- Joined
- Nov 24, 2024
Oh no, how will I ever recover after this? My days of being sexist are over!
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 118 | Oct 14, 2026 | ORDER re 116 Motion for Reconsideration. For the foregoing reasons, the Court corrects statements in its Oct. 2 Decision regarding A.M. v. City of New York and otherwise denies Defendants Reconsideration Letter. The Court directs the Clerk of Co urt to transfer this case to the District Court for the Southern District of California. The Court waives the provision of Local Rule 83.1 which requires a seven-day stay due to the parties consent to the transfer. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/15/2026. (HDS) | |
| — | Oct 14, 2026 | Case transferred to District of Southern District of California. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE.( Extract Civil Case due by 10/22/2026.) (CCF) | |
| — | Oct 14, 2026 | ||
| 117 | Oct 8, 2026 | RESPONSE in Opposition re [116] Amended MOTION for Reconsideration re [114] Order, limited to the Memorandum & Order's statement that A.M. v. City of New York does not exist and is a fabricated AI hallucination; the decision exists (2022 WL 20472225, E.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 202, [115] Letter MOTION for Reconsideration re [114] Order, limited to the Memorandum & Order's statement that A.M. v. City of New York does not exist and is a fabricated AI hallucination; the decision exists (2022 WL 20472225, E.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2022 filed by Alyssa Mercante. (Green, Remy) | |
| 116 | Oct 4, 2026 | Amended MOTION for Reconsideration re [114] Order, limited to the Memorandum & Order's statement that A.M. v. City of New York does not exist and is a fabricated AI hallucination; the decision exists (2022 WL 20472225, E.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2022) and was filed in full at ECF No. 90-3; Defendant requests correction of that statement and reconsideration of the Rule 11 determination to the extent it rests on that citation by Jeff Tarzia. (Attachments: (1) Exhibit A.M. v. City of New York, 2022 WL 20472225 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2022), (2) Exhibit A.M. v. City of New York, 2022 WL 20472225 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2022)) (Coleman, Ronald) | 1 2 3 |