Science Majority who oppose trans rights and Black Lives Matter movement have warped sense of reality, according to science

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account


The majority of people who oppose trans rights and the Black Lives Mattermovement have an incorrect “perception of reality”, a study has shown.

The research, conducted by the Policy Institute at King’s College London and Ipsos MORI and titled “The ‘fault lines’ in the UK’s culture wars“, studied the viewpoints of participants “on each side of six high-profile issues”.

The six issues, which were presented by researchers as “prominent current debates”, included transgender rights and the Black Lives Matter movement, alongside Brexit, party politics, the British empire and COVID-19.


The study looked at three elements of “culture war issues”: “How strongly people identify with a ‘side’ in a culture war debate, the social distance between one side and the other side, and whether group identity affects perceptions of measurable realities.”

While more “liberal” or left-leaning participants were more likely to say they would struggle to be friends with those “who take the opposing point of view”, the “traditional” or right-leaning respondents were shown to have a warped sense of reality.

In fact, the majority of those who opposed the Black Lives Matter movement and those who think trans rights have “gone too far” disagreed with factual realities.


Of all respondents, 31 per cent said they believed “trans rights have not gone far enough” in the UK. A further 31 per cent said “trans rights have gone as far as they should”, and 17 per cent said they had “gone too far”.

But those who opposed trans rights did not have a basic grasp of facts.

Among those who thought trans rights had “gone too far”, just 67 per cent were unable to correctly identify that trans people were twice as likely to be the victim of crime compared to the UK population as a whole, while 79 per cent those who supported expanding trans rights were able to understand that this was the case.



Similarly, almost two thirds of those who opposed the Black Lives Matter movement did not believe the proven fact that “Black African, Caribbean or Black British employees earned around nine per cent less than White British employees”, and 39 per cent said they thought Black and white employees earned the same amount.

While participants on the “traditional” right-leaning side of the political spectrum mostly opposed the Black Lives Matter movement and disagreed with expanding rights for trans people, they did strongly believe that we should be “proud” of the British Empire, which was responsible for many anti-LGBT+ laws around the world that are still in effect today.

Of Conservative party voters, 67 per cent said the British Empire was “something to be proud of”, compared to just 19 per cent of Labour voters.
 
right-leaning respondents were shown to have a warped sense of reality.
Oh? Like believing that men can be women? That blacks are oppressed despite every corporation and government in the western world kissing their asses nonstop? Like believing that women are oppressed when more of them have college degrees than men? Like believing that people need to pay for slavery that happened over a century ago while posting about politics on a device made with slave labor today? Like believing that we need a fifteen dollar minimum wage because of wage stagnation whilst championing illegal immigration? Like believing that gays/trans are oppressed not only while every government and corporation in the west kisses their asses, but also championing the cause of muslims? Like voting for a neoliberal corporatist to oust a populist centrist because he makes "mean tweets"? Like believing that you can vaccinate against a virus that is part of the family(ies) of virii that make up the common cold?

Remind me again who's got the warped sense of reality, here? And this was just the shit I could think of off the top of my head for fuck's sake!
 
Because in a normal world
Men can be women.
Clown world is one helluva drug.
 
Basically the "right" to be seen and treated exactly like the opposite sex in every aspect of life. The "right" to force everyone to entertain and cater to their delusions. Since there's some pushback over allowing biological males in women's sports and in public restrooms, they see that as a sign of "fascism", "white supremacy" and "transphobia".

I'm sure it all entails the "right" to have all their "life-saving" surgeries paid for by the state or any insurance plan.

So, not rights but special privileges.

I'm legit waiting for the first female inmate in California to petition the state for a boob job.

I'm not sure on what grounds the state could say no.
 
Science nowadays can be manipulated to support The Narrative. Then the woke can point to the "research" and claim to be "on The Right Side of History" - and call skeptics "science deniers" (and "Nazis", etc).

As long as we've had science, it has been manipulated to support the Narrative. It just happens that in the past, the Narrative was controlled by different political forces than today. But the very idea of truly objective science is patently false, as any scientist could tell you.
 
Back
Top Bottom