2025 Jeffrey Epstein Files

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
gay said:
does anyone know why the flight logs in the Epstein files are all redacted to shit even though they're publicly available besides the DOJ being a bunch of incompetent assholes running cover for pedophiles?

View attachment 8308861
from US vs. Maxwell

View attachment 8308863
from the Epstein files (document GX-662-R)

meanwhile the DOJ says this shit:
View attachment 8308901

...barely a month after Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which has this tidbit:
View attachment 8308902

if several people don't get crucified in public at the end of this i'm going to be really peeved.
Click to expand...
I think this was addressed as it's because of how much stuff needed to be redacted in the 30 day window that they purposefully over-redacted stuff. It doesn't look great but if the redaction process is even a little bit tedious I could see why you'd do that.

They obviously can't release everything unredacted, and other thing I've been seeing on media outlets is them taking statements from individual victims saying they shouldn't be redacted when it's easier to just redact all of them in a time crunch.

It reads to me like the DoJ isn't malicious but was woefully ignorant in preparing the documents for release before they got the deadline.
 
Cool. How come you seppos don't flex your 2nd ammendment right and sort this shit out. You're ruled over by the most fuckin evil people in the world and yous all are gonna do diddly squat and shit about it. So many comments about the government needs to do something when it's the fuckin government that is the fuckin problem. Come the fuck on, yous are the fuckin heart and soul of the Western World. Do somethin
 
Last edited:
WhiskeyJack said:
Obama's ties to Epstein are all through proxies, namely his WH lawyer (and very nearly Attorney General) Kathryn Ruemmler, who was basically BFFs with Obama and Epstein.
Click to expand...
That makes me wonder if they were biden's puppet masters, at the same time i sorta doubt that because they seemed to have been pro trump unless epstein was playing both sides, which is a strong possibility.
 
2 Faces 2 Colours said:
But do you really think that Bill Clinton being in the files doesn't mean anything? Like, he's still friends with Biden, Obama, and possibly Harris, that could be ammo against the establishment Democrats. Nobody cares about the old scandal with his secretary if that's what you're referring to.
Click to expand...
Notice the complete lack of defence of Clinton by anyone important. The silence is a condemnation for these people. It's the bullshit team sports way of signalling it. You won't see them decry Clinton because they are spineless fucking vessels for career narcissism, thinking about party before the safety of hundreds of kids.
Dems are not running active defence like those in office, but the Democrats have less to lose by sacrificing the implicated involved than Republicans... But it's still political theatre just less agregeous.

you might get twitter/Reddit retards saying: "my political side's Pedo is less bad than yours!" but they are fucking deluded anyway using this to score points.

MTG is probably the only person I could point at currently as someone I would consider Human. She seemed loyal to Trump even when she didn't seem to gain anything in doing so. She seems to be the only one with the bravery to put morality before personal gain.

Doesn't the cognitive dissonance of defending a guy with basically as much dirt on him as Clinton hurt? Even if it ends up that Trump didn't actively diddle kids, no alarm bells that he swapped minors with Epstein and used to be photographed with underage Pagent winners from his events? Was he doing that to just pretend he was sleeping with 17 year olds for the tabloids, whilst secretly being against preying on them?

This should've been bipartisan even if one party is damaged more than the other, it sickens me to see anyone think different, including the silent democrats. Who wants to work near any of these freaks or thinks of trivial shit like local elections figures when weighing the pros/cons of continuing child rape?
 
potato in mah painus said:
We know from documents wikileaks has that he was chemically castrated to keep that voice longer. Its hard to imagine him indulging in Epstein's wares when the man didn't have a sex drive.
Click to expand...

Chemically or even physically being castrated is not guaranteed to eliminate sex drive. Especially if that sex drive is tied to some form of paraphillia, like being a pedo. There have been convicted pedophiles who have undergone castration and end up abusing children again afterwards. They just end up using analogs instead of their own "equipment".
 
RandomTwitterGuy said:
The issue is that the Democrats' base doesn't worship Bill Clinton. Some of the Establishment might have seen him some 10-15 years ago as someone who had some sway, but those days are long gone. The Clintons are a non-entity in modern politics, maybe some money, but that is about it. No one is going to defend Clinton.
Click to expand...
While it's true that Bill doesn't have the overt clout he used to, that doesn't mean he lacks sway behind the scenes. It's true that his main use in public is for 90s turbo-boomer democrats who don't read the news.
Tin Foil Hatter said:
That makes me wonder if they were biden's puppet masters
Click to expand...
I thought it was confirmed that Biden's puppet masters were the Politburo? I don't know if/how many of those names are connected in the files per se, but confirmed members 100% glow in the dark.
Tin Foil Hatter said:
unless epstein was playing both sides, which is a strong possibility.
Click to expand...
I don't even think that's a possibility at this point; that's just what was happening.
 
Fag Alert Major Fag Alert said:
Biden loves smelling hairy legs. Doesn’t matter if he has super cancer. That man is indeed guilty even if he hasn’t yet.
Click to expand...
He can't even keep off hands from children in public on camera. Just imagine what that sort of man would do in private behind closed doors... Tells everything you need to know about his supporters and voters...
 
Xarpho's Return said:
Michael Jackson was not a happy person. He was basically a miserable, drug-addled wreck who had been manipulated and taken advantage of his entire life.
Click to expand...
He was also in pain, basicly all the time unless he was on some drugs. This is because at one point he literally caught fire during filming for some ad, made him easy to control for guys close to him like Dr Conrad Murray for an example (thats the sussy guy that supplied the drugs and got convicted for manslaughter when MJ died).

Its a small but powerful circle of these deeply unhappy but insanely wealthy train wrecks who are basicly all tied to Epstein at this point. There are psychopaths like Gates and Bubba mixed in too who seem to actually enjoy this stuff, those are the animals that Epstein and Jizzlane considered as friends and you can really see this from their conversations and images. Their every convo was like a miniature bro down.
 
>releasing the epstien files in parts
Man, the DOJ have real good work ethic, who are they linkara?
"The Epstein blackmail documents HAVE. NO. SET. SCHEDULE. IT WILL BE OUT WHEN ITS OUT!!!!"
 
Last edited:
One of the largest bureaucracies in the world releasing self incriminating information about former presidents and the wealthy and powerful was always going to happen in chunks and over time. They were never going to send you a simple PDF lime "here's 100 names of rich pedophiles as well as CSAM material that's obviously attached as evidence and the testimonies and descriptions of sex abuse victims!" There's always going to be black bars and pages because that's how all sex crimes involving children are handeled in America.

The problem for Trump is that his enemies assume he's dying of super aids from giving Putin rimjobs if he looks tired, any retractions or black tape whatsoever are going to give them room to yell

"oh they covered up the specific photo where trump strapped a toddler to his face like a mask and called himself covid compliant! Incriminating!!!"

There's never going to be a satisfying resolution to this. There will always be a "whats on the black pages?" but there always has to be black pages.

We just have to use this opportunity to do what really matters. Avenge Serbia by asking that old cunt Hillary Clinton what she knows about her husband and Jeffery Epstein before putting her in a home. A bad one.
 
A-Stump said:
My best guess would be Alice from Alice in Wonderland (though I dont get the striped stockings) and Little Red Riding Hood doing...uhh, something.
Click to expand...
Alice is often drawn with striped tights. The design goes back as far as to the original art for Through the Looking Glass. In color, they're usually drawn red or blue.
Alice in Wonderland is also often associated with pedophilia and the "little girl lover" side of that degeneracy, because of the relationship Lewis Caroll had with a little girl named Alice Liddell; Lewis named and based Alice off of this girl.



It's generally accepted that Lewis was obsessed with her, supported by the fact that he had a lot of questionable "erotica" of prepubescent girls and spoke very fondly of them.


Apparently Lewis wanted to marry her when she was 11, which caused a rift between him and her family and his access to her was limited or completely broken off.



But officially, I guess we don't know how far it went. The entries of his diary around this time are missing from his diary archive. He was a prolific journaler, but those entries happened to go missing through the years… so make that what you will.


Im not going to dissuade anyone from liking Alice in Wonderland, especially because these things weren't generally talked about with scandal like they are now.

But yeah, often times freaks associate themselves with Alice for that specific reason. I think it's an older pedophile shibboleth (as in, not something used common now but used more in the past), but it still does exist.

Also the Alice imagery speaks to what he likes in his victims: a blonde, pale girl who's confused and incredibly naive and far away from what she knows.


The Little Red Riding Hood imagery is probably the same: a sweet innocent girl gets asked to run a chore and expects to find her grandma. Instead she's captured by a wolf (a predatory animal).

So I'm not surprised if he has Alice stuff. At all.
 
I believe a lot of these redactions could, hypothetically, be unredacted with some clever AI algorithms. Seems like something LLM is basically made for. Not that I'd know anything about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom