that makes no sense. Clinton was said to be a perfect gentleman by the main victim gal who recently killed herself.
 
I was reading this thread and saw an old post trying to act like Thomas Massie is some kind of villain because he's friends with Don Huffines, who bought Epstein's ranch to (drumroll) turn it into a Christian resort, but the hysterics ignore the second part. They try to act like Don Huffines is an Epstein associate because he's buying his ranch and doing something good with it. Are you guilty if you bought Epstein's island and turned it into a church resort? Obviously not; it reminds me of how people are letting hysteria influence their view of the Epstein files. People think if anybody is mentioned in the Epstein files, it means they are guilty, even if they had nothing to do with Epstein. For example, is Mother Teresa guilty if Epstein mentioned her in a conversation?

Just because somebody's name was mentioned in an email doesn't make them guilty; neither does buying Epstein's ranch and doing something good with it. People need to stop being hysterical.
 
I’ve been listening to survivors talk as I randomly happen on them. It’s been interesting.

Jena Lisa Jones:

The first gives a good sense of how damaging childhood trauma can be. Even though she was nearing the edge of childhood when she was victimized, 14, you see how the trauma undercuts her ability to logically think through things and has further reaching consequences on how her personality develops and life choices.



Lisa Phillips (best interview):

Because she experienced abuse as an adult rather than as a child, the second survivor is better able to apply higher reasoning to manage her trauma symptoms. Her interview is in two parts and it shows how young women (18+) can be groomed into a human trafficking ring. She also is the first victim I’ve heard who lays out how Epstein would traffic women not just for himself, but other men. In particular, models. She mentions how she was set up to ‘date’ a powerful senator but refuses to name names. Understandably so. The government will not protect her, nor will we. Why should she take further risks? Both survivors reasonably believe that nothing will be done about their abuse or that of other victims. There will be no real accountability.

[Part 1]

[Part 2]

I’m not going to go as far as to say I don’t believe these women entire stories. But, there are aspects of their interviews which make me question if they are being less than truthful.

Marina Lacerda

Another teenager victim. She was an illegal immigrant, it sounds like her family or biological father wanted her to stay in her home country. Her mother (awful person) forced her to stay illegally, with her and her stepfather in the US (who was also here illegally, so her whole family was here illegally). Her stepfather raped her. Starting at the age of 8 and continuing for years before a friend introduced her to Epstein. The mother helped cover it up. She mentions throughout her story how she felt she 'had' to stay with Epstein and help Epstein find other victims because she ‘needed’ the money. Because she ‘needed’ to stay in the US illegally. And how scared she was to ever go to the cops for everything because she feared deportation.

And yet, she is super pro-illegal immigration and anti-trump, despite how being an illegal clearly made her vulnerable to multiple predators.

I’m not really sure about this one. After she aged out of Epstein, (according to her Epstein implied she grew to mature for him), she went on her own way for some time until the FBI was knocking on her door leading up to the 2008 case. The first thing she did was call Epstein for help. She claims she stopped helping Epstein recruit children when she reached 18, legal adult age.

She sounds a bit guilty, and I think she’s not being honest about her entire story. She’s definitely still a victim. There is just something sus about her.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she’s misrepresenting details to hide her own perceived guilt.


Juliette Bryant

She claims to have been to Epstein’s Zorro Ranch where she was SUPER RAPED and has missing memory. The way she describes how the abuse escalated doesn’t align with the other victims, and she has lost memories. People with lost memories are notoriously unreliable narrators. Additionally, her emotional effect is all over the place. Like a mentally unwell person.

Could be 100 percent truthful and her brain was broken from the rape, could be that she was raped but her schizo brain is scrambling details, could be entirely fabricated. I have no idea.

 
Cybork said:
I’ve been listening to survivors talk as I randomly happen on them. It’s been interesting.
Click to expand...
Marina Lacerda sounds like the chomo victims who think we should give pedophiles a chance but with added La Raza.

Juliette Bryant is the one who claims to have seen UFOs at Zorro Ranch and Epstein morph into a reptilian for a second before her eyes.
 
Manly_Brony said:
Marina Lacerda sounds like the chomo victims who think we should give pedophiles a chance but with added La Raza.

Juliette Bryant is the one who claims to have seen UFOs at Zorro Ranch and Epstein morph into a reptilian for a second before her eyes.
Click to expand...

many of the women are from broken homes and would be unreliable nutjobs if they'd never met Jizz and Jeff.

However, i do like the theory that theyd feed some victims hallucinogenics to prevent them from being reliable witnesses. outside chance thats what happened to juliette but she's probably just nuts
 
Manly_Brony said:
Juliette Bryant is the one who claims to have seen UFOs at Zorro Ranch and Epstein morph into a reptilian for a second before her eyes
Click to expand...
Turquoise said:
However, i do like the theory that theyd feed some victims hallucinogenics to prevent them from being reliable witnesses. outside chance thats what happened to juliette but she's probably just nuts
Click to expand...
There are accounts from the Franklin scandal that involve victims being given some kind of intoxicating drug before they are directed to perform rituals. It wouldn’t surprise me in the least.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom