Combating Anti-Science Propaganda

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic sparked an explosion of health misinformation—the World Health Organization dubbed it an “infodemic.” In parallel with the triumphant development of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines, we have also witnessed a simultaneous proliferation of anti-vaccine propaganda, which serves to undermine life-saving efforts to end the pandemic.


At the forefront of this ideological war, we have Dr. Peter Hotez, an internationally recognized physician-scientist in neglected tropical diseases and vaccine development. Dr. Hotez is dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, as well as the co-director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development (CVD).


Peter Hotez


Source: Peter Hotez
I’ve invited Dr. Hotez to offer some of his extensive insights into the topic of how to best combat anti-science propaganda and to discuss its psychosocial context.

Stea: Thank you for agreeing to this interview. There’s a section on your website called, “Combating Anti-Science.” Why is this topic important to you and how did you become involved?


Hotez: I started going up against anti-vaccine groups a few years after my youngest daughter Rachel—diagnosed with autism and intellectual disabilities—was born, and they alleged vaccines caused autism. Even early on, the preponderance of evidence showed that [autism] had genetic and epigenetic origins in early fetal development. After I wrote a book about it entitled Vaccines Did Not Cause Rachel's Autism, I became a target for anti-vaccine groups. But as a vaccine scientist and parent of an adult daughter with autism, I felt if I didn't do this, who would?


Stea: You recently wrote an article in Nature entitled "COVID vaccines: time to confront anti-vax aggression," whereby you call for a more organized, global response to anti-vaccine groups via the collaborative use of cybersecurity, law enforcement, public education, and international relations. What makes this strategy so important and how can it be transformed from an abstract idea to a reality?


Hotez: I think the public health community has made some mistakes over the last two decades through our silence. We were reluctant to speak about the acceleration of anti-vaccine groups for fear that we might inadvertently give them "oxygen."

The consequence, of course, is that they didn't need our help and grew into well-funded and well-organized groups that acquired a political dimension through political action committees, mostly linked to the political right and almost 60 million followers on social media, according to the Center for Countering Digital Hate. Complicating this is a state actor: namely, the Russian government. As I've said in my recent Nature, Scientific American, and PLOS Biology essays, this is a full-on anti-science empire.


Stea: The Russian involvement via computer bots and trolls to create international discord about vaccines certainly adds a fascinating, worrisome, and disturbing layer of complexity.

To say that you’ve received a fair share of targeted harassment for your advocacy efforts would be an incredible understatement. What has been the nature of the harassment that you have faced?


Hotez: I don't like to go into too much detail for security reasons. But I will say that as of late, I’ve received lots of aggression from the far-right and even White Nationalist groups, including lots of Nazi and Nuremberg imagery. These are scary times.

Stea: As you might know, I am a coalition member of the Canadian anti-misinformation social media campaign, #ScienceUpFirst, which was founded by Professor Timothy Caulfield and Senator Stanley Kutcher. The mandate of the initiative is to empower Canadians to work together against COVID-19 misinformation. In what ways can various health professionals and the general public come together to help counter anti-science messaging?


Hotez: I think it’s important to get educated with respect to the breadth and scope of these anti-vaccine and anti-science groups and to recognize that they now dominate the media and political landscape in some instances. It’s also important to recognize that many individuals who espouse anti-vaccine and anti-science views are themselves victims who have been targeted with misinformation.


Stea: Do you have any final words of wisdom for us?

Hotez: Things have gotten much worse in this time of COVID-19, particularly the political dimension both with respect to the political right and now Russia. We need to look beyond the health sector for help in how to counter this problem.
 
Things have gotten much worse in this time of COVID-19, particularly the political dimension both with respect to the political right and now Russia. We need to look beyond the health sector for help in how to counter this problem.
Just remember that the left unironically believes there are 300+ genders, men can give birth, learning math is racist, GMO foods promote colonialism, and that food magically appears on shelves at Whole Foods.
 
I went to psychologytoday.com to check their pro-science agenda and of course, they support trans-children, think school kid wanting to invert his penis is just fine and trying to stop that from happening is harassment and bullying and that's no good for the mental well-being.
Very sciencetastic.
 
The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic sparked an explosion of health misinformation—the World Health Organization dubbed it an “infodemic.”
>World Health Organization
Stopped reading there. Anyone paying attention around January last year knows that they were covering that shit up so every country was caught off guard because "the WHO said it's not going to be a pandemic."
 
Maybe there'd be less "anti-science propaganda" if you stopped pretending that unsettled science was settled science when you find it politically convenient.
 
In closing, do you have any words of wisdom for us?
"Russia Russia.. bots bots.. Nazi Nazi... "
Who on earth would read this and take it seriously?

Holy shit I just read the referenced "essays" in 'Nature' and 'Scientific American'. This guy is just a hack parroting 6 month old CNN talking points.
 
Last edited:
Maybe there'd be less "anti-science propaganda" if you stopped pretending that unsettled science was settled science when you find it politically convenient.
Science is never settled. Today's findings could be made obsolete tomorrow. After all, science is a tool used to understand the world.
 
Just remember that the left unironically believes there are 300+ genders, men can give birth, learning math is racist, GMO foods promote colonialism, and that food magically appears on shelves at Whole Foods.
Agri-science, food science, forestry, fisheries, mining engineering, petroleum engineering, and chemistry in general are a gigantic shitshow. Not to mention all the weird shit they think nuclear power and ionizing radiation does. It's 5G-causes-covid levels of retarded and totally mainstream.

New Age ideas did a real number on the left's ability to science a long long time ago. Fuck, there are huge chunks of our healthcare system that are eastern woo snakeoil that were peddled by them. Evidence-based medicine is scientific. Chiropracty, naturopathy, acupuncture, and TCM are not.
 
This article is actually a fine example of just how critical the press and journalists are today.

Interview a dean of a prestigious medical college.

Have him talk about being bullied on the internet.
It's worse than that, the "interviewer" is an advocate for the exact same issues. If they're going to put a circlejerk in print, at least don't be quite so blatant about it.

Stea: As you might know, I am a coalition member of the Canadian anti-misinformation social media campaign, #ScienceUpFirst, which was founded by Professor Timothy Caulfield and Senator Stanley Kutcher. The mandate of the initiative is to empower Canadians to work together against COVID-19 misinformation. In what ways can various health professionals and the general public come together to help counter anti-science messaging?
 
In closing, do you have any words of wisdom for us?
"Russia Russia.. bots bots.. Nazi Nazi... "
Who on earth would read this and take it seriously?

Holy shit I just read the referenced "essays" in 'Nature' and 'Scientific American'. This guy is just a hack parroting 6 month old CNN talking points.
Its always fucking Russia. You know why? Because Russia will do whatever the fuck it can get away with to sow division inside the USA. All it took was five figures or so in Facebook ads and the Dems were reeing non-stop for four years about Russian election tampering. You know where all those state secessionist groups hold their meetups? Moscow. Its why the Dems very, very quietly pretended the CalExit talk never happened once word got around. Putin loves the Democratic Party because all he needs to do is sit in a chair and they'll start writing op-eds on how Putin just sitting there ominously means he's plotting to steal the election.
 
Back
Top Bottom