Culture Female mob TWERK on ambulance as it tries to get through Juneteenth crowd to reach injured and dying shooting victims in Oakland - The Confederacy was right.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

They were responding to the One dead, several injured after shooting near Juneteenth event in Oakland reported Sunday.

  • A group of women were seen twerking on top of an ambulance in Oakland
  • EMT's were attempting to make their way to the scene of a shooting
  • The emergency vehicle was blocked from progressing by a mob of people
  • Around 1,000 people were gathered in Lake Merritt to celebrate Juneteenth
  • Crowd appeared completely unawares as to the seriousness of the situation
  • Shooting incident saw one person killed and at least seven other were wounded
Multiple women were seen twerking on the top of an ambulance in Lake Merritt in Oakland, California on Saturday night, as paramedics attempted to make their way through to the scene of a shooting in which one person was killed and at least seven others were wounded.

The ambulance was stopped in its tracks by the crowd which was said to be around 1,000-strong as people gathered to celebrate Juneteenth after it was declared a federal holiday.

As the ambulance arrived at the scene, the revelers continued to party, with no apparent regard for the seriousness of the situation that just occurred nearby.

1624371271775.png 1624371297396.png 1624371322634.png

When the ambulance could go no further, at least five women began twerking at the side while another pair jumped on the hood of the emergency vehicle.

At least one person was also spotted on top of the roof at one point.

Video footage of the incident has gone viral on Twitter, showing Juneteenth partiers not only ignoring the Oakland shooting, but using the ambulance as a vehicle for them to use for their own enjoyment.

Police were on the scene to monitor the situation, they announced on Facebook, when shots rang out at 6:22 p.m.

1624371385485.png 1624371410477.png

Six male victims ranging in age from 16 to 27 and one 21-year-old female suffered gunshot wounds, and a 22-year-old San Francisco resident died.

'Immediately after the shooting, Oakland Police Officers observed two men running from the scene with firearms,' the police department announced on Sunday. 'Both men have been arrested and two firearms recovered.'

Police said it remains unclear whether the two individuals are connected to the shooting, and the Oakland Police Department is now offering up to $40,000 for any information about the mass shooting.

Investigators said they were trying to determine a motive for the shooting and identify suspects, but believe it has links to gang activity in neighboring San Francisco.

The shooting occurred shortly before 6:30pm about a mile north of the Lake Merritt Amphitheater, where hundreds of people had gathered throughout the day to commemorate June 19, 1865.

That was the date when Union soldiers brought the news of freedom to enslaved black people in Galveston, Texas, two months after the Confederacy had surrendered.

Andrew Simpson was jogging near the lake when he heard gunshots.

'Out of the corner of my eye I saw a guy with a gun pointing at a car. Everyone started sprinting and screaming,' Simpson told the Bay Area News Group.

Witnesses said some people ran into the water when shots rang out.

'Tonight a joyous occasion at our Lake Merritt was marred by a senseless act of gun violence,' said Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf in a statement.

It wasn't immediately known whether there was any connection between the shooting and the Juneteenth events.

The footage appeared on Tucker Carlson's Fox News program on Monday night who vented his fury at what he had witnessed.

'What kind of society produces people like that who would behave like that? Do you know anybody who would behave like that? When you have people behave like that you have to ask yourself what are we as a society doing wrong?' Carlson pondered.

'Anybody who celebrates a shooting is not somebody you want to share a country with,' he added.

[More pics but you get idea...]
 
When I was a young woman street parties in the Bay Area were safe and fun. I don’t expect anybody to believe me anymore, just put my words in that meme template of the old lady in the wheelchair.

I remember very chill and pretty fun street fairs as a teen. Although admittedly that was in San Jose which has long been less insane than Oakland. It probably helps that San Jose has way more Mexicans and way fewer black people.

Would you expect former slaves to create a functioning society, period? Black communities always had a lower quality of life and lower level of achievement than their white counterparts.

Importing an underclass of foreign barbarians was never going to go well - once the “talented tenth” that held them somewhat together abandoned its own institutions for white ones, constraints on the average member of that group were removed, and moral standards lowered across the board, a fairly-stable underclass became an unstable underclass.

This supports my working theory that the number one impediment to black people (more or less) succeeding is being around other black people.

Even the woke essentially admit this with their fixation on forcing white kids into majority black schools. Black kids don't succeed without a large number of white kids in class since white kids are less disruptive and are willing to be friends with (or at least not bully) black nerds.
 
Would you expect former slaves to create a functioning society, period?
They didn't totally create the society wherein they dwelled, though, so the question is only pertinent to the case of Liberia, where former slaves were shipped off in order to create their own society elsewhere.

Black communities always had a lower quality of life
By what metrics?

and lower level of achievement than their white counterparts.
Someone has to be achieving more, in the first place. Your argument would have a point if you could successfully argue that the black communities were bereft of achievement altogether.

Importing an underclass of foreign barbarians was never going to go well - once the “talented tenth” that held them somewhat together abandoned its own institutions for white ones, constraints on the average member of that group were removed, and moral standards lowered across the board, a fairly-stable underclass became an unstable underclass.
That wasn't your original argument, but this one is still nebulous.

You assume that the talent of a community existed in a distinct group rather than being spread about throughout the communities in both active talent and potential. I would agree that even before the dilapidation of black communities, there was a departure of more talented/resource-bearing blacks from said communities in the wake of desegregation/forced integration, but there is nothing that can be assumed lacking by their departure that provided the "constraints" you mention-- that's mealy-mouthed nonsense. This "talented tenth" largely wasn't governing or otherwise leading these communities, so they weren't in a position to provide any such thing.

Did they provide constraints that, say, kept crime down, or constraints that kept down the illegitimacy rate? If so, what were they and how did they impose them?

Instead, I wager that the "moral standards" were in fact the first line of "constraints" to begin with, which means that "something" distorted their culture, which only further incentivized the fleeing of talent and resources. I argue that it was expanding the welfare state (combined with more lax attitudes about sex), because as done, it disincentivized whole homes (you could make more money from welfare without being married, but you may not even qualify if you are) and removed some of the risk of behaviors that lead to birth out-of-wedlock (which caused a concurrent issue of children not being raised well enough by both their parents, a phenomenon that self-perpetuated over generations and led to kids being swallowed up by criminal elements).

This also meant that the community ties forged by the reciprocal obligations inherent to a society where men work to feed themselves and the families they may have ceased to exist in great measure, to be replaced by the mostly apathetic but unilateral subsidy of the government.

There's value in work, even if you're still poor: you learn intangible skills (e.g. diligence, discipline, obedience, critical thinking) that may shape you into a proper or even exemplary member of society before they start paying off in whatever social mobility you have access to. Naturally, there would be consequences if you made it so that one could 1) be sustained without much-- if any-- work, and 2) disincentivize upwards social mobility by creating no sufficient transitional zone for those who are trying to get off welfare.

On the other hand, you've been rhetorically jumping around. You originally stated that this problem well predated LBJ, then you brought up Liberia for no reason, and now you're making an argument that's actually closer to mine.
Even the woke essentially admit this with their fixation on forcing white kids into majority black schools.
I recall this being the other way around, only because they want black kids going to schools that have more funding and better teaching quality. Interjecting any number of any kind of kid into a low-performing school isn't going to accomplish anything if the school continues to be low-quality. Being white doesn't confer increased academic performance, especially if the teachers don't give a damn and aren't actually teaching.
 
Last edited:
I recall this being the other way around, only because they want black kids going to schools that have more funding and better teaching quality. Interjecting any number of any kind of kid into a low-performing school isn't going to accomplish anything if the school continues to be low-quality. Being white doesn't confer increased academic performance, especially if the teachers don't give a damn and aren't actually teaching.

White kids whose parents make $20k/year have the same SAT scores as black kids whose parents make $200k/year. It's not the quality of the schools; it's the quality of the students.

The woke have thrown tantrums about white parents noping out of highly funded, experimental schools that turned out to be majority black. They'll never admit to it, but I think the central thesis of most of their race agitating recognizes that black people can't succeed without white people's presence tamping down their worst impulses and cultural attitudes. And that's giving wokies some benefit of the doubt. I think the likes of Kendi fully believe that black people can't succeed on their own merits, and so have to be given shit they didn't earn.
 
White kids whose parents make $20k/year have the same SAT scores as black kids whose parents make $200k/year.
Poor people can go to good schools. Not only that, but a simple score average doesn't even tell 20% of the story.

It's like talking about male versus female intelligence-- most female data points hover around their mean whereas there's more dispersion of male data points. What exactly does an average tell you? Is it that there's a lot of high score cases and low score cases? Is it that they're mostly hovering around said mean?

It's not the quality of the schools; it's the quality of the students.
No, it's both. The potential of the students doesn't mean anything if that potential can't be pulled out because of a lack of resources on the part of the school.

The woke have thrown tantrums about white parents noping out of highly funded, experimental schools that turned out to be majority black.
Are these public or charter? Because "the woke" don't like charter schools, for the most part.
 
Throwing money at schools is bullshit beyond a certain point.

People a few generations ago were beautifully educated in buildings that often didn't have electricity and running water. The building the Constitution was written in didn't have electricity or running water. George Washington shit in a hole in the ground.

Saying that kids need a laptop and an iPad and the latest shiny textbooks and the thermostat set to 68 in the winter and 72 in the summer is an excuse.

Like Joe Biden today saying that the solution to gun violence is more money for kids to go to summer camp.

Not once has a kid ever gone, "Welp, I was going to learn to read today but the thermostat was set at 80 so I just gave up."

Kids who are interested in learning will learn and kids who aren't interested won't, and it has little or nothing to do with the school and virtually everything to do with what's happening at home.
 
When I was a young woman I used to go to Festival At The Lake where everyone came out and had fun but then there were too many jogger-related shootings and they ended it.

At least with Juneteenth there are no Whites, Asians, or Hispanics to get caught in the crossfire.
My area had a great cruise for about 40 years. Think American Graffiti.
So much fun when we were younger, always ran into friends, just a good time for everyone.
Then gangs began showing up, and shooting anyone that looked at them wrong because " muh reespekt".
So after about three years of this, the city enacted an ordinance forbidding cruising. Not much to do now for the kids now. No bowling alleys, pool halls, theaters closed for over a year, no school or extracurricular activities.

But at least these fine people are allowed to twerk on emergency vehicles.
 
White kids whose parents make $20k/year have the same SAT scores as black kids whose parents make $200k/year. It's not the quality of the schools; it's the quality of the students.

The quality of the schools is terrible. Not a single person I've ever met has said American schools are anything less than hell on earth. The university professor I know has stated to me with absolute sincerity that he views genital mutilation as only a fractionally more damaging thing to do to a child than forcing them through the American primary education system.
 
We need the fucking race war to get underway. Like, really. Drop the fucking A-bomb on Chicago and let’s get to it. That nigger cunt won’t face any fucking consequences.

 
Are we sure those aren't troll replies? It's near impossible to tell nowadays.
Every time I assume that something is a troll because it is to insane and impossible to be real I get proven wrong.

We live in a world where Elvis came back from space as a clown.
 
I'm getting really tired of hearing constantly about how we don't respect the sanctity of black lives enough meanwhile black people cause the deaths of other black people in stupid ways all the time.
 
Like Joe Biden today saying that the solution to gun violence is more money for kids to go to summer camp.

Not once has a kid ever gone, "Welp, I was going to learn to read today but the thermostat was set at 80 so I just gave up."

Kids who are interested in learning will learn and kids who aren't interested won't, and it has little or nothing to do with the school and virtually everything to do with what's happening at home.

I used to volunteer for a settlement house on the Lower East Side. They offered after school and summer programs and tutoring. We had a good group of kids who showed up regularly, but a lot of kids never stopped in except to say hello to their friends before going off to do God knows what.

More summer camps are great for kids whose parents have it together enough to take an active role in their kids' lives. Involved parents are the most important barrier to kids getting into dumb shit, and things like summer camps and after school activities help those parents keep their kids out of trouble. But if the parents are out to lunch? Those programs will do jack shit.

Also, there are already a fuckload of programs out there. If black kids aren't using them, that's a choice they and their parents are making. Unless Biden proposes sending those kids to summer camp by force, more money isn't likely to change anything.
 
So the liberal response to this is: "Ummm sweetie akshually it wasn't like, a shooting, it was something else entirely, you're poisoning the well and being disingenuous! Nice strawman!"

So, uhh...generally emergency vehicle operators trigger the lights and sirens on when they have an urgent call to take care of. Does it matter if the ambulance was dispatched to a shooting, or someone having a stroke, or someone who slipped on a banana peel and busted their skull on the ground?

Not really, usually it means "urgent business get out of the fucking way or someone might die" and it's a universally understood custom in most civilized places.

This video perfectly sums up the current state of affairs we're dealing with. The average decent person, when they see lights in their rear-view mirror and hear sirens, might think: "God damn it I'm going to be late."
But they'll still pull the fuck over to let the ambulance through. Because they're civilized. Because they might consider: "What if it were I or one of my relatives that needed an ambulance, and traffic/crowds of twerking negros kept it from arriving in a timely manner?" They pull over because they understand that a couple minutes at most tacked onto their trip doesn't compare to the situation for the poor bastard needing/being transported by the ambulance.

Now, these people on the other hand, see an ambulance with lights and sirens on and they view it as an opportunity to end up on World Star. They don't even have enough in-group preference to consider that maybe another black person needed a fucking ambulance, which is pretty likely given where they're at. Let alone an out-group preference. Making way for emergency vehicles is universally recognized as the right thing to do in any functioning society, but not for these people.

But, thank God we saved the West from Hitler, right? At least we didn't need to learn German.
 
White kids whose parents make $20k/year have the same SAT scores as black kids whose parents make $200k/year. It's not the quality of the schools; it's the quality of the students.
Poor whites don't take the SAT unless they know they will do well enough to get a grant and scholarships for college. Wealthy people all take it because it's a requirement for enrolment and mommy and daddy will pay for their 4 year degree in fingerpainting.
The quality of the schools is terrible. Not a single person I've ever met has said American schools are anything less than hell on earth. The university professor I know has stated to me with absolute sincerity that he views genital mutilation as only a fractionally more damaging thing to do to a child than forcing them through the American primary education system.
My school was great. K-12 rural school. But it was in America. So there.

It has to do with how well districts handle their malcontents and where the rest of the students are placed in proximity of them. If they isolate and handle them it's better for everyone else and experiences are better overall. This runs afoul of the policy of "mainstreaming" so it doesn't happen much.

Another solution that is politically untenable is removing the truancy laws so that only the kids who want to learn go to school. If the little shits don't want to be there, let 'em leave. Fuck 'em.
 
Back
Top Bottom