2025 Jeffrey Epstein Files

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
It doesnt work that way.
The House was due to vote next week on releasing the Epstein files. It would still need to pass in the Senate and then signed by Trump.

“Speaker Mike Johnson now plans to schedule a vote on releasing the Epstein files next week, in a strategic shift spurred by the realization that it could not be stopped. The vote is expected to attract significant support from rank-and-file GOP lawmakers.”

Trump ordering a DOJ investigation provides another reason to block releasing the files because it makes it an ongoing investigation.

“But the newly announced criminal investigation could give the Justice Department a new justification to resist turning over files — or convince some lawmakers to back off. Generally, the department resists giving Congress files during an ongoing criminal investigation because any public release could jeopardize the integrity of the probe or any resulting criminal case.”

This is a reversal from July, when the DOJ claimed there wasn’t enough evidence to pursue uncharged third parties. It seems the only that changed was Trump literally asking for an investigation into Democrat-leaning targets.

“There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions,” the memo said. “We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.”
 
Last edited:
“There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions,” the memo said. “We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.”
1763260138308.png
Congress can tell Trump to do whatever, but neither Trump nor Congress can release the sealed stuff that the judicial branch is in charge of.
I'd love to know what you intend to do about that.
 
Possibly. More likely are the targets explicitly mentioned in his post, “I will be asking A.G. Pam Bondi, and the Department of Justice, together with our great patriots at the FBI, to investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s involvement and relationship with Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, Reid Hoffman, J.P. Morgan, Chase, and many other people and institutions, to determine what was going on with them, and him.”

Congress can tell Trump to do whatever, but neither Trump nor Congress can release the sealed stuff that the judicial branch is in charge of.
I'd love to know what you intend to do about that.
I don’t intend to do anything about it. If Congress does vote to compel the release of the documents, considering 75% of Americans also want the files released, I imagine that the public pressure would lead to a tenuous situation for anyone attempting to block it.
 
Last edited:
He was at eva it literally says so in his emails. The most generous eva location I can give you is 2 and a half hours away from mar a lago, and one hour after that email was sent Trump is at mar a lago publicly with press taking pictures. The timelines dont match in the slightest.
You're not considering if Glenn and Eva Andersson-Dubin were at Mar-a-lago with him.
 
As unreliable as I regard Newsweek, they claim to have interviewed Mark Epstein (A), the sender of the email:
"Bubba" is a nickname sometimes attributed to former President Bill Clinton. Mark Epstein told Newsweek the individual referenced in the exchange was not Clinton, but did not offer any information about the identity of "Bubba" or the meaning behind the message to his brother.
I probably wouldn't elaborate either if I was caught being chummy with my infamous pedo brother and casually joking about him giving the Russians kompromat on a sitting president.
 
I probably wouldn't elaborate either if I was caught being chummy with my infamous pedo brother and casually joking about him giving the Russians kompromat on a sitting president.
I haven't even heard of that nigga. He's doing a good job keeping a low profile.

NYT: Epstein Emails Reveal a Lost New York (archive)
The disgraced financier’s recently released documents are steeped in a clubby world that is all but gone.
As the emails stretch through the years, they show how that protected realm vanished into the mists of time, pulled under by the rising forces of the internet and the #MeToo movement. Mr. Epstein and some of his male correspondents seem to squirm as they notice society changing around them.
😭
 
I haven't even heard of that nigga. He's doing a good job keeping a low profile.

NYT: Epstein Emails Reveal a Lost New York (archive)


😭
Not really, he's been on Tucker Carlson's show and made multiple media appearances.
It just confirms what anyone who knows anything about this case already knows, Mark was a lot closer to Jeffrey than he's let on. Theres a good Crazy Days and Nights video on Mark I'll try to find that goes into his real estate shit and Jeffrey's connection to it.

Edit: found it
 
Last edited:
I am miles behind on any of this shit, but the thing sticking in my mind about Bill Clinton/Donald Trump shenanigans?
They were both adults. ADULTS!
There must be so many people confused by this.
 
So I started looking through some more of these files, and there are archives of some longer conversations Epstein is having, especially with what seems to one guy he's talking a lot to. I'm trying to figure out who he is, but so far it seems it's not really someone important. Either way, I'm posting this little snippet as it was pretty funny:
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027347.jpg HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027348.jpg
Epstein says he was shown a photo of Macron's boyfriend, goes on joking about it.
 
I love whenever there are implications of Trump doing something gay, the rhetoric against him becomes calling him a dirty fat fag. The people that usually goes nuts over gayness being good and fatness being okay's main insults are that Trump is fat and gay lol. That just always makes me lol.
Yeah, that's always been the case. You know..... Could you imagine if trolls were to run with that? "trump is a terrible leader because he is gay" and they post the democrat smear points. It would kill two birds with one stone. Too bad we are a two party system because a third party would absolutely do that, but any attempt at creating a third party is destroyed by the intel community.
 
Back
Top Bottom