2025 Jeffrey Epstein Files

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Zuckerberg is gay
zuckerberg gay.png
 
I have nothing new to add right now really, just want to remind everyone of the fun of looking up the origins of words like "magic, magi/priest, spells, trance" etc.
There was something I've seen around, it was in the Q stuff and other places-
From Oct 21, 2020 Q drop - https://qalerts.app/?n=4909
Democrat party being held up by various media groups.

🌷Don't let the bastards get you down.🌷
 
clickbait said:
View attachment 8581025
Click to expand...

Andrew’s arrest is just a smokescreen.

Sure, arresting an ex “prince” might sound grandiose, but he is a small fish. He had zero chance to inherit the throne. In practice, he was just a rich guy who lucked out and would otherwise be a footnote in history. He is not even being arrested for being a sex pest.

They are just giving us the small fishes as sacrificial lambs to appease the public. We still don't know the big names that could “collapse the system” by their own words. We still don’t know who was behind Epstein and who else is doing pedo shit like him. Millions of people are disappearing yearly, and they sure as hell are not telling us how bad it really is. Or the obvious cult-like behavior.

This is 100X worse than watergate and all they have given us are small fishes, medium fishes in Europan countries, trying to implicate dead guys like Michael Jackson, old geezers that will not live enough to see jail (Clinton and Gates), and losers that Epstein rejected (Musk).

This is just a circus.
 
Kalamazoo 2 Timbuktu said:
Epstein had somewhat of a collection of poisonous or hallucinogenic flowers and trees. But many of us do. Maybe blue lotus?
Click to expand...
Epstein was big into alchemy and arcane blood magic stuff. He seemed to think he could find a philosophers stone of sorts and extend his life. That's why it was so absurd he would ever kill himself. You wont find that in the files though, this was known well before his death. I'm not sure where you can find an "Epsteincyclopedia" anymore, like a CWCki. I think many people thought that chapter was closed with his death. *sigh*
 
Dagoth AMOGUS said:
philosophers stone
Click to expand...
I ran across mention of this. I believe it was in the Bannon conversations. It doesn’t pull up for me on a search though and I didn’t save it. It was only Bannon asking Epstein if he had knowledge and Epstein saying yes and that they would talk about it in person.


Jean-Luc Brunell does not appear to be connected to what Steve Bannon and Epstein are speaking about. I’m just providing some context.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 11/EFTA02433596.pdf

Jean-Luc Brunell to Epstein: “I hope you don’t think I’m going out dressed like a kamikaze”
IMG_3760.jpeg
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 10/EFTA01615497.pdf

Steve Bannon and Epstein
IMG_3761.jpeg

Makes you wonder about others connected to Epstein and the files. Like Robert Durst and the Durst organization.
IMG_3759.jpeg
 
Party Hat Wurmple said:
Probably some form of Datura. If I had to make a bet, it might be Datura Stramonium since that's the one most affiliated with amnesia and it would grow quite well on any island. It also grows in a bush-like fashion that would bloom lots of flowers. I have no idea how you would extract this poison though. It also probably won't kill you, but the plant would require some special care.

There is also Angel's Trumpet which actually has been criminally used for this purpose before, but it's far more lethal and harder to control compared to Datura. It also grows well on islands and in cluster-like bushes.

Edit: To me though, if I'm going to use drugs to give people amnesia, it's pretty clear killing them is off the table. Angel's Trumpet just seems like a huge gamble even though I'm sure there are people who know how to administer it safely. I'm sure Epstein could and would have the means to do it and reliably. However, when it comes to poisoning someone- you can't control other people's bodies and how they react. If you're going to go through the trouble of wanting to wipe someone's memory in the first place, why ever take the chance when Datura seems to be a safer alternative? The alkaloid levels are far easier to measure reliably and control. Sure you can administer Angel's Trumpet via tea, but Datura can be tea, smoked, or even used in ointments that can be administered while...getting a massage.
Click to expand...
The super elite don't brew amnesia potions from their garden. They have full access to any drugs they want and plenty of sleeping pills have that effect already
 
I haven't seen anyone mention this yet in regards to Karyna Shuliak being a dentist (which was paid for by Epstein).

In Lolita, Quilty (you know, the big important pedophile), is the nephew of a famous dentist and he uses this to meet girls (Dolores being one of them). Humbert (and the readers) keep seeing references to this dentist constantly throughout the story, like it's hiding in plain sight.

Get it? That's almost certainly where Eggstein got the idea to make Shuliak a dentist. And we know he liked to use women to recruit girls.

1771546516713.png


And when you put that together with Apollo, the company of Epstein's patron Leon Black, owning Lifetouch and Shutterfly, which take 90% of schoolkids photos, it really makes you think, doesn't it?
 
Party Hat Wurmple said:
There is also Angel's Trumpet which actually has been criminally used for this purpose before, but it's far more lethal and harder to control compared to Datura. It also grows well on islands and in cluster-like bushes.
Click to expand...
Once you get anywhere near the level of owning a private island you can get all the xannyberries you need, no need for any alchemical concoctions.
 
I'm still going through the whole deposition, but I saw this and thought it was AI, and then I go and check and see it from multiple news sources first hand.

So Wexner reveals some information about Epstein's other connections, giving more than short answers (or pleading the 5th like all these other fuckers), and his lawyer whispers "I will fucking kill you if you answer another question with more than 5 words."

I guess the mundane explanation would be the dude is a "high-powered" lawyer and is using extreme language to express his frustration with his client. It's probably the most likely explanation, but the whole thing strikes me as weird so it's hard to gauge. Going to watch through the rest to see if there's anything else noteworthy.


1771560002455.png

CSPAN youtube clip (same thing as below)

 
KifflomKween said:
I haven't seen anyone mention this yet in regards to Karyna Shuliak being a dentist (which was paid for by Epstein).

In Lolita, Quilty (you know, the big important pedophile), is the nephew of a famous dentist and he uses this to meet girls (Dolores being one of them). Humbert (and the readers) keep seeing references to this dentist constantly throughout the story, like it's hiding in plain sight.

Get it? That's almost certainly where Eggstein got the idea to make Shuliak a dentist. And we know he liked to use women to recruit girls.

View attachment 8583448


And when you put that together with Apollo, the company of Epstein's patron Leon Black, owning Lifetouch and Shutterfly, which take 90% of schoolkids photos, it really makes you think, doesn't it?
Click to expand...
He really wanted her to be a dentist.

"Columbia University has punished two people affiliated with its dental college after documents released by the Justice Department revealed that they had bypassed the normal process to help Jeffrey Epstein’s girlfriend gain admission.... The university also said it had identified $210,000 in donations from “entities related to” Mr. Epstein.... Dr. Magnani, Mr. Epstein’s dentist, was the point person for the effort to secure Ms. Shuliak’s admission, arranging a tour of the college and helping to revive her application, the Justice Department documents show." The article goes on to detail how the program accommodated her in various ways. It does not appear she was practicing, so Epstein wasn't using her to meet victims, I don't think.

Link

Archive

I'm not sure if the files mention anything about teeth in particular, but that's a very bizarre, ritualistic looking room. Apart from yanking out the teeth of victims that like to bite, I am not sure what the use could be.
 
d3_1337_3d said:
I'm still going through the whole deposition, but I saw this and thought it was AI, and then I go and check and see it from multiple news sources first hand.

So Wexner reveals some information about Epstein's other connections, giving more than short answers (or pleading the 5th like all these other fuckers), and his lawyer whispers "I will fucking kill you if you answer another question with more than 5 words."

I guess the mundane explanation would be the dude is a "high-powered" lawyer and is using extreme language to express his frustration with his client. It's probably the most likely explanation, but the whole thing strikes me as weird so it's hard to gauge. Going to watch through the rest to see if there's anything else noteworthy.


View attachment 8584293

CSPAN youtube clip (same thing as below)

I will fucking kill you if you answer another question with more than five words, okay. - C-SP...mp4
Click to expand...
no professional talks to their client this way, much less in a fucking official setting even if they were "high-powered"
 
d3_1337_3d said:
You might be right - I should have clarified that my entire idea of that archetype is exclusively from TV shows and movies.
Click to expand...
committing assault (the threat of violence, battery is actually hurting someone) as a legal practitioner is bad, m'kay
especially to your client
especially to your client in front of other people
especially to your client in front of legal officials
 
God of Nothing said:
committing assault (the threat of violence, battery is actually hurting someone) as a legal practitioner is bad, m'kay
especially to your client
especially to your client in front of other people
especially to your client in front of legal officials
Click to expand...
Lol that's a good point. Perhaps I went a little too retarded, trying to keep my first impressions reserved. There's just so much odd shit with all of this that I try to consider the most boring options first so I don't go full blown schizo.

Going back over the lead up to "I will fucking kill you."

https://youtu.be/xiUMxo46fAM?si=6xlXyEMWh1C5Y-Nq&t=15512 - starts about here

Had to take fucking notes because this nigga rambles so much it's hard to follow.


- interviewer asks 'what did you understand yourself to be hiring Epstein for?'
  • he had someone managing his personal stuff because he suddenly had so much complexity in his life because he had too many houses and assets that should be inventoried
  • Epstein didn't want to be paid, which Wexner describes as being part of the con -> lawyer starts getting antsy around here, staring him down, commenting on how long his answers are, touches his arm, tells him to answer the question only to directly answer what they're asking
  • Wexner started paying him for the work after two years of cleaning up his personal affairs
- interviewer asks 'Epstein had other clients while working for him; was it understood to be part time?'
  • he wouldn't describe it that way but he thought it wasn't full time because he had other clients of substance
- interview asks 'With you being one of the wealthiest people in the country, how could he do that job but do work for other clients at the same time'
  • you could supervise the work - it could be thorough if you supervise/overview 1-3 days a month
  • blah blah inventory silverware
  • he hired a lady to be house manager that had run the U.S. Embassy in Rome -> lawyer grabs his arm and shoulder and whispers ''I will fucking kill you...." and says 'answer the question' more loudly and laughs

- interviewer changes the subject to question about the house that Wexner once owned that later became the subject of a bidding war between Trump and Epstein



not directly related to the context of the threat, but I thought this exchange was strange - https://youtu.be/xiUMxo46fAM?si=bGmGGmD7xYTjTG_Z&t=16148

- interviewer asks about Victoria's Secret and Epstein presenting himself as a recruiter around 1993
  • he was told Epstein was trying to pick up women by telling people he was a talent scout
  • he didn't believe it but was going to put a stop to it (??) and called him up and asked him about it and Jeffrey said 'what do you think I'm stupid?', and Wexner says he replied 'well I hope not because if not you'd be dead'
 
Last edited:
Kalamazoo 2 Timbuktu said:
I like the idea of regular people owning these things. I have an original oil found years and years ago at a thrift store. At the time, $500 dollars, especially at a thrift store was a lot of money. I didn’t even know what I had for over a decade. My husband has since tried to get me to sell it. (Over my dead body) Someone has most of this painters other pieces and the collection is currently on loan to a museum.

I let my child’s home school co-op come and see it, even touch it. It gives me a perverse thrill to know these people would be having a coronary over little kids putting their fingers all over it.
Click to expand...
I'm not talking about an oil painting. I support and applaud people owning, experiencing, and appreciating art. This is a manuscript written by Leonardo da Vinci, one of the most famous people of all time and an incredibly important mind in the Western canon.
 

The interviewer also asks Wexner about a weird email between him and Epstein in June of 2008 after his conviction.

I can no longer find the email on the DOJ website - idk if I'm missing it because of a weird OCR search issue or something or they removed it. But I found it in jmail.

1771568220065.png
there's no transcript yet on the video, so I tried to do a relatively accurate transcription because I thought his answers were kinda wild.

INTERVIEWER: 'clearly either you knew or Epstein had said to you his number 1 rule was to be careful, so what was he so careful about?'

WEXNER: 'about being honest, and stealing from me, us. these criminal, terrible, horrible things that he did. and I don't know what prompted me, when I saw this, I think I was just giving him the finger. Something in the news. Something. Maybe it was the fact that Abigail told me and I was cooking on it. You sold yourself as a careful, honest fiduciary, and you completely robbed us and did all these terrible things. '

INTERVIEWER: 'it sounds like you knew at least at the time that Mr Epstein would say that his number one rule was to be careful. what do you recall that being in the context of; why was that his number one rule?'

WEXNER: 'again, he alleged himself to be a fiduciary, and I'm always careful about my clients. I don't do risky investments. I wasn't looking for cleverness, I was looking for accuracy. Jeffrey would say 'don't worry I'm always very careful'. And that might have meant to be not abusive to my admin or be prompt and accurate with tax returns. He's just careful because that's what you would expect. If my personal attorney would say 'I'm always careful', that would ring comfortably for me. And....complete crook.'

INTERVIEWER: 'the crime he plead to was not insignificant. it involved a minor. that would seem to not necessarily be the product of not being careful. do you recall whether you felt anger, shock, or simply how can you have been so careless?'

WEXNER: 'I don't remember how I felt. Probably anger. That someone in a trust position could have been so mistrusted, so crooked.... so bad.'

INTERVIEWER: 'When was the last time you spoke with Epstein'

WEXNER: 'Probably sometime before I gave him the finger. '07 or '08. Sometimes when he got in trouble, in my mind, is when he died.' -> lawyer laughs.

INTERVIEWER: 'at this point you were definitely in communication. this email was in mid '08'. I'll clarify any electronic or verbal communication.'

WEXNER: 'I wouldn't remember that I did this. When I found out how bad his sexual behavior was and he was stealing from us....Dead.'

INTERVIEWER: 'You had said he initially framed the investigation as a massage and an overzealous police chief. Do you recall that?'

WEXNER: 'I don't recall it. I think he told Abigail that and she told me.' -> lawyer interjects 'No not what she told you'

WEXNER continues: 'I don't know. How I know I don't know.'

INTERVIEWER: 'Do you recall when you became aware of his crimes involving minors?'

WEXNER: 'Don't recall'

.....


INTERVIEWER: 'Are there other individuals in Epstein's orbit at the time that you think we should talk to who might have an understanding of his crimes?'

WEXNER: 'What I'm thinking is he referenced several people that I never met. Do I think they might have information? Possibly but I don't know whether they made it up or he really did it... Like he'd say he was in Aspen and the family that owns Fidelity in Massachusetts, Johnson. I work for Abigail Johnson and I was there talking to her about their family situation. He could have been making it up, but at the time 'oh he works for the Johnson family; they're pretty sophisticated.' He would talk about the founders of Google. That they were friends and he'd visit them. He'd say 'you should come out to San Francisco and meet the Amazon guy'. And I said 'you know I'm too busy and I'm interested and I don't do what he does.' And he said 'he's a smart guy you should meet him.' And I said 'If I'm every in San Francisco I'll look him up but I'm too busy.' ..... There were so many names dropped and I'm not interested in celebrities...political celebrities or whatever. I don't want to mislead and get a woman I don't know in trouble like Abigail Johnson, but up until the fact that I believed he was a crook, I believed that he knew all these people...... Did I believe he knew Clinton. No I didn't believe it. Sometimes people say they know people in high places.'

......

INTERVIEWER: 'Do you have any reflections on your relationship with Epstein or the pain and suffering he and his accomplices inflicted on victims and survivors largely with resources?'

WEXNER: 'I believe he had a lot of resources besides mine. In hindsight, I think he had multiple personalities. Incredibly smart, which I didn't really see. When you can bullshit nobel laureates about physics and university professors and physicians and all the people I've read about. If it was a movie no one would believe it. When I read about him and the connections...the perspective to understand that would be to understand how intelligent he was as a criminal and all the things that he did. I have trouble imagining how he'd do all the shit that he did...forget about work...in a 48 hour day. Because it was always so busy with my stuff and then you find out all these relationships. It's mind boggling. Some of it, even today, I can't believe that it's so, but some of the stuff I believe because I read about it. To understand all this stuff, I hope you guys are really good. At the dismay of my advisors, to give you an accurate picture of how I am and how he was, how I perceived him...diabolical isn't a big enough word. Bernie Madoff is a boy scout compared to him. If I just believe what I read about the people he contacted...university presidents, Gergen, my friend. It's crazy. But he was beyond perfect or good at doing all the shit that he did. I think it's the innuendo that goes around makes me mad because I'm a very straight arrow and a very responsible person. I don't want to give you a speech of my virtue but I'm comfortable in my own skin. It's so preposterous to me what he got away with for so long with so many people, that I can't imagine how a mind could do that and be robbing banks.'

INTERVIEWER: 'Your counsel represented to DOJ that your assets accounted virtually all of Epstein's wealth. It sounds like you don't agree with that.'

WEXNER: 'I wouldn't know it. I don't really know what his wealth is. Island, house, all that lifestyle, buying peoples gifts. It would seem to me that having a good sense of how much money he stole from us and more than that we don't know about yet because it was disguised. Bank robbers don't rob one bank. There's more there. And I can understand why people like myself who were robbed don't want to be mentioned...don't want to appear naive, dumb. When I look in the mirror I see an honest person, but to this I was completely blind.'


1771570080027.png
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom