💪 Tough Guys Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Dean Pentel said:
I gotta admit it'll be good either way but I'm hoping he gets any kind of victory in this one.

I mean, fuck, our sides are in for it if that happens but it's a price I'm willing to pay.
Click to expand...
I know fuck all about Burger Law, but this lolsuit has dragged on for how long, now? I can only presume that if Patrick didn't have at least some kind of a case against them they would have told him to get bent a while ago. I suspect the most likely outcome is they pay him to fuck off, but we have all seen how Patrick reacts when faced with a legal judgement that does not coincide with his vision of reality. I'd like to imagine that the City offered to settle last year and Patrick is stubbornly and fatly refusing to accept the hush money because it does not involve every officer of the Milwaukee Police Department personally apologising to him. He is also pushing for a clause requiring them to listen to his lecture on why they are little idiot baby children, and why they are legally obliged not to follow any order that may have come from the current administration.
 
Hitlerswag420 said:
There isn't any direct evidence. It's mainly just:

1. Previous statements calling for the execution of Trump supporters
2. He was off Twitter during the exact time it happened (online directly before and after)
3. Randomly tweeted "Nature is healing" right after it happened with a captain america mask and a flushed face (like he had just showered or done something strenuous
4. Same height and build as the suspect
5. Identical bike seen in background of other photos he took in his house
6. Drive out to his MiL's lakefront cabin that same weekend (to dispose of evidence according to believers)
7. Years prior reported a "burglary" in which no valuables were taken except his gun (and his joke book because the Nazis want to stop him from standup bombings)

I think there are a few others, but nothing approaching evidence that the police could use. I honestly don't think he did it, but if he did, it would explain his brazenness with the later false flags and other crimes he's committed against himself, including possibly swatting.
Click to expand...

Yeah. It’s all circumstantial and coincidental evidence that requires speculation.

While I am still certain a pest told MPD of all of this, I am also sure that whoever looked at it did not find enough concrete evidence to even consider questioning him about it.

Personally I don’t know the full story on Tramell and he could have had other enemies.

Plus Fatrick isn’t unknown to the police there, even before all the Swattings, they apparently visited him over the niggeroni Craigslist advert.
That and I should think he has had drunken conversations, while stumbling around looking for cheesesteaks after hooligans threw him out.

They probably don’t have him high on their lists of dangerous people. At least not dangerous to other people.
 
I've never seen anyone mention it, so maybe I'm just retarded, but the Trammell shooter looks like he's wearing two layers of clothing, creating the diaper ass look. You know, so he could ditch the outer layer to throw off the fuzz. If I'm right, that seems like the additional complication that would appeal to a certified genius like Rick.
 
Alex Jones' Fancy Cat said:
I've never seen anyone mention it, so maybe I'm just retarded, but the Trammell shooter looks like he's wearing two layers of clothing creating the diaper ass look. You know, so he could ditch the outer layer to throw off the fuzz. If I'm right, that seems like the additional complication that would appeal to a certified genius like Rick.
Click to expand...

Absolutely that’s possible.

Whoever it was clearly had gone to some effort to cover up, so an extra layer of clothing is certainly possible.

Or he might just have shit himself?
 
Entomologist said:
I know fuck all about Burger Law, but this lolsuit has dragged on for how long, now?
Click to expand...
It's actually pretty normal for a case that at least one judge has found not to be completely frivolous. I actually tend to agree. Just instantly responding to obviously bogus SWAT calls with full force is pretty much bullshit.

I wouldn't mind him winning on that. I mean I would mind that it was Rick personally, but the precedent would be good.

There's actually a case called Hope v. Pelzer that is relevant to this (and has been cited by Rick's lawyers). Now, 1983 makes it possible to pierce qualified immunity if the officer violated "clearly established law." That's a very broad standard, and allows a lot of bullshit.

But in Hope v. Pelzer, the prison punished the plaintiff by just putting him on a "hitching post" like an animal and left him outside in intense heat. The defense basically argued no big deal, there's no specific case of a man being tortured by being put on a hitching post.

SCOTUS found no, you can't just physically torture prisoners for fun and claim the fact you found some novel measure of physical torture makes physical torture okay, since doing that is against clearly established law.

Treating absolutely obviously bogus SWAT calls as being legitimate and reacting to them that way actually should be prohibited.

So I'm in a position where while I absolutely hate this fat faggot with bitch tits, he may actually have a point in this case.

However, I do have a really favorite scenario here. The "clearly established law" part. Breaching qualified immunity requires that the officer actually had "clearly established law" to follow.

So 1983 cases sometimes result in the plaintiff having the court find that their rights were actually violated, as Rick's rights may have been, but it wasn't "clearly established law," so the "winner" of the case has it found that his rights were violated, the law enforcement officers responsible violated his rights, but it wasn't "clearly established" so he loses and gets jack-shit, but future litigants can cite his case.

This would be the most hilarious possible outcome.
 
FinnSven said:
Absolutely that’s possible.

Whoever it was clearly had gone to some effort to cover up, so an extra layer of clothing is certainly possible.

Or he might just have shit himself?
Click to expand...
The shooter looks like an obvious black man to me, and I have doubts that I would ever mistake Pat for a black person
 
Accidental Protege said:
The shooter looks like an obvious black man to me, and I have doubts that I would ever mistake Pat for a black person
Click to expand...

Well he can’t risk falling in his own grinder.

Plus Nikki wouldn’t let him fart in her vagina.

Granted, a black guy outspokenly supporting Trump, especially back then, would have enraged certain black people, so probably this is the route that any investigation went down.
 
I think that the blue sky people are just using this an excuse. Rick is just an extremely hateable fat faggot with bitch tits narcissisticic loser, but lefties always need a specific moral political reason to hate someone. They can’t just say “this dudes an ugly annoying faggot”.

The amount of vitriolic hate he’s getting for his rather banal post about how he doesn’t get as much engagement there and would like jewsky to compete with twitter is crazy, I think it’s actually just about his overall shitty personality and hate ability.
Alex Jones' Fancy Cat said:
I've never seen anyone mention it, so maybe I'm just retarded, but the Trammell shooter looks like he's wearing two layers of clothing, creating the diaper ass look. You know, so he could ditch the outer layer to throw off the fuzz. If I'm right, that seems like the additional complication that would appeal to a certified genius like Rick.
Click to expand...
hey europoor, in America we all do that in case we shart the first pair of pants and underwear
 
Accidental Protege said:
The shooter looks like an obvious black man to me, and I have doubts that I would ever mistake Pat for a black person
Click to expand...
If you zoom in you can see white skin and white people hair on the back of the head. There were dark socks and a mask used to conceal the identity but it’s definitely not a black man. I unironically believe it’s him, he posted a lot of unhinged things about violence against trump supporters being morally correct.
IMG_4105.jpeg
 
Accidental Protege said:
The shooter looks like an obvious black man to me, and I have doubts that I would ever mistake Pat for a black person
Click to expand...
You sure about that? I've seen quite a number of posters on just this thread call him a derogatory and racist dog whistle slur that begins with the letter n, so I think quite a number of people believe him to be an African American.
 
Ken Jennings and Brian Keene had just twisted Pigman’s bitch nipples for drizzles of Bud Light again :story:
IMG_7570.jpeg
IMG_7573.png IMG_7572.png IMG_7571.png

edit: i get it, im late, but, oh well.
 
Last edited:
FinnSven said:
Granted, a black guy outspokenly supporting Trump, especially back then, would have enraged certain black people, so probably this is the route that any investigation went down.
Click to expand...
Just after the shooting, the cops did describe the suspect as a black male, but they conspicuously dropped that part in later descriptions.

There were also pics posted on Facebook of a masked black guy following Trammell around with a sign that read "SIKE" while Trammell was holding a pro-Trump sign, so he definitely had his detractors in the black community.

Given how common black-on-black violence is, it makes sense that the cops would go after the usual suspects first. But something that's always rubbed me wrong about the niggers did it explanation is just how rare black-on-black political violence seems to be. For all the true crime slop I've consumed, I genuinely can't think of a single case where a nog killed another nog over an abstract concept like politics.

What's almost guaranteed is that the killer lived, probably still lives, in the area, and that he was overweight and a coward who couldn't even face his victim before murdering him. Criminal profilers might describe such a person as a fat faggot with bitch tits.
 
What Tomlinson 2026 needs is a lolsuit resolution
Hopefully a losing one
Although if he wins and gets nigger rich and an even more inflated ego it could be better content in the long run
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom