The Great Twitter Meltdown of 2021 - Emulator creator Byuu bullied to death by HateSpeech™ forum, Twitter takes up arms (Still No Death Report)

[Rungle]

How many times have you seen a proof of death posted for literally anyone on Earth? Just sayin'.

literally everyone with a family tree

 

[Radola Gajda]

I would not be suprised If @Wayne Beckett Is "dead" legendary emulator genius himself.
Seething , because people here doesnt believe story. And ask questions.


One last thing about urn, some autists burned their money by DDOSing farms.
So it is pretty possible same or different group of autists decided to buy Urn to own kiwis.

I am pretty sure I speak not only for myself but for many farmers as well.
I didnt know nothing about guy and never heard of him until he joined 41%. So even if there is undisputable proof tomorrow . I am not going to feel any guilt

 

[AnOminous]

View attachment 2377848
(source) / (archive)

Near's employer was no longer trustworthy once it became clear that he was the same one parading around a photo of his dead friend's urn on a cyberbullying site and then verbatim "congratulating" us for killing him.

It's really not hard Hector. All we want is literally one other person that isn't the aforementioned urn-parader or the guy that apparently listened for half an hour and did nothing as his 'friend' hung himself. Literally one other person that isn't you two. Why does everything about this lead back to you two?

What goalposts is this moron talking about? From day one it's been "where's the death certificate?" "Where's the obituary?" And instead we have everything but what would actually prove something. We have a couple dancing faggots and their bullshit carnival. And apparently in Clown World, even a "journalist's" standard of proof is apparently "just trust me bro."

enIf Near is dead, this thread is btfo'd by an emutranny from beyond the grave

Not really. If he turns out dead, he had really shitty "friends." In fact, he insisted he had no friends to Null, and considering Hector just sat idly by and did nothing while he died, waiting until he was good and dead to hang up the phone, he appears to have been correct. Whatever this guy is, he was no friend. With "friends" like Hector you, well, end up dead, apparently.

So even if there is undisputable proof tomorrow . I am not going to feel any guilt

I wouldn't believe anyone else is dead tomorrow if the same shit happened based on the level of bullshit here. It would be easy to prove this shit if it were true, so if the only people in a position to prove it are deliberately jerking us around with bullshit, that's really on them.

 

[AnOminous]

How many times have you seen a proof of death posted for literally anyone on Earth? Just sayin'.

Plenty of times. Including once an autopsy report I obtained myself. I've also attended funerals. Pretty sure the people in the coffins weren't alive. If they were, well, they wouldn't have been for very long.

 

[Kiwisee]

Hector if you’re reading this:

It was me!

I was the one who wrote down Byuu’s name in the KiwiFarms’ Death Note. And then I personally made sure to frame Josh for it!

 

[LocalFireDept]

Not really. If he turns out dead, he had really shitty "friends." In fact, he insisted he had no friends to Null, and considering Hector just sat idly by and did nothing while he died, waiting until he was good and dead to hang up the phone, he appears to have been correct. Whatever this guy is, he was no friend. With "friends" like Hector you, well, end up dead, apparently.

Nah you’d still be btfo’d by Casper the Super Mario trannyghost and it would be funny as fuck

 

[heavycream]

View attachment 2377848

POST THE OBITUARY.​

 

[Terence Trent D'ARPA]

Hector should stick to developing the Apple M1 port of Linux instead of gay ops.
He will lose all credibility doing this. Why does he keep going? Anyone in the know or with some basic common sense about the internet knows he’s full of shit.
He must be getting paid 120k for this

I would not be surprised if Hector Martin ultimately shelves the M1 port, claiming harassment from "Byuu-anon" as the reason. After all, why put in the work on an open source project when you can get the same Twitter acclaim from being yet another KF victim?

We'll get another round of press again, and maybe Mr. Martin can crowdfund a trip to Aruba for much needed "self care." After all, Byuu would have wanted it that way:

"Near was always a big fan of Natalee Holloway, and spreading his ashes on the port in Oranjestad would help bring closure to this whole ordeal. Of course, the conspiracy theorists at the Kiwi Farms probably don't think she's dead, either!"

 

[Cool Dog]

The sheer volume of concentrated Autism these people possess mean they could, if they put their minds to it, accomplish wonderful things. The tragedy is that they've chosen, instead, to do a path of selfishness that justifies them being a dick to people, and in the process, become the nemesis of anyone who even tangentially disagrees with them.

You're assuming all these people are as talented as byuu is when in reality most are less than useless and have no talent whatsoever. Couple that with mental illness and incurable lazyness and you get these mediocre fucks who barely do anything at all and when trying something they give up almost immediately, they have zero drive except to bitch and moan on their little echochambers. When they do something they halfass it, its always the least amount of effort with these "people", just look at john "wu-man" flynt's shitty game which he even paid other people to do yet he was so lazy he couldnt even do basic quality control

somebody doxed another Kiwi and posted her child pornography in chat and he missed it. Shameful.

What?

 

[Humbert Humbert]

Thread on Martin when?

 

[Wolpertinger]

I was checking on Martin's twitter for a quick second and I managed to screencap this before it suddenly disappeared.
View attachment 2378060
Couldn't grab the original link, but I believe it was in response to this:
https://twitter.com/Catpin8/status/1419225267696934917 (https://archive.md/1atU5)

That tweet + the one he made about Near not wanting any donations made "in his memory" both reek of Hector knowing Near isn't dead. Most people would be happy to have charities or donations made to their cause in their name, but just like with fake cancer Go-Fund Me's, I'm sure collecting money in memory of a dead person would lead to quite a bit of trouble if it ever comes out that the dead person isn't actually, ya'know...dead.

Also is it just me, or is it odd that everybody is acting like this Wayne Beckett shit is normal? I'm damn sure if I was allegedly bullied to death by shitheads online, my former employer would not make an account on the site that did it, under their full name, and then have their first post be "Congratulations" with a picture of my ashes.

 

[Mister Mint]

POST THE OBITUARY.​

I hate being Admiral TinfoilHat, but I don't even know if this is going to do it for me anymore.

Do newspapers confirm death before printing or just print up a paragraph on anybody you tell them is dead?

The only compelling thing that makes me think he might be dead isn't any of the "proof" we've been given but the fact that we now know his real name. That seems like setting off a nuke in your home to kill a gnat, but none of this plan was very sound either way so I don't know.

 

[Least Concern]

Yes. The common nickname is "citogenesis". A claim is inserted into a wikipedia page, either maliciously or because of something a "trusted" publication said about the subject. That claim is then reported as "fact" by other "trusted" publications, which are they used as citations for the "fact" in the wikipedia page in turn. The "fact" is now deemed "truth" and can't be removed because of the multiple citations supporting its inclusion.

This wouldn't quite be citogenesis, though, since the source of USA Today's article is not Wikipedia itself. A poorly-researched or blatantly-false news article being used as a source for Wikipedia uncritically is a flaw, but not citogenesis.

Ok, so there is the confirmation that David is, in fact, alive. Thanks Hector!

I'm pretty sure that tweet was referring to another time byuu had "gone away" for a while and not this time.

Mr. Martin, if you're still reading, I think I should note that I actually praised you in another thread the other day for bringing light to that Muse Group guy's threats to that developer from China. I also think the work you're doing unraveling the M1 is interesting and of great potential benefit to FOSS OS users in the future. You might hate me but I don't hate you. That's why I'm willing to be convinced, if you can convince me, of what an asshole I am. Go for it.

 

[CervixHammer]

Also is it just me, or is it odd that everybody is acting like this Wayne Beckett shit is normal? I'm damn sure if I was allegedly bullied to death by shitheads online, my former employer would not make an account on the site that did it, under their full name, and then have their first post be "Congratulations" with a picture of my ashes.

"I absolutely refuse to post a photo of David's dead body so you guys can jerk off to it!" was a hell of a thing to say unprompted.
that felt like the part of a LARP where the OP is getting bored and wants to wrap things up. I was surprised when he didn't follow it up with some kind of "fine you sickos here it is!" post with a spoilered old shock image, like lemon party or goatse within 20 minutes.

 

[totallyrandomusername]

I will trust it is actually Byuu in the cookie jar if Wayne Beckett is willing to take a big heaping tablespoon of what is in the cookie jar with a video showing him putting it in his mouth, chewing, and swallowing.

 

[Mister Mint]

"I absolutely refuse to post a photo of David's dead body so you guys can jerk off to it!" was a hell of a thing to say unprompted.
that felt like the part of a LARP where the OP is getting bored and wants to wrap things up. I was surprised when he didn't follow it up with some kind of "fine you sickos here it is!" post with a spoilered old shock image, like lemon party or goatse within 20 minutes.

Why would you even have it? Did you take a picture of your dead friend or did the police give them out as souvenirs?

 

[Peal]

Regarding the urn: You could probably contact the alibaba seller of that specific style of urn to get it customized with whatever text you wanted. I'd bet that's exactly what this Wayne fellow did. If he is dead it's pretty disrespectful to choose such a cheap urn and tacky font.

 

[tofu meatsticks]

OK, Hector, I'll bite.

I'll believe Near offed himself if you accept the reason why this is a situation people here are still commenting on is because Near tried to extort the site admin into taking down his original 13-page thread in which he gave said admin less than a full day to comply (after Near was told that legal counsel was needed before anything was done).

Near attempted this out of nowhere - his thread wasn't even recently active at the time that he chose to email. In fact, when the thread was active, Near made an account and posted saying he was ok with the thread. In the handful of offsite interactions Near had with people here, it came down to comp sci nerd one-upmanship that Near seemed entertained by.

You see, the problem isn't conspiratorial mindsets and groupthink the way you think it is. It's almost like we have every reason to be suspicious of Near and his motivations with regards to his choices.

I can even accept that Near had a change of heart about the thread and wanted it taken down. However, accusing us of disregarding truth is covering up the fact that

• If Near did sudoku, he wasn't pushed by the users in that thread to do so, and the content of those original 13 pages, even if he had a change of heart surrounding it, could have been left in the past and ignored, and it likely would have continued to be a dead thread, considering Near seemed to be savvy enough about being online that he could have been choosy about what he posted in the future to avoid being posted about.
• If Near did sudoku, he made himself do it. If his bottom line was "I'm going to kill myself if I can't get that thread taken down", it could have been any other bottom line he chose - someone at the point of wanting to commit suicide can blame it on whatever they want, but it's ultimately their own doing.

Hector - you're pushing a narrative that KiwiFarms Kills People and we MADE HIM do it, and you're conveniently leaving out the context that the real story is suspicious as fuck.

Let's say KF successfully got eradicated from the internet - there will always be websites that follow always-online personalities. If it's not KF, if it's not Lolcow, if it's not 4chan, if it's not the PULL forums, if it's not fucking Tumblr and Facebook groups, it's going to be another website.

So Near took aim at KF on his way out, for whatever reason he had. If he was really to the point of killing himself because of the thread existing, then I feel sorry for him, but as Near stated, he believed he was beyond help of doctors and therapists and medication. He believed, for whatever reason, that he was beyond help. If he committed suicide, he was in a place where only he could have helped himself, but he chose otherwise, and decided to make it splashy on the way out.

Still doesn't mean we harassed him to death, as you seem to want the wider internet to believe.

 

[MirnaMinkoff]

I hate being Admiral TinfoilHat, but I don't even know if this is going to do it for me anymore.

Do newspapers confirm death before printing or just print up a paragraph on anybody you tell them is dead?

The only compelling thing that makes me think he might be dead isn't any of the "proof" we've been given but the fact that we now know his real name. That seems like setting off a nuke in your home to kill a gnat, but none of this plan was very sound either way so I don't know.

Yes, newspapers require a death certificate to run an obit. (You can run a “in memory of” type paid ad without providing any proof) To many pranksters and insurance scammers out there to take someone’s word on the matter, which means little low budget daily newspaper obit sections have higher standards for proof than USA Today.

I can’t say it would hard to fool a Ohio newspaper by sending them a fake PDF in moonspeak and assuring them it’s a legit death certificate. They are accustomed to dealing with death certificate issued by American ME and doctors, not international paperwork. I’m sure the nice woman named Brenda who runs the obit section isn’t a ball breaker nor speaks fluent Japanese so might not be hard to convince her.

 

[Mister Mint]

Yes, newspapers require a death certificate to run an obit. (You can run a “in memory of” type paid ad without providing any proof) To many pranksters and insurance scammers out there to take someone’s word on the matter, which means little low budget daily newspaper obit sections have higher standards for proof than USA Today.

I can’t say it would hard to fool a Ohio newspaper by sending them a fake PDF in moonspeak and assuring them it’s a legit death certificate. They are accustomed to dealing with death certificate issued by American ME and doctors, not international paperwork. I’m sure the nice woman named Brenda who runs the obit section isn’t a ball breaker nor speaks fluent Japanese so might not be hard to convince her.

If that's the case then I think I'll be pretty okay with a USA obit then. That way even if he is alive I can at least take solace in the fact that there's probably federal laws he'd have to answer to if he faked a death certificate.