Would caligula be considered a lolcow in today's standard? - and other historical lolcows..

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

pedoguyguykrai

41 percent tranny janny clean up crew
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Feb 1, 2021
So I'm bored and watching some historical documentaries, on my day off, and It occured to me as I watching a documentary on caligula, he could probably not only be insane, but a lolcow of his day.
As to why:

1. He had an incestous relationship with his sister to the point he lmao when she died he made her an official roman godess.
2. he married a pregnant woman and named the baby from that after his sister
3. he had a long standing war with posiden god of the sea.
4. he was a degenerate.

but idk, if it where the times, idk could he be a lolcow if such an indivdual existed in modern times?
also what other historical figures would be considered lolcows or fit the lolcow definition?
 
Assuming all the shit that was written about him is true, yes. Assuming some of it was true and some of it was lies, yes. Assuming most of it was lies, no, the people who hated him so much they made up the stupidest bullshit to get at him would be.
 
The movie is great.

It has this thing.
DetjQ4_XkAEn-r-.jpg
 
I feel like populist Emperors like Caligula and Calcala get the Trump treatment from historians.
the historiographical material on caligula is notoriously quite biased.
it is likely that he had mental problems but not at the levels described.
The horse thing for example was just a stunt to fuck with the senate.
 
Back
Top Bottom