NATO Designates China as a 'Systemic' Security Challenge

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

NATO Designates China as a 'Systemic' Security Challenge​




NATO leaders designated China as presenting "systemic challenges" in a summit communique on Monday that marked a forceful stance for the Western military alliance, declared a priority for President Joe Biden.
In a diplomatic victory for Biden, who has urged his fellow NATO leaders to stand up to China's authoritarianism and growing military might, the final statement branded China a security risk to the Western alliance.

The language, which will now set the path for alliance policy, comes a day after the Group of Seven rich nations issued a statement on human rights in China and Taiwan that Beijing said slandered its reputation.

"China's stated ambitions and assertive behavior present systemic challenges to the rules-based international order and to areas relevant to alliance security," NATO leaders said in a communique after their summit.

Biden also told European allies the alliance's mutual defense pact was a "sacred obligation" for the United States -- a marked shift in tone from his predecessor Donald Trump, who had threatened to withdraw from the alliance and accused Europeans of contributing too little.

"I want all Europe to know that the United States is there," said Biden. "NATO is critically important to us."

Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel, at her last summit of the alliance before she steps down in September, described Biden's arrival as the opening of a new chapter.

Biden said both Russia and China were not acting "in a way that is consistent with what we had hoped," referring to Western efforts since the mid-1990s to bring both countries into the fold of liberal democracies.

In a sign of a common position emerging on China, no longer seen as a benign trading partner, the European Union has already designated Beijing a "systemic rival."

Allied leaders are also concerned about Russia's military build-up near Ukraine, as well as its covert and cyber attacks to undermine Western states.

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said China's growing military presence from the Baltics to Africa meant nuclear-armed NATO had to be prepared.

"China is coming closer to us. We see them in cyberspace, we see China in Africa, but we also see China investing heavily in our own critical infrastructure," he said, a reference to ports and telecoms networks. "We need to respond together as an alliance."

G7 nations meeting in Britain over the weekend scolded China over human rights in its Xinjiang region, called for Hong Kong to keep a high degree of autonomy and demanded a full investigation of the origins of the coronavirus in China.

China's embassy in London said it was resolutely opposed to mentions of Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan, which it said distorted the facts and exposed the "sinister intentions of a few countries such as the United States."

"China's reputation must not be slandered," the embassy said on Monday.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, arriving at the summit, said there were both risks and rewards with Beijing.

"I don't think anybody around the table wants to descend into a new Cold War with China," he said.

DEEP ECONOMIC TIES

From China's investments in European ports and plans to set up military bases in Africa to joint military exercises with Russia, NATO is now agreed that Beijing's rise deserves a strong response, although envoys said that would be multi-faceted.

Allies are mindful of their economic links with China. Total German trade with China in 2020 was more than 212 billion euros ($256.82 billion), according to German government data. Total Chinese holdings of U.S. Treasuries as of March 2021 stood at $1.1 trillion, according to U.S. data, and total U.S. trade with China in 2020 was $559 billion.

Biden will meet Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday in Geneva.

Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda said that Russia was trying to "swallow" Belarus and that NATO needed to be united in deterring Moscow. Nauseda also said the Baltic nations would push for more U.S. forces in their region to deter Russia.
 
Huawei scandal, chinese spy networks and disinformation campaigns, Covid Lab leak and aggressive trade practices. Pretty sure everyone is getting sick of the CCP.
 
This asian country on the pacific is a direct threat to the north atlantic treaty organization.
 
"China is a systemic threat that must be dealt with! Oh, also, now that Trump is out of office we're not paying any NATO upkeep fees lol." - All European members of NATO, probably.
 
No wars between superpowers are ever going to happen. They have too much to lose.
Superpower is a modern, made up, meaningless word. You really think incredibly powerful nations have not fought each other throughout history, again and again and again?
 
Superpower is a modern, made up, meaningless word. You really think incredibly powerful nations have not fought each other throughout history, again and again and again?
there's only one superpower in the first place, but its not relevant at this point as all you need to have to be taken seriously as nation is access to long range nukes.
 
Superpower is a modern, made up, meaningless word. You really think incredibly powerful nations have not fought each other throughout history, again and again and again?
No such war has happened after 1945. Nuclear deterrence has made conventional war between great powers/superpowers obsolete. The development of modern weapons also seeks towards increasing conventional deterrence (or their utilisation in proxy wars). If nuclear war did not happen when the USSR was led by some paranoid geriatrics which equated the US with the Third Reich, it is never going to happen.
 
Gee, maybe if they had agreed with Trump in the beginning, he would have pushed harder for other countries to contribute. Now they got Beijing Biden in charge.
 
I'm still not impressed. "Systemic challenge" is just a neolib euphemism designed to treat Pooh Bear with kid-gloves.

If the question had been about Trump supporters, it'd be a litany of breathless, histrionic exaggerations about a MORTAL THREAT TO DEMOCRACY™️!

We know Beijing has them by the balls.
 
Back
Top Bottom