2025 Jeffrey Epstein Files

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Thumb Butler said:
Must have been some serious Clinton diddling or something of that kind.
Click to expand...
Whatever people are doing this seem to have a bias towards implicating Clinton. That big doc with all the black images are likely a slideshow of him spreading the legs of girls so young they couldn't have voted when he ran. For every instance Trump has been mentioned Clinton has come up about 15 times, which does not add up with how close Trump and Clinton were back when they could still sustain an erection.
 
1766241308464.png
[REDACTED]
 
I can't stomach reading all this because it's infuriating and the thought of all this, from the abuse to the cover-up makes my stomach hurt.

So I ask:
- was there verifiable abuse of children?
- if so, will the perpetrators and those covering it up face justice?

Genuinely asking.
 
Tasty Tatty said:
Again... if Donald Trump had indeed done something, we would have known by now. Because leftists aren't very smart and believe me, they were so desperate to keep him from power that they would have leaked any information of him,
Click to expand...
Not really. You’re making the mistake of thinking in partisan terms about an issue that isn’t partisan. It’s not left vs right — it’s pedo elites vs us the people who demand justice.

They’re all covering for each other. All political parties.Even internationally. Sure, they’ll shit-talk each other when it’s election time, but in reality they’re all under the same umbrella of corrupt politicians. Not being outed by other people who may also have dirt doesn’t prove innocence.

As the saying goes, “People in glass houses don’t throw stones.”

And this isn’t just about Trump. If he is innocent, then he should be left alone.If not, he should fall.

I want all pedos to fall, no matter who they are or what their politics are. If elites weren’t involved, there wouldn’t be this much redaction, delays, and censorship. The elites are covering their own asses across all political spectrums.
 
Urusei Baktsura said:
Whatever people are doing this seem to have a bias towards implicating Clinton. That big doc with all the black images are likely a slideshow of him spreading the legs of girls so young they couldn't have voted when he ran. For every instance Trump has been mentioned Clinton has come up about 15 times, which does not add up with how close Trump and Clinton were back when they could still sustain an erection.
Click to expand...
I think it's more of nothing new got released about Trump, it was stuff we had scene already or it was just a mention of his name compared to everything that got released about Clinton. That's not solely on the DOJ, look at some of what the House Committee released yesterday as well.

We really need to see all the files and find a way to at least get some of the documents unredacted, photos should probably stay redacted unless the victim specifically requests otherwise imo. The documents may not really prove as much as a picture but some of the redacted ones are blocking names of people who aren't victims or at threat of prosecution right now.

I think those are what I want to see, like who's the redacted name getting "J" young girls from Russia, and why is that name redacted.
 
Some of these redactions just feel like they're turbo-redacting without checking anything, just to get them out as close to "on time" as they can. I'm not even necessarily talking about the spicy stuff everyone is here for, I mean mundane stuff, and public photos/text that were already unredacted in their original forms. Stuff with no actual meaning for people who know. Like they're just playing it safe.
 
so have we figured out anything new from the third epstein files release or is it just a bunch of pictures that make epstein look like a cool and generally well regarded guy
 
I see a lot of people are weirded out by the random, creepy, modern artpieces randomly strewn in the basic neoclassicist/neobaroque interior.
A lot of rich fucks with no taste do that. They let an interior decorator do the first design in gaudy white/gold palatial style, and then through the decades they buy or get gifted shitty contemporary artpieces, and they just randomly put it somewhere.

I have seen this multiple times, it is rather common. I have seen abstract sculptures of feet and see urchins right next to original 18th century furniture.
 
They shouldn't be allowed to redact anything but the names and faces of minor victims and any underage nudity. Literally everything else should be fully visible. So fucking tired of the lack of transparency in everything the government does.
 
i hate it about michael (the kids more obviously), i always leaned more toward the camp of he was fucked in the head from childhood, did sleepovers probably because he was in arrested development, probably didn't assault kids but the sleepover shit was enough to raise eyebrows and the parents should have been against letting their kids sleepover with a (popular) non related man. you know, fucked in the head eccentric artist who needed handlers to not do socially retarded things

but nah, he was most certainly smart enough as shown in calls and other leaked material, there's no way he didn't know wtf was going on at that island, and if he both went there and spent that much time there, and also never mentioned a single word of it/tried saying there was fucky shit going on with kids, likely he had shit on him. which also leads to further doubt on all his prior cases, which is sad because there is a lot of shit in them that's just really weird, forcing people to testify, leaked calls where random jews said they were going to ruin him, and you could make a strong argument a lot was just for money, but going by this apparently there was a lot for money but also actual shit. YOU KNOW HE'S BAD, HE'S BAD
 
Steak Tartare said:
Found it unredacted
Transcript of videotaped deposition of Juan Alessi
from Sep 8th 2009

People and characters he names: Senator George Mitchell, Prince Andrew. Princess Sarah/Ferguson. Alan Deshowitz. Mr Trump. Robert Kennedy Jr. Frederick Fekkai (a hairstylist). David Copperfield. Bill Clinton. A fixer bigwig office guy in NY named Lesley. a Nobel Price winning math/chem/science guy. an English chef named Rupert a french chef named Didier. Glen Dubin (hedge fund manager) visited and is now married to Eva (the previous Maxwell). Jean Luc Bruhel. A young guy from New York named something like Ryan Dion/Don Perry.
Click to expand...
Note that in the Alessi deposition, he keeps talking about a young victim named N.B., who Epstein would later repay by giving her a successful acting career. Alessi mentions she was in a soap opera.

In the Virginia Roberts interview, she mentions a “Nadia Bjournik”. Googling that results in finding a Nadia Bjorlin, who completely coincidentally was on Days Of Our Lives:


EDIT: Looks like Deadline Detroit knew about this connection in 2019, but perhaps didn’t know that Nadia ended up at Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion. They only said he “targeted” her when she was at a performing arts camp: https://www.deadlinedetroit.com/art...epstein_owned_cabin_at_michigan_s_interlochen
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom