📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[Shig O'nella]

Some guy is trying to argue that Terry Pratchett would be in favor of trans rights because his daughter said so. Therefore she's the ultimate arbiter of what her dead father's opinion would have been on a modern issue that wasn't as prevalent while he was alive. I find it somewhat repulsive when children try to live through their parents legacies and project their own beliefs as what their parents would have believed.
View attachment 2412760
Archive | Link

Spoiler: Images

View attachment 2412761
View attachment 2412763

Let me think a second ...

The guy who wrote such characters as Cherry Littlebottom, Jeffery, Eskerina Smith, Gladys, Sergeant Jackrum and Queen Blodwen is gender critical?

Nah - I'm gonna believe the daughter on this one. Don't care, still like his books anyway.

 

[palmtreesalad]

I'm so glad r/mtf is back because it gives us gems like this:

View attachment 2411596
(x)

Spoiler: Bonus gender tiktoks

Tell me more about bunself pronouns, I'm fascinated:
vid1.mp4

Tell me you have no real problems without telling me you have no real problems:
vid2.mp4

The girl describing being gender fluid just sounds like she has multiple personality disorder. I don't think going to bed and switching into "Michael" is something a mentally healthy person goes through.

 

[Moby Dork]

Some guy is trying to argue that Terry Pratchett would be in favor of trans rights because his daughter said so. Therefore she's the ultimate arbiter of what her dead father's opinion would have been on a modern issue that wasn't as prevalent while he was alive. I find it somewhat repulsive when children try to live through their parents legacies and project their own beliefs as what their parents would have believed.
View attachment 2412760
Archive | Link

Spoiler: Images

View attachment 2412761
View attachment 2412763

Why does it matter what a dead writer would think?

Maybe we should dust off the ol' Ouija Board and ask a bunch of other dead writers what they think too.

 

[Retired Junta Member]

Let me think a second ...

The guy who wrote such characters as Cherry Littlebottom, Jeffery, Eskerina Smith, Gladys, Sergeant Jackrum and Queen Blodwen is gender critical?

Nah - I'm gonna believe the daughter on this one. Don't care, still like his books anyway.

He definitely supported trans rights.
However, like many left leaning old people, he never actually lived or saw certain things in real life. When we say: X or Y would have supported this, we’re making a claim based on supposition and nothing more.

not that it matters anyway.

 

[Shig O'nella]

He definitely supported trans rights.
However, like many left leaning old people, he never actually lived or saw certain things in real life. When we say: X or Y would have supported this, we’re making a claim based on supposition and nothing more.

not that it matters anyway.

True. We could speculate til the Tranch makes a profit and be none the wiser, cause ouija boards are the only way to get an actual answer and they don't work.
Just struck me as amusing that people are now using an (admittedly gentle and charming) author as an authority figure to appeal to.

 

[Surfin Terf]

Some guy is trying to argue that Terry Pratchett would be in favor of trans rights because his daughter said so. Therefore she's the ultimate arbiter of what her dead father's opinion would have been on a modern issue that wasn't as prevalent while he was alive. I find it somewhat repulsive when children try to live through their parents legacies and project their own beliefs as what their parents would have believed.
View attachment 2412760
Archive | Link

Spoiler: Images

View attachment 2412761
View attachment 2412763

I'd heard about the Terry Pratchett GC/GI fight before, but I didn't know any details. Still can't say much about the fight, but based on this clearly pro-tranny article it sounds like basically Neil Gaiman jumped on the anti-TERF train, got shat on and compared negatively to Terry Pratchett, and now TRAs are the ones claiming Pratchett as one of their own. He very well might have been, on the other hand he very well might have gone the route of Graham Lineham. We can't say, but I agree with Sarah Ditum here, this argument is at best pointless and at worst disrespectful to Pratchett.

However, I will say that in the past I have defended Neil Gaiman for not publicly disavowing his father for being the head of the UK Church of Scientology. Not because I support Scientology (I don't, it's a dangerous cult), not because I think that what David Gaiman did was A-OK (it wasn't, not by a long shot). I defended him because it's not Neil's responsibility to answer for the sins of the father, but if he can stick his nose in this sensitive political issue then he can damn well answer for why he never publicly disavowed his father, something that could have literally saved lives.

So, Neil Gaiman, what do you have to say about your father's role in organizing an attempt to infiltrate and corrupt US Government files on Scientology?

 

[NoReturn]

Ongo Bongo tribe

More like Oingo Boingo tribe

These are my private things​

There they are against the wall​

The dirty pictures, religious objects​

These are my private things​

Come and get them out of here​

 

[Cr1ms0n_&_C10v3r]

Some guy is trying to argue that Terry Pratchett would be in favor of trans rights because his daughter said so. Therefore she's the ultimate arbiter of what her dead father's opinion would have been on a modern issue that wasn't as prevalent while he was alive. I find it somewhat repulsive when children try to live through their parents legacies and project their own beliefs as what their parents would have believed.
View attachment 2412760
Archive | Link

Spoiler: Images

View attachment 2412761
View attachment 2412763

Who tf thinks this is actually important? If you're dead you don't have to deal with crazy stinky troons policing your speech in law, getting you fired or socially ostracised, threatening to beat you up, wasting your medical resources, waving their cocks in your face and all around being a stain on humanity.
Arguing about a dead person's hypothetical view of troons if they were alive is the ultimate petty Twitter baby pissing contest. You may as well be debating what Batman would think of trannies if he were real.

 

[Stalfler]

View attachment 2412708
View attachment 2412701
He deadnamed HIMSELF in his own fundraiser

i just searched and found their facebook and i’m 99% sure they’re lying about changing their name unless the JUST NOW did it.

 

[behindyourightnow]

I once met a woman who was convinced that she could pass as both male and female (she couldn't). She often posted online about using a "deep voice" in certain situations ( her voice never noticeably changed in the situations she remarked on). She thought that she could freak out men by switching to a deep voice (she couldn't).
It's wild how they zero in on tiny non-changes that aren't noticeable to anyone but themselves.

I think most women could conceivably put on a 'passing' low voice way more easier than the other way round. It would require a lot of practice though, probably doing a lot of vocal fry exercises to increase your comfortable lower range and that sort of thing. There is a limit to how much that would work, and they wouldn't sound like James Earl Jones, but they could probably eventually pass as a male with an average/somewhat high voice.

Margaret Thatcher for example took voice lessons and was able to permanently and naturally lower the pitch of her voice (not to sound like a man, but to sound more authoritative) and it's not uncommon for women who do a lot of public speaking to do the same thing, even if it's not talked about much. Female voices in general are also naturally lower today in most English-speaking countries than they were a generation ago, because a lot of it is based on unconscious imitation and habit.

On the contrary, I have never heard a man doing a 'female' voice that sounds like anything but a cartoon, even if they technically can get the pitch right. I guess virilization of the vocal cords is a bitch, or maybe they just never put in the effort.

Maybe I should not have written this though, because I am pretty certain that the last time I wrote about female voice stuff in this thread Kevin Gibes read it and then used the information (incorrectly) as part of an anecdote he told on Twitter.

 

[Captain Smollett]

In her book description, she is also listed as the "the Director of Art & Culture of Trans-Latinx DMV", I searched it up and the site looks just like her other ones (ugly).

I looked through the site and couldn't find Xemi listed, so either he left or it hasn't been updated considering the whole Ms/Mr thing dates to 2018-2019.
PDFs might take a while since I don't want to outright give money to this pedophile, and I will have to go through cache pages of deleted posts or the archive of the Nawat groups since he went on either a mass deletion or hidden them. If you want to assist please feel free to send me a message!

Gofundme he made after being called out for child abuse

EDIT:
Possible address?

Also, enjoy a video of him playing the flute.

 

[A Very Big Fish]

I think most women could conceivably put on a 'passing' low voice way more easier than the other way round. It would require a lot of practice though, probably doing a lot of vocal fry exercises to increase your comfortable lower range and that sort of thing. There is a limit to how much that would work, and they wouldn't sound like James Earl Jones, but they could probably eventually pass as a male with an average/somewhat high voice.

Margaret Thatcher for example took voice lessons and was able to permanently and naturally lower the pitch of her voice (not to sound like a man, but to sound more authoritative) and it's not uncommon for women who do a lot of public speaking to do the same thing, even if it's not talked about much. Female voices in general are also naturally lower today in most English-speaking countries than they were a generation ago, because a lot of it is based on unconscious imitation and habit.

On the contrary, I have never heard a man doing a 'female' voice that sounds like anything but a cartoon, even if they technically can get the pitch right. I guess virilization of the vocal cords is a bitch, or maybe they just never put in the effort.

Maybe I should not have written this though, because I am pretty certain that the last time I wrote about female voice stuff in this thread Kevin Gibes read it and then used the information (incorrectly) as part of an anecdote he told on Twitter.

I've heard a guy do a really good impression of a woman. He said its less about pitch and more about what part of the mouth and pallette are used. I don't understand it, I'm a dummy. But most people only think about the pitch.

 

[Amber the Hedgehog]

Who tf thinks this is actually important? If you're dead you don't have to deal with crazy stinky troons policing your speech in law, getting you fired or socially ostracised, threatening to beat you up, wasting your medical resources, waving their cocks in your face and all around being a stain on humanity.
Arguing about a dead person's hypothetical view of troons if they were alive is the ultimate petty Twitter baby pissing contest. You may as well be debating what Batman would think of trannies if he were real.

I think it's because of new the Watch series very loosely based on his books that changed the gender, personality, or origins of characters, and removing some characters completely. One of these changes being tranny related thing.

In the original books there were dwarf women that rebelled their culture by dressing noticeably feminine manner. Dwarfs supposed to be dwarfs first so much that acknowledging gender was taboo and these ladies thought that wasn't right. That to be said these rebellious women were still dwarfs and so didn't do exactly most traditional femmes. Like they didn't shave but rather wove flowers into their beards. It was a mostly a background thing that poked fun on a fantasy trope and real world gender politics. So very Pratchett writing but the new series to suit the current year PC culture changed this. I'm lazy so just quoting Screenrant's explanation on the changes.

In The Watch, Constable Cheery is played by non-binary actor Jo Eaton-Kent and appears to be human - lacking the trademark beard and short stature of dwarfs. According to the character description, Cheery is an "ingenious non-binary forensics expert, ostracized by their kin and finding a new home and identity." Their gender identity is effectively a reversal of the book version of Cheery Littlebottom, who comes from a non-binary culture but rebels by identifying as a woman. In Pratchett's books, all dwarfs are assumed to be male and it's nearly impossible to tell otherwise, given their many layers of clothing and ubiquitous beards.

When Cheery is first introduced she, like all female dwarfs, is effectively in the closet and goes by he/him pronouns. However, through her friendship with Angua she gains the confidence to call herself a woman, asking people to pronounce her name "Cheri" and adopting other feminine quirks (though she keeps the beard). Many traditional-minded dwarfs are outraged by this behavior, but some of the younger female dwarfs begin following Cheery's example. Given that non-binary gender identities have only recently begun breaking into mainstream media (and have been the subject of backlash), this could serve as a timely update of Cheery's radical and game-changing gender politics from the Discworld books.

 

[Yangon]

I think it's because of new the Watch series very loosely based on his books that changed the gender, personality, or origins of characters, and removing some characters completely. One of these changes being tranny related thing.

In the original books there were dwarf women that rebelled their culture by dressing noticeably feminine manner. Dwarfs supposed to be dwarfs first so much that acknowledging gender was taboo and these ladies thought that wasn't right. That to be said these rebellious women were still dwarfs and so didn't do exactly most traditional femmes. Like they didn't shave but rather wove flowers into their beards. It was a mostly a background thing that poked fun on a fantasy trope and real world gender politics. So very Pratchett writing but the new series to suit the current year PC culture changed this. I'm lazy so just quoting Screenrant's explanation on the changes.

I haven't read his books so correct me if I'm wrong, but basically Pratchett satirized dwarves in fantasy always being bearded males by creating a female dwarf, and they completely disregarded that and turned her into some genderspecial non-binary?

 

[Surfin Terf]

I think most women could conceivably put on a 'passing' low voice way more easier than the other way round. It would require a lot of practice though, probably doing a lot of vocal fry exercises to increase your comfortable lower range and that sort of thing. There is a limit to how much that would work, and they wouldn't sound like James Earl Jones, but they could probably eventually pass as a male with an average/somewhat high voice.

Margaret Thatcher for example took voice lessons and was able to permanently and naturally lower the pitch of her voice (not to sound like a man, but to sound more authoritative) and it's not uncommon for women who do a lot of public speaking to do the same thing, even if it's not talked about much. Female voices in general are also naturally lower today in most English-speaking countries than they were a generation ago, because a lot of it is based on unconscious imitation and habit.

On the contrary, I have never heard a man doing a 'female' voice that sounds like anything but a cartoon, even if they technically can get the pitch right. I guess virilization of the vocal cords is a bitch, or maybe they just never put in the effort.

Maybe I should not have written this though, because I am pretty certain that the last time I wrote about female voice stuff in this thread Kevin Gibes read it and then used the information (incorrectly) as part of an anecdote he told on Twitter.

I can think of only one male who does a good girl voice.

Don’t know how well his advice would work for anything less stereotypical than a Valley Girl voice.

I think it's because of new the Watch series very loosely based on his books that changed the gender, personality, or origins of characters, and removing some characters completely. One of these changes being tranny related thing.

In the original books there were dwarf women that rebelled their culture by dressing noticeably feminine manner. Dwarfs supposed to be dwarfs first so much that acknowledging gender was taboo and these ladies thought that wasn't right. That to be said these rebellious women were still dwarfs and so didn't do exactly most traditional femmes. Like they didn't shave but rather wove flowers into their beards. It was a mostly a background thing that poked fun on a fantasy trope and real world gender politics. So very Pratchett writing but the new series to suit the current year PC culture changed this. I'm lazy so just quoting Screenrant's explanation on the changes.

What set it off was Neil Gaiman saying that he figures GCs to be antisemitic.

 

[Unpaid Emotional Labourer]

Women nearly kill themselves trying to transform back into 20-year-old women and these genetic rejects think they can turn a hairy man-bod into Princess Leia, either because they think actual women are too lazy and stupid to stay 20 forever, or because they have porn-blinders on and can't even see that women continue to exist (and look) past college-age.

They really do think the only reason we don’t look 20 and hot forever is laziness lol. Like dude, I used to be a hot 20-yo woman. If *I* cannot be that again, how on Earth are you, a middle aged man who isn’t even a pretty boy type in the least, going to accomplish it?

 

[Amber the Hedgehog]

I haven't read his books so correct me if I'm wrong, but basically Pratchett satirized dwarves in fantasy always being bearded males by creating a female dwarf, and they completely disregarded that and turned her into some genderspecial non-binary?

Female dwafs being bearded pops up time to time in fantasy. I'm not 100% sure but I think Tolkien was one them. As it came across to me as a casual Discworld reader who read few books here and there out of order, it was a mostly good natured parody of feminism and generational culture clash.

 

[sanguis draconis]

I looked through the site and couldn't find Xemi listed, so either he left or it hasn't been updated

Their Facebook page has a post with him in 2018, also the books that describe him as "Director of Art & Culture" are from 2018 also so either he left he isn't that important lmao

That description also says he is "a Resident at EarthStar Two-Spirit Nation", I tried to search it up and founmd this article from the same time period, he says his partner Ahanu is "a Kainai non-binary persxn". I have tried googling and this pasty white girl does not look even a little bit like anyone else from that tribe, like not even remotely. The article itself is super contradictory saying "historically two-spirit were part of indigenous society, but colonialism ruined it, but also, many indigenous societies did not support it" so really you could say it's "colonialist" to force comunities thatb were against it to suddenly embrace it if you wanted to go down that rode.

That Ahanu girl is so obviously a fake though that I do want to dig deeper, and Xenu has really made himself part of a bunch of groups (plus apparently works with "youth", which considering the "forcing baby to suck his nips" I am not a fan).

 

[behindyourightnow]

I've heard a guy do a really good impression of a woman. He said its less about pitch and more about what part of the mouth and pallette are used. I don't understand it, I'm a dummy. But most people only think about the pitch.

That makes sense. I was wondering why it is so rare considering that male singers with low voices can usually do high notes far more easily than vice versa. But when it comes to 'imitating females' in general most MtFs seem incapable of actual imitation, and in fact they don't even seem that interested. They just go with their idea of female voices and actions, and end up looking and sounding like faggots (I don't even mean that word as an insult to gay men, I mean they literally resemble straight men imitating gay men in a mocking way).

I am not sure how much of it is laziness and how much is just being incapable of seeing women as anything but objects of their fetish.

Then again, it is not even just AGPs. That gay actor that 'came out as trans' recently released a publicity video announcing his transition, and it was literally just him wearing a dress and high heels and mincing around like a stereotype of a gay hairdresser. I was going to write 'like a drag queen' but actually most drag queens do a better job than he did.

Do these busted middle aged dudes really think they'll be able to transition into 20 year old women with enough drugs?

Everyone here is being far too optimistic talking about 20 year old women. I think many of them want to be a lot younger than that.

 

[Da Grim Reaper]

Troons and unpronounceable Irish names. Name a more iconic duo...
Other than troons and harassing women
Or troons and threatening suicide
Or troons and empty cans of soda on their bedroom floor
Or troons and programming
Or troons and Dungeons and Dragons
Or troons and anime
Or troons and dressing like a prostitute
Or...[continue listing things that troons like to do]

Fucking trannies I can't even learn some STEM without being connected to them